McCain: stop the madness

Before heading to three fundraisers in southwest Florida, John McCain this morning bemoaned the "crazy" compressed primary schedule , even as he promised that as the nominee he'd restore all of Florida's delegates to the national convention. He called it "bizarre" to have the Iowa caucuses on Jan. 3. "I mean, we're still recovering."

"I'd restore (Florida's delegates). But I have to tell you I'd also sit down with the Democrat nominee and try to work out a system so we make order out of this chaos,'' said McCain who would supporting keeping IA, NH, and SC as the first elections, followed by regional primaries stretched out over a longer period. "It's now over on Feb. 5, as you know, and we don't the convention until September. It's crazy. It's way too compressed and we've got to sit down and fix it. If the parties won't fix it, then I would suggest congressional action to fix it."

How'd McCain think he did in the debate? "My staff won't show me the bad reviews, only the good reviews, so I'm exhilarated."

Comments

Congress fix it...more freedoms. Give me a break.

[James]

Rudy Giuliani's role in paving the NAFTA Superhighway
Posted November 29th, 2007 by Isaac Lopez
Of course, Ron Paul was the only candidate asked anything about the NAFTA Superhighway (AKA The Texas Trans-National Corridor). Sadly, the candidate on the stage who is profiting the most from this project wasn't asked a single question about it. That's probably because few people know that Rudy Giuliani is practically financing his campaign on it.

Any time you see a reporter erroneously taking Paul to task for his comments on the very real prospect of the NAFTA Superhighway, kindly point them to Manufacturing News & Technology and ask them if the $70 million dollars Giuliani received on the legal work preparing to sell public roads to foreign companies is imaginary.

Another thing you can do is send them to the website of the documentary Truth Be Tolled, to witness the passion of those fighting this thing on the front lines.

Write them and send them to these places when they attack. Ask them if they have done their homework. But why wait for them to attack? We should be peacefully preemptive. Write your local editors; Write your favorite Internet reporter; Ask them if they were aware of the referenced links. Ask them if now is not the time to have a debate about this, when will be the right time?

We need to be providing ground cover to Dr. Paul on this issue. It's the least that we can do for him as he stands up there heroically speaking truth to power.

Here are the referenced links:

Manufacturing & Technology News
Rudy Giuliani Benefits From Sale Of U.S. Highways To Foreign Companies
http://www.manufacturingnews.com/news/07/0615/art2.html

NASCO Corridor Website
http://www.nascocorridor.com/

Documentary: Truth Be Tolled
http://www.truthbetolled.com/trailer-TTC.php

Clinton News Network showed their true colors last night. What a joke.

Here's the thing I don't get about McCain (and I like McCain): How can he stand there with a straight face in these debates and talk about how Congressional spending is out of control and the tax structure is screwed up when, for many years, he has been a powerful U.S. Senator voting in favor of budgets and tax laws?

I have trouble reconciling those two positions, both from the same man who is clearly having an out of body experience.

1:21 Look at his record. He has been the leading Congressional advocate to cut pork barrell spending (to the detriment of his colleagues) and has a consistent record of voting against out of control spending and for tax cuts.

Just because he is a member of Congress doesn't mean he's as bad as the rest of them.

[David M.]

In his attack, John McCain comes off as a blithering idiot, not that many probably noticed. McCain, citing the long ago discredited official history, declared Ron Paul to be an isolationist and World War II the fault of American isolationism, a claim so out of touch with reality as to be speculative fiction.

“Mussolini enjoyed a great deal of admiration in corporate America from the moment he came to power in a coup that was hailed stateside as ‘a fine young revolution,’” writes the historian Jacques R. Pauwels. “In the 1920s many big American corporations enjoyed sizeable investments in Germany…. By the early 1930s, an élite of about twenty of the largest American corporations had a German connection including Du Pont, Union Carbide, Westinghouse, General Electric, Gilette, Goodrich, Singer, Eastman Kodak, Coca-Cola, IBM, and ITT.”

Finally, many American law firms, investment companies, and banks were deeply involved in America’s investment offensive in Germany, among them the renowned Wall Street law firm Sullivan & Cromwell, and the banks J. P. Morgan and Dillon, Read and Company, as well as the Union Bank of New York, owned by Brown Brothers & Harriman. The Union Bank was intimately linked with the financial and industrial empire of German steel magnate Thyssen, whose financial support enabled Hitler to come to power. This bank was managed by Prescott Bush, grandfather of George W. Bush. Prescott Bush was allegedly also an eager supporter of Hitler, funnelled money to him via Thyssen, and in return made considerable profits by doing business with Nazi Germany; with the profits he launched his son, the later president, in the oil business.

In other words, the United States was not isolationist, as McCain claims, but was in bed with fascism. Prescott Bush’s relationship with the Hitler regime is more than an allegation, it is a fact entombed in the U.S. National Archives, although “little of Bush’s dealings with Germany has received public scrutiny, partly because of the secret status of the documentation involving him,” according to Ben Aris and Duncan Campbell, writing for the Guardian. The documents “reveal that the firm [Prescott Bush] worked for, Brown Brothers Harriman (BBH), acted as a US base for the German industrialist, Fritz Thyssen, who helped finance Hitler in the 1930s before falling out with him at the end of the decade. The Guardian has seen evidence that shows Bush was the director of the New York-based Union Banking Corporation (UBC) that represented Thyssen’s US interests and he continued to work for the bank after America entered the war.”

As Robert Lederman notes, the Bush family was far more involved in the banking business of the Nazi regime than even the Guardian would have us believe. “As senior managers of Brown Brothers Harriman, [the Bush family] had to have known that their American clients, such as the Rockefellers, were investing heavily in German corporations, including Thyssen’s giant Vereinigte Stahlwerke. As noted historian Christopher Simpson repeatedly documents, it is a matter of public record that Brown Brother’s investments in Nazi Germany took place under the Bush family stewardship…. The enormous sums of money deposited into the Union Bank prior to 1942 is the best evidence that Prescott Bush knowingly served as a money launderer” for both the Nazis and the Rockefellers. “If Union Bank was not the conduit for laundering the Rockefeller’s Nazi investments back to America, then how could the Rockefeller-controlled Chase Manhattan Bank end up owning 31% of the Thyssen group after the war?”

It should be noted that this money laundering was accomplished under the aegis of Bernhard of Lippe-Biesterfeld, the Dutch monarch, who proudly served in the German Reiter SS Corps. Prince Bernhard also worked for IG Farben, the chemical company married to Standard Oil, that is to say the Rockefellers.

Lederman concludes:

The bottom line is harsh: It is bad enough that the Bush family helped raise the money for Thyssen to give Hitler his start in the 1920’s, but giving aid and comfort to the enemy in time of war is treason. The Bush’s bank helped the Thyssens make the Nazi steel that killed allied soldiers. As bad as financing the Nazi war machine may seem, aiding and abetting the Holocaust was worse. Thyssen’s coal mines used Jewish slaves as if they were disposable chemicals. There are six million skeletons in the Thyssen family closet, and a myriad of criminal and historical questions to be answered about the Bush family’s complicity.

In short, McCain should be accusing the head of his party, George W. Bush, or his family, of causing World War II, not the sort of “isolationism” Ron Paul supposedly advocates. But then, of course, John McCain is a neocon, albeit one who will soon drop from sight in the presidential campaign, as increasing numbers of people realize Ron Paul is the only viable candidate, one who is not so much “isolationist” as dedicated to constitutional principles.

It was George Washington who wisely stated that the country must avoid “foreign entanglements” and “foreign alliances, attachments, and intrigues,” as “overgrown military establishments” are, “under any form of government… inauspicious to liberty, and which are to be regarded as particularly hostile to republican liberty.”

John McCain, however, does not represent “republican liberty,” but instead its obverse: neocon military totalitarianism, both abroad and at home.

Yet another candidate who is going alone with our disenfranchisement, seeing no need to stand and fight for the notion that elections are about counting votes, but who will "reinstate" our votes after they no longer matter.

How dumb does this moron think we are?

Democrats' new slogan: "Count NO vote".