Judges and clerks face off about court fees
LARGO -- It was a pair of a pair of dueling press conferences. Chief Pinellas-Pasco Circuit Judge Robert Morris invited the media to the Criminal Courts Complex for a discussion of legislative issues today, and defended a proposal that would transfer many duties of the county clerks offices to the court system. Having gotten wind of the event, the clerks from Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando counties made themselves available in the Criminal Courts Complex immediately afterward for a counter-argument.
Morris said it only makes sense for the state to take a good hard look at the current system, in which clerks manage court records, and collect numerous fees for everything from traffic tickets to filing lawsuits. He said his understanding is that the clerks take in $550-million statewide, even after they have disbursed fees they are required to send to various other government agencies. Meanwhile, it only costs $430 million to run the entire state court system.
"In these times when money is short, every dime should be looked at," Morris said.
Clerks Ken Burke, Paula O'Neil and Karen Nicolai, of Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando counties, said essentially that every dime is being looked at. They said they have plenty of outside audits to make sure they are spending their money properly. And they said elected clerks are responsive to citizens, and driven to look for efficiencies wherever they can. Transferring the duties to judges would not improve that, and may even be contrary to the Florida Constitution, they said.
"It's not well thought-out," Burke said of the proposal now wending its way through the legislative system.
-- Curtis Krueger


The position is Clerk of Court NOT Court of Clerk. An independent judiciary needs its filing fee funds to stay in the court system to fund public access to the Courts.
Posted by: Judicial independence | March 19, 2009 at 06:37 PM
"In these times when money is short, every dime should be looked at," Morris said.
Yo… Einstein! If you did your job and looked at every dime even when money was long, maybe we wouldn’t be in this mess at all!
As expected… instead of looking at existing and obvious waste, redundancy, and ineffective programs… we seek to keep all that, and look to increase our own power and teach the electorate a lesson for expecting some fiscal responsibility.
The Clerks are right on this. We need their independent eyes of this process; THAT’S WHY WE HAVE AND ELECT THEM!
Posted by: Ito | March 20, 2009 at 10:56 AM
Is this really because the judges want to move away from state legislature having so much authority over their budgets?
Posted by: Jack | March 29, 2009 at 03:11 PM
All the clerks are just as corrupt and evil as the judges and lawyers are. They are all skimming money off the top, who do they think they're fooling. They are all hated and despised by the poor and working people. I hoppe something bad happens to them or even better, that they end up in prison where they belong.
Posted by: Carlo | May 17, 2009 at 06:27 PM
Local government in the 21st century is not the same as it was even 50 years ago.
Clerks of the Court are redundant and unnecessary. Just another office to siphon money from tax payers.
Posted by: Local government in today't terms | May 17, 2009 at 07:29 PM