The property tax ruling: Who wins, who loses?
Tampabay.com

Comment Policy

    Please be sure your comments are appropriate before submitting them. Inappropriate comments include content that:
  • Is libelous
  • Is abusive, harassing, or threatening
  • Is obscene, vulgar, or profane
  • Is racially, ethnically or religiously offensive
  • Is illegal or encourages criminal acts
  • Is known to be inaccurate or contains a false attribution
  • Infringes copyrights, trademarks, publicity or any other rights of others
  • Impersonates anyone (actual or fictitious)
  • Solicits funds, goods or services, or advertises
  • The St. Petersburg Times does not edit posts but reserves the right to delete comments that violate our policy.

    Report abuse: abuse@tampabay.com

Or else | Main | FL Yuppies for Rudy and Young Romney in FL »

September 24, 2007

The property tax ruling: Who wins, who loses?

Sp_260576_ho_cover_2

House Speaker Marco Rubio: On one hand, a second stab at tax changes could allow the Miami Republican to push for some of his more ambitious goals (though swapping property taxes for higher sales tax seems to lack momentum, for now). On the other, a highly publicized setback could tarnish the most visible lawmaker on property taxes.

Gov. Charlie Crist: He campaigned on promises to allay growing tension over taxes. Then, late in the session, he laid out his own proposal only to let the Legislature take over. Still Crist has cemented his image to the Jan. 29 proposal. Crist may have to play a more assertive role this time.

Senate President Ken Pruitt. He was not shy about touting tax relief, but the Port St. Lucie Republican mostly allowed Sens. Mike Haridopolos and Daniel Webster to work out a deal, with input from Senate Democrats. Is Pruitt immune or does he have to ensure smooth sailing in the upcoming special session?

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Isn't that Rubio? The Guy who constantly bashes Crist?

The people lose. Poor ruling and the judge should be called on it...

Let's never pose like this again guys. Thanks.

Oh, come on. It's election time, that's why they stalled last time.

Screw the constitutional amendment, the court ruled the state can dictate the property tax rates, read the last few pages of the ruling. Roll them back to 2001 levels, cap them at 3% or 5%, and make the local governments get voter approval to break the cap.

There is no way these guys were smart enough to plan this, but the judge just handed them a potentially enormous victory.

The ruling was fair. The Senate should not have let the House have their way on this legislation. I believe the initial Senate bill could have worked. However, it was so long ago, and there has been so much written about how we were going to be helped, I really can't say for sure. I do know that the proposed plan was very unclear regarding caps, etc.

Pruitt is termed out. He doesn't care.

Crist is made of teflon and what he really wants is a spot on somebody's Presidential ticket.

Rubio - maybe he can pull it together once again. And maybe this time the other two stooges will support him.

Forget the amendment and just roll back to an earlier date and make the counties work for their money.

And make the existing homestead portable.

And roll back the Republican's $500 million education property tax increase.

Good Lord, that has to be the ga*est picture i've ever seen. Please stop the butter.

Speaker
Marco Rubio
&
Speaker-designate Ray Sansom

Cordially Invites you to a
Fundraising reception honoring

Chairman David Rivera
&
CHAIRMAN
Carlos Lopez-Cantera


Governors Club, BC Room

Thursday, September 27th
5:30pm – 6:30pm


Suggested Contribution: $500

Please RSVP to Bridget Nocco at
954.600.7879 or email bridgetgregory@hotmail.com

make checks payable to:
David Rivera Campaign
carlos Lopez-cantera campaign

Political advertisement paid for and approved by David Rivera, Republican for State Representative District 112, Carlos Lopez-Cantera, Republican for State Representative District 113. The purchase of a ticket for, or a contribution to, the campaign fundraiser is a contribution to the campaign of David Rivera and/or Carlos Lopez-Canera. Contributions are not tax deductible.

I'm rubber, you're glue...

Everything bounces off me and sticks to you!

-- Charlie

Hard to tell who is Dumb, who is Dumber, and who is Dumbest from that photo.

Let's give thanks to the judiciary once again for preventing one of the worse ideas in state history.

10:28

Nicely said.

Whoever thought term limits were a good idea is an idiot.

Let's raise taxes to cut them!

marco

Brett Doster is hot !

10:50

Doster...seriously man, get off the blogs.

What's up Peter and Mary? We should get together sometime.

Peter, Paul and Mary...funny! Comic relief if always welcome.

Yes - Make the existing homestead exemption portable! My daughter is off to college and I'm not earning enough as a teacher to keep my three bedroom home - but downsizing doesn't make sense unless the existing homestead is made portable! Make it portable! Keep your promises Charlie! If its portable I can afford to get a smaller house and I can afford to keep teaching in Pinellas. If not, its off to Georgia!!!!!

The Lion, The Tin Man and The Scarecrow

What a joke this is. My tax relief came in the form of an increase of $2700. People aren't going to buy houses and move if the exemption isn't portable. I moved my homestead from orange to volusia and got screwed big time. Local government is trying to inflate values as much as they can to pad the budgets for next year. My taxes doubled in Orange and assessment went up $91,000 in Volusia... even with the homestead exemption. I couldn't sell either house no matter what I priced it. The market sucks, insurance rates suck, interest rates suck, and taxes suck. Thanks for the "relief"

I think we are going about this relief all wrong. I think we ought to vote to force the local government to reduce the millage rate by 75% not the taxable value by same. Without controlling the millage rate, the taxable value is meaningless anyway. For an example, in Pinellas the millage rate is $21. Reducing the rate by 75% the new rate would be $5.25. We all understand that right? East to say. Easy to understand. By doing this, we would not be concerned with portability because our taxes would immediately drop by 75%.

What's the millage rate?

The Legislature does not need a constitutional amendment if it genuinely wants to offer tax relief. The Legislatue could leave folks' local, elected governments alone and reduce the sales tax. Of course that would help all people, especially the lower income who cannot afford to homes, and worse yet would cut into the money the Legislature has to spend instead of somebody else's revenue.

A Pragmatic Post

They look like the freaking Three Stooges… and the joke’s on us.

... and chalk up another photo op for Chuck! At least he's good at that.

I bet I can guess which one's MO!

that is quite possibly the oddest picture i have ever seen. get a room fellas.

Notice Marco “The Rube” Rubio’s thumb capping the ménage… that’s a public bathroom sign for… well, you know.

Lets all remember that this amendemnet going by-by is going to stop these guys from creating another $1billion hole in state revenues. Projections already indicate revenues could be down $2 billion next year. If these guys can't figure out how to agree to cut 1 billion this year, how on earth do you think they could handle a 3 billion hole? Im all for tax cuts, but I have little faith that these guys can make sensible budget cuts that wouldn't harm the people more than high taxes are currently hurting them.

9:04 - know about that kinda stuff, do ya?

my rent just went up 12.5% - when the hell are they going to realize that people are now moving out of the state faster than they are moving in and school enrollment is down across the state - if they keep allowing property taxes to inflate the cost of living, then good bye to FL.

9:53 - don't you... butt pirate?

Judge ruled the statutory part is legal.

Either go with Rubio's plan to eliminate property taxes for 2.5% mor in sales tax

or

just roll back taxes to 2001 & add back in growth & inflation. This can be done statutorily & immediately and would stop the local government's drunken spending spree.

Sweetypie,

Didn't you mean The Liar, The B**ch and The Closet instead of The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe?

10:43 - no i don't - meat flutist

3:10 - took you long enough... having an extra meat-whistle steak for lunch were you?

You can go home to your trophy wife now... I'm done with her.

Vote NO on the amendment and save Save Our Homes.

The comments to this entry are closed.

About This Blog

From the writers of the St. Petersburg Times, The Buzz offers the latest news in Florida politics. This is a public forum sponsored and maintained by the St. Petersburg Times. When you post comments here, what you say becomes public and could appear in the newspaper. You are not engaging in private communication with candidates or Times staffers.

E-mail Times political editor Adam Smith:
asmith@sptimes.com.

Subscribe to | Bookmark this Blog

Advertisement


Political Connections

Join Times Political Editor Adam Smith and Bay News 9 anchor Al Ruechel as they invite guests to discuss and debate the hot political topics making news, every Sunday on Political Connections.

Latest Stories on PolitiFact.com

CQ Politics Blog

Real Clear Politics Polls

Politics Headlines from the AP