Council approves Tierra Verde annexation
Tampabay.com

Comment Policy

    Please be sure your comments are appropriate before submitting them. Inappropriate comments include content that:
  • Is libelous
  • Is abusive, harassing, or threatening
  • Is obscene, vulgar, or profane
  • Is racially, ethnically or religiously offensive
  • Is illegal or encourages criminal acts
  • Is known to be inaccurate or contains a false attribution
  • Infringes copyrights, trademarks, publicity or any other rights of others
  • Impersonates anyone (actual or fictitious)
  • Solicits funds, goods or services, or advertises
  • The St. Petersburg Times does not edit posts but reserves the right to delete comments that violate our policy.

    Report abuse: abuse@tampabay.com

« Baker fights for BayWalk | Main | Nurse's annexation vote draws green flak »

November 21, 2008

Council approves Tierra Verde annexation

ST. PETERSBURG - In the end, the letters to City Hall, the petitions and the stern comments from critics in all levels of local government weren't enough to persuade the City Council to vote against annexing Tierra Verde's waterfront commercial district.

The council voted 5-2 to annex 28-acres of unincorporated Tierra Verde Friday in a financially motivated effort that expands the city's borders across the Pinellas Bayway into the small wealthy enclave.

Council members Herb Polson and Jeff Danner cast the dissenting votes. Council member Jim Kennedy was not present.

The Tierra Verde Marina, a vacant 56-unit condominium resort, five vacant residential lots and a 7-Eleven are among the former Tierra Verde properties that will now reside in St. Petersburg. Property owners there supported the annexation because the city has a more lenient approach to development than Pinellas County. The city also annexed 10 acres of submerged state land, the only way it can connect to the 18 acres of commercial property on the island.

The annexation would add nearly $200,000 to the city's coffers in 2009. New development could eventually contribute $1-million in annual property tax revenue. In return, the city is now responsible for providing services such as police and code enforcement to the northernmost tip of Tierra Verde.

City officials offered a last minute bargaining chip late Thursday to sweeten the deal: don't challenge the annexation, and development will be limited to eight stories instead of the maximum allowable height of 15 stories. If the annexation is challenged, the deal is off and 150 foot tall buildings could be built.

Mayor Rick Baker said the deal was cut after he met with Tierra Verde community leaders to address concerns about over-development. Tierra Verde limits building height at five stories.

"We have been trying to act in good faith," said Baker. "The city has tried to listen."

But county and Tierra Verde residents not involved with the land grab say they plan to challenge the legality of the annexation in court anyway.

"They left us no choice," said Brian Smith, the county's planning director. "I'm kind of disappointed."

The annexation has been widely criticized. State and county leaders and neighborhood groups implored the city to delay the vote. Critics said the annexation is inappropriate at a time when the county is in the midst of overhauling its annexation restrictions and hundreds of Tierra Verde residents who are not part of the annexation oppose it.

Council members said they received phone calls up until Friday morning asking them to delay the vote. Council member Leslie Curran said she spoke with a critic who described the annexation as a communist takeover

Many Tierra Verde residents fear the annexation will divide their community and remove valuable commercial property from what could one day be an independent municipality. They also worry new development will strain the bedroom community's already overstressed main corridor, the only road to the county's Fort De Soto park. 

This was the city's third attempt to acquire the 28 acres. Two earlier efforts were dropped after questions arose over voting rights of boat dwellers in the annexation. The city ultimately decided not to annex the dock where those people live.

At one point Friday, several council members seemed uncomfortable with the decision before them.

"I'm struggling with this," said Danner. "Is it the right way to go? Should we have engaged the neighborhoods more?"

Council member Karl Nurse also expressed some reservations.

"I must confess I've been kind of wrestling with this. I think all the pros are self evident, and, frankly, for the citizens of St. Petersburg a million dollars a year over time is not insignificant," he said.

But, Nurse added, the city's actions could also strain its relationships with the county and the people of Tierra Verde.

Cristina Silva, Times staff writer

*

Comments

HOMETOWN DEMOCRACY! Support it or throw in with the developers. Those are your choices now.

Me

FIGHT THEM TOOTH AND NAIL ON THIS TIERRA VERDE RESIDENTS! DON'T LET BAKER AND HIS CRONIES DO THIS TO YOU> THIS WHOLE MAYOR OF THE YEAR THING HAS GONE TO HIS OVER ZEALOUS COTTON PICKEN HEAD AND THEY NEED TO BE STOPPED IN THEIR TRACKS. HOW DARE THEY TRY TO TAKE YOUR OASIS AND COMMERCIALIZE FOR THE SAKE OF THE ALMIGHTY DOLLAR...HAS EVERYBODY GONE STARK RAVING MAD...THIS IS CRAZY CRAZY CRAZY. DON'T TAKE THIS LYING DOWN I SAY

Paul

Residents of Tierra Verde, St.Petersburg,And all of Pinellas county should take note of what can happen when our elected officials work behind closed doors to benefit their friends and benefactors.
The Tierra Verde LAND GRAB is just one example
where money talks and BS walks,
Although our Governor may not have jurisdiction, he should have told his buddy the Mayor of St. Pete. that they should have listened to the County government and the Tierra Verde residents
before making this decision.
Maybe we should check and see if these developers were financial supporters of our Mayor,Governor or council.
Something is not right and should be questioned further.

One thing's for sure... it ain't over yet. This Annexation is the kind of thing that makes elections interesting and there are NEW elections in March!

March? Really.

tic.tic.tic.tic...

No St. Pete offices will be voted on in March.

call your legislator and support TV.

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.

About This Blog

From the writers of the St. Petersburg Times, Bay Buzz offers the latest news on Tampa Bay politics. This is a public forum sponsored and maintained by the St. Petersburg Times. When you post comments here, what you say becomes public and could appear in the newspaper. You are not engaging in private communication with candidates or Times staffers.

Got a story idea? E-mail Times editor Heather Urquides: hurquides@sptimes.com

Subscribe to this Blog

Advertisement