Woman: I was a sex slave
PORT RICHEY -- A man was arrested Tuesday afternoon and accused of running a house of prostitution and holding a woman as a sex slave.
"It wasn't a dungeon per se," said Kevin Doll, a spokesman for the Pasco County Sheriff's Office, "but it did have all the accessories.
"Whips, chains...sexual toys," he said.
Deputies converged on the house, at 7601 Jasmine Blvd, on Tuesday afternoon. They arrested Andrew Michael Kobak, 34, and charged him with maintaining a place for prostitution and deriving the proceeds of prostitution.
The woman, Alyssandra Cardillo, 19, was given notice to appear on a charge of prostitution. She told deputies that Kobak set up a schedule for her, charging $60 per sex act. When Cardillo was paid, she gave the money to Kobak, the report said, adding that Cardillo had a contract to be a sex slave.
She said she had sexual activity with eight other men in a four-day period.
According to Doll, Kobak advertised her services on the Internet.
-- Thomas Lake, Times Staff Writer
Warning: contains graphic material
Read Master Drew's slavery contract
Photo of residence by Mike Pease | Times; inset photo from Pasco County Sheriff's Department.


Held as a slave? What did he do hide her flip-flops!!
Posted by: lew | Wednesday, July 11, 2007 at 12:42 PM
The lawyer who prepared the sex contract should be disrobed.
Posted by: | Wednesday, July 11, 2007 at 01:38 PM
The lawyer was the first client.
Posted by: aflyonwall | Wednesday, July 11, 2007 at 02:43 PM
$60 per sex act? Somebody was being ripped off!
Posted by: Yokel | Wednesday, July 11, 2007 at 03:08 PM
i have the $60 where can i get in on the act?
Posted by: steve | Wednesday, July 11, 2007 at 03:22 PM
SOUNDS LIKE SHE'S TRYING TO WORM HER WAY OUT OF SOMETHING. SHE NEVER SAID ANYTHING ABOUT BEING CHAINED UP OR HOW SHE TRIED TO ESCAPE, SO HOW WAS SHE HELD AS A SEX SLAVE? WHY DIDN'T SHE TELL ONE OF HER JOHN'S THAT THIS MAN WAS HOLDING HER AGAINST HER WILL? I'M SURE ONE OF THEM WOULD HAVE TOLD THE POLICE WITHOUT THIS MAN KNOWING THEY SAID SOMETHING. CHARGE HER FOR PROSTITUTION TOO!! NOT GET AWAY WITH IT.
Posted by: TINA | Wednesday, July 11, 2007 at 03:24 PM
Um, hello? She was being charged with prostitution, didn't you read?
The rest of the comments are even worse. Ignorant and disgusting. I guess you've never heard of abuse and Stockholm syndrome.
You should be ashamed.
Posted by: D.R. | Wednesday, July 11, 2007 at 03:50 PM
Common now, were all slaves to any contract we sign.
Posted by: TanteEmma | Wednesday, July 11, 2007 at 04:31 PM
Yeah, if any of you really believe that this contract was drawn up and prepared by a competent lawyer, you're a moron.
And the correct term is disbarred, not disrobed.
Posted by: | Wednesday, July 11, 2007 at 05:13 PM
I paid 60 dollars and it was not worth it
Posted by: WTF | Wednesday, July 11, 2007 at 05:29 PM
5:13 pm...I've seen contracts done by attorneys that are worse than this one. In fact, not to many attorneys draw up prenuptial agreements anywhere near as good as this agreement.
Posted by: | Wednesday, July 11, 2007 at 05:36 PM
Do a little more research. This isn't an actual slavery contract but a BDSM/roleplaying contract. There are plenty of them out there http://tinyurl.com/2mbzjz .
It is fun to laugh at, especially the font that they chose to use but it is about as binding as the lock on Paris Hilton's chastity belt.
The prostitution charges on the other hand are serious, and surprisingly cheap.
Posted by: David | Wednesday, July 11, 2007 at 05:47 PM
Pumpernickel! PUMPERNICKEL ALREADY!!!
Posted by: Ouch | Wednesday, July 11, 2007 at 05:47 PM