Pinellas Endorsements
From the Clearwater Chamber straw poll: U.S. Collins - 57; Frazier - 4; Harris- 69; McBride - 22; Monroe-18; Moore- Representative Dist. 9
Bilirakis 204; Busansky 96; Langheier 16; Pasayan 3
Representative Dist. 10:
Fiorella- 8; Simpson - 21; Young 223
Representative Dist. 11:
Adams
Governor:
Crist 147; Davis
Attorney General: Campbell CFO:
Bauguess 8; Johnson 71; Lee 82; Sink 130
Senate Dist. 16:
Berfield 139; Farkas 53; Justice 120.
House 48:
Borland 23; Flaherty 58; Nehr 51; Peluso 43; Zimmerman 108
House 50:
Hooper 121; Jovan 88; Riley 88
House 51:
Cotton 88; Long 137; Reeder 63
House 52:
Cappelli 129; Heller 76; Johnson 24; McCallum 71
House 54:
Frishe 109; Jones 68; Petrucelli 39; Valentine 80; Vechio 6.
And further news about the Judicial race concerning Susan Bedinghaus (wife of Paul Bedinghaus, Pinellas SCM): Bedinghaus 121; Kidder 161


Another endorsement for Tom Lee..thats is wonderful!!!
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 10:16 AM
if it wasnt for all the stupid fireman there nancy would have won.
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 10:22 AM
And if Johnson was not in the primary Lee would have had 153 to Sinks 130 just doing the math and it adds up in Tom Lees favor ...should we be suprised.
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 10:25 AM
If it wasn’t stacked with Republicans, it might actually mean something.
Straw polls predicated on how many tickets/votes your campaign account can buy is meaningless. Politics in the Park is traditionally a Republican hob-nob. Stats break down like this…
75% Republicans, R-candidates and staffers
25% Democrats, D-candidates and staffer
5% General Public
Now, rework the numbers with this reality, and rethink it’s validity.
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 10:31 AM
No need to rework the numbers they speak for themsleves.
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 10:33 AM
… to a very limited mind and Kool-Aid drinking group of “R” lemmings.
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 10:39 AM
Ummm, hello st pete times..why did you single out mrs bedinghaus? What about the others. If you guys don't cut this out, you will build a sympathy vote for her!
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 10:53 AM
10:39
I don't think so.............
hard for you to handle.
I think think the Kool-Aid stand is set up on your side!!!
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 10:59 AM
10:31
Yeah, it is just a popularity contest, whoever buys the most tickets wins. I don't put much stock in the "straw polls" More effective on a voter is the chance to meet the candidates, which the venue provides the opportunity.
Posted by: anotherdmbblonde | August 23, 2006 at 11:09 AM
11:09
Do you not think that those who meet the candidate at this so called "popularuty contest" don't go back and talk about it to others.
And that promotes the candidate also.
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 11:17 AM
Bedinghaus is a mess of an unqualified judicial candidate. The Times piece on her was factual and fair. She just needs to go away.
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 11:22 AM
I'll assume it is not a good thing if they're getting the spelling of your name wrong this late in the Dist. 54 race.
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 11:25 AM
www.charliejustice.com
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 11:27 AM
Has TG gotten within 50% of CC4G in any straw poll. I know they are pretty worthless but come on, seems like the grassroots would have some kinda impact on atleast one poll. I guess it will be the same in 2 weeks.
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 11:29 AM
11:17
umm yeah, I think that is the job of all those campaign staffers anyways. Seriously, how many general public was there without being invited & given a free ticket from some campaign group to vote for their candidate.
I just don't think we should take these straw polls to seriously!
Posted by: anotherdmbblonde | August 23, 2006 at 11:33 AM
11:33,
Be care, we just might have to start calling you “anothersmartblonde”, and you’re getting it. About 12 to 15 general public were in attendance. The rest, as you put so correctly, were staffers paid to attend and vote. Absolutely meaningless poll.
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 11:53 AM
Why on earth is this post titled "endorsements"?! A straw poll at a Chamber event in which only participants who paid $15 to get in can vote is about the furthest thing from either an endorsement OR a representative sample you could ask for. These things are meaningless. Chambers are awfully clever...it's a great fundraiser. "Let's make the campaigns spend a bunch of money buying tickets to our event so that they have people here to vote for them."
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 11:54 AM
You must be a democrat if you think $15 is expensive.
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 12:19 PM
12:19,
Perfectly stated… just as an elite, pompous ass republican would. You’re right though, $15 is nothing to you guys… hell, you drop three times that on Dale Mabry every night.
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 12:27 PM
11:33
Meaningless polls, I bet it would not be meaningless if your guy had won, but hey that does not seem to happen much.
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 12:36 PM
What if my guy is a girl... idiot.
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 12:53 PM
Isn't Pinellas Lee territory? Shouldn't he be winning by as much, if not more than Johnson has in Central Florida?
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 12:56 PM
Isn't Pinellas Lee territory? Shouldn't he be winning by as much, if not more than Johnson has in Central Florida?
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 12:57 PM
Isn't Pinellas Lee territory? Shouldn't he be winning by as much, if not more than Johnson has in Central Florida?
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 12:58 PM
12:53
SENSITIVE ....OK SO ITS A FEMALE.....IDIOT!
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 01:24 PM
10:31 -- You said to rework the numbers and they ended up being 105%...
So...you definitely are a prime example of why we need the FCAT
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 01:46 PM
God, Rod can't even win the BS polls.
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 01:49 PM
1:46
thats great! I guess he/she can't add.
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 01:49 PM
11:22
How do you know it's factual?
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 01:51 PM
Tom Lee math...75 plus 25 plus 5 equals 100? No wonder the line of people he screwed is so long Senate Staffers unite!
Posted by: Tom Lee hates staffers | August 23, 2006 at 02:11 PM
Tom Lee math...75 plus 25 plus 5 equals 100? No wonder the line of people he screwed is so long Senate Staffers unite!
Posted by: Tom Lee hates staffers | August 23, 2006 at 02:13 PM
2:11
you have got it wrong check the 10:31 post.... or this is a Randy Johnson or a Sink staffer either way you all are barking up the wrong tree....
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 02:25 PM
10:22, I'll be sure to let the local FD know you think they are stupid. Later when your house burns down and they don't show up, don't be surprised.
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 03:31 PM
1:46,
Congrats!… you win the distinct honor of being the first one to figure it out… although not completely. I’m saddened that it took you over three hours to do it.
And that, my dear intellect, is why FCAT is a miserable failure. You can color in the little circle ok, but trouble actually working the numbers in a timely fashion.
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 04:17 PM
Get a life. It doesn't take three hours to figure out your simple difficulty with math...some people have jobs and a life where they don't live vicariously on the blog. Oops, I probably should use monosyllabic words because you probably failed the language part too.
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 07:46 PM
--you bad with math
--get a life
--dems will lose
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 07:48 PM
How is this a poll stacked by the GOP when Dems won several of the races?
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 08:59 PM
Can we see the results of the rest of the judicial and school board races? I know it doesn't "mean" anything, but it "suggests" a lot.
Posted by: | August 23, 2006 at 10:21 PM
10:21 -- doesn't "suggest" a thing, except who wasted the most campaign money buying tickets.
Posted by: | August 24, 2006 at 01:29 AM
School Board #2
NANCY BOSTOCK 183
Mary Russell 70
School Board #3
PEGGY O'SHEA 137
Lew Williams 86
and three other candidates under 20
School Board #6
LINDA LERNER 137
Carl Neuman 78
Jack Killingsworth 63
School Board #7
MARY BROWN 126
Jennifer Crockett 58
and three others under 50
Posted by: | August 24, 2006 at 03:18 AM
What about judcial races? I heard Day swept it (thank God, but who's suprised?) and I heard that Kidder barely beat Bedinghaus. Any other results announced?
Posted by: | August 24, 2006 at 11:55 AM
Nto that anyone seemed to notice but in a Republican-heavy poll (from the accusations on here) Carl Zimmermann won in district 48? You can say the Republican vote was divided up among 4 candidates, but the Republican vote was divided up in other races and at least one of the candidates came out the clear winner.
Posted by: John F. | August 26, 2006 at 04:51 PM