Iowa still trumps Florida
Tampabay.com

Comment Policy

    Please be sure your comments are appropriate before submitting them. Inappropriate comments include content that:
  • Is libelous
  • Is abusive, harassing, or threatening
  • Is obscene, vulgar, or profane
  • Is racially, ethnically or religiously offensive
  • Is illegal or encourages criminal acts
  • Is known to be inaccurate or contains a false attribution
  • Infringes copyrights, trademarks, publicity or any other rights of others
  • Impersonates anyone (actual or fictitious)
  • Solicits funds, goods or services, or advertises
  • The St. Petersburg Times does not edit posts but reserves the right to delete comments that violate our policy.

Karen Thurman's call to arms | Main | GOP consultant in murder-suicide »

August 24, 2007

Iowa still trumps Florida

Buttercow TAMA, Iowa -- Sorry, all you political junkies in Florida, New York, California, Michigan and any other state maneuvering to have more say in picking the presidential nominees. Your opinion on the presidential contenders simply matters less than the view of Judy Huff, a retired pharmacy worker from Grinnell, Iowa. Your state leaders may not admit that, but most of the candidates and their political pros know it, and so does the earnest Huff, who makes a point of meeting as many presidential candidates as possible.

"Yes, we get sick of all the phone calls from the campaigns, but we take this responsibility very seriously," said Huff, waiting recently to see Republican Mitt Romney in a rural coffee shop. "It's very fun to be able to see so many candidates in person and learn all we can learn first-hand, instead of relying on newspapers and TV to educate us."

For all the mad scrambling by states, including Florida, to snatch early presidential attention from Iowa and New Hampshire, there's no sign yet that Hawkeye or Granite staters are losing influence. Far from it.  More here.

Comments

"Field of Dreams" for candidates.

Just look at the history of who won Iowa. Doesn't make much difference.

The big "MO" will come with the winner of Florida.

Iowa really amounts to little.

8:42

You are wrong, plain and simple.
GO MITT GO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It's not just about Iowa for Mitt. If he wins Iowa and follows it up with wins in New Hampshire and Michigan this race is going to be done and the Rudy people know it. Look for them to make a strong push in one of those first three states.

It's not just about Iowa for Mitt. If he wins Iowa and follows it up with wins in New Hampshire and Michigan this race is going to be done and the Rudy people know it. Look for them to make a strong push in one of those first three states.

Yeah, but Thompson getting in this race really hurts Romney. No longer will he be the most conservative top tier candidate. I guess you could say he never was, he just was playing one for the cameras. Anyway, I digress, Thompson hurts Romney in all those early states, especially Iowa and South Carolina. Huckabee and Brownback voters fall to Thompson as the field whittles down, as do McCain voters who just don't like Rudy or Romney, and know their guy won't get there.

9:39

While it's true Fred Thompson initially may siphon votes Romney; Romney will win first in Iowa and his Mitt-mentum will be hard to stop.

You are completely underestimating the fundraising advantage Romney has and the excellent ground teams/organization Romney's had for a long time in many states.

Thompson has no significant record that makes him qualified to lead this
country and after his initial take-off, I believe Thompson will stall & Romney will continue to increase in the polls.

Iowa, New Hampshire, Michigan = Republican nominee 08

You no doubt bring up some very important points, fundraising has to be job one for the thompson team, and Mitt has put together a strong early state organization. I guess the big questions are if the money is there, and if the Romney campaign can hold down their activist base and keep them at home, no defections to Fred. I'm already hearing about a strong team put together in FL, and what's guaranteed to be a nice rollout of endorsements from THompson. Will that turn into activist support, which then equal votes?

Romney's Fl team is at best third string. What have they done?

Romney's Iowa bump is history. Back down to 11%

http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/082307_approval_2008_web.pdf

Anyone knows that the Governor of Massachusetts is a weak governing office. The folks that run the Commonwealth are ensconced in the legislature.

10:04 Romney's Team in FL at best... third string? That's wishful thinking.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

See you in Iowa!

It all begins there.

The Rominator Express... non-stop to Washington D.C.

10:45 Imitating Howard Dean does not become you.

YeeeeeeeEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAHHhhhh

Mitt is the master of straw polls!

FOX NEWS has Romney at 11%

You can perfectly trace the temporary Iowa bump at Real Clear Politics.

Mitt better keep sponsoring straw polls everywhere.


10:58 Howard Dean screamed and I am laughing.

Making incorrect analogies does not become you.

Mitt went to Iowa over 200 times. He has been in FL only 14, just watch.

Anybody that makes fun of Romney's staff is just sad cause they are miserable with their own job and life. His staff is doing a great job considering where his name ID was back in February. I personally know a few of the field staff and they are not only more qualified than Rudy staffers but more educated as well. Remember all you Rudy Fans living in SE Florida and Miami can't vote cause you are independents or democrats.

Name at least one first stringer for Romney if you are able to.

11:06 Look at your 10:45 entry. You essentially quoted Howard Dean verbatim. Look it up and weep.

12:14 nope, I did not.

But I'm still laughing about your original post.

Have a great day.

Not only are we going to New Hampshire, we're going to South Carolina and Oklahoma and Arizona and North Dakota and New Mexico, and we're going to California and Texas and New York … And we're going to South Dakota and Oregon and Washington and Michigan, and then we're going to Washington, D.C., to take back the White House! Byaaah!!!

1:17 that sounds familiar, you sound like Howard Dean!

I mentioned the first 3 primaries where Romney is currently ahead and the final destination for the nominee in 08. That hardly constitutes Dean not that your interpretation matters.

You are embellishing, a liberal trait to be sure.

You want a field staff first stringer or not? And what do you define as first string moron?

Obivously no one can name a first stringer

1:56 Self delusion is precisely what gets folks in trouble. Bet you watch your words more carefuly, else you catch foot in mouth disease again.

Not only are we going to New Hampshire, we're going to South Carolina, Michigan and Florida... And then we're going fold our tent faster than Michael Vick copping a plea agreement. Then we going home to Massachusetts to lick our wounds. Then it is on to Washington with our dog on the roof to watch Rudy and Fred take their oaths of office (and pray that I get offered a cabinet position). Gosh, I love America!!

Nick Hansen, Brandon Patty, Patrick McQuillan

The best you can come up with is three unknown irishmen?

Hmmm... three Romney household names. Romney will definitely win with this trio.

Geez buddy get a life. The guy that probably knows those folks is off the blog now. Instead of being a liberal basher of people that work on another campaign, why don't you direct compliments. Obviously, you support a D or different R. We get it already, you like your staff better, wooopee, great, now get a life, its Friday, get a girlfriend, which I doubt you have, and go hang out with Rudy's 40 year old field staffers with kids.

6:12 I agree with your comments, but there is nothing wrong with 40 year old field staffers. They have more credibility with REC members (most of whom are much older)

The comments to this entry are closed.

About This Blog

From the writers of the St. Petersburg Times, The Buzz offers the latest news in Florida politics. This is a public forum sponsored and maintained by the St. Petersburg Times. When you post comments here, what you say becomes public and could appear in the newspaper. You are not engaging in private communication with candidates or Times staffers.

E-mail Times political editor Adam Smith:
asmith@sptimes.com.

Subscribe to / Bookmark this Blog

Advertisement


Political Connections

Join Times Political Editor Adam Smith and Bay News 9 anchor Al Ruechel as they invite guests to discuss and debate the hot political topics making news, every Sunday on Political Connections.

Latest Stories on PolitiFact.com

CQ Politics Blog

Real Clear Politics Polls

Politics Headlines from the AP