Rubio v. Crist delayed
Tampabay.com

Comment Policy

    Please be sure your comments are appropriate before submitting them. Inappropriate comments include content that:
  • Is libelous
  • Is abusive, harassing, or threatening
  • Is obscene, vulgar, or profane
  • Is racially, ethnically or religiously offensive
  • Is illegal or encourages criminal acts
  • Is known to be inaccurate or contains a false attribution
  • Infringes copyrights, trademarks, publicity or any other rights of others
  • Impersonates anyone (actual or fictitious)
  • Solicits funds, goods or services, or advertises
  • The St. Petersburg Times does not edit posts but reserves the right to delete comments that violate our policy.

    Report abuse: abuse@tampabay.com

FL Dems all over Iowa | Main | Spanish debate "has no place" in campaign »

December 07, 2007

Rubio v. Crist delayed

You'll have to wait a bit longer for the legal showdown between Gov. Charlie Crist and House Speaker Marco Rubio over the gambling compact with the Seminole Tribe. The Florida Supreme Court today moved oral arguments to Jan. 30 from Dec. 12.

Rubio spokeswoman Jill Chamberlin sought to dispel any talk that the schedule change was a defeat for Rubio. "Moving the date for oral arguments to January gives the court time to review deliberately this important case," she said. "The date change has no bearing on how the court will resolve the case. Regardless of what the Dept. of Interior does, our state Supreme Court has the ultimate authority to determine whether the governor validly bound the State to the compact."

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Rubio vs. Crist

I like the sound of it!

Win or lose on the legal case, I also like the sound of that.

Crist 1, Rubio 0. Time to get better lawyers.

Rubio 1, Crist 0. Time to get better lawyers.

Rubio 1

for having a spine and core convictions

Crist 0 (zero)

So, why did the court postpone the oral arguments?

I am so glad to hear that the House of Representatives believes that the state court system actually has a role under the constitution. I didn't hear much of that when the voucher lawsuit was lost.

When the lawsuit proving that the FSE is unconstitutional and/or that the legislature is failing (or certainly will be failing) to meet the requirements for a high quality system of public education that they are similarly complementary of the court's role in our democracy.

Those of you who happily post the "Crist vs. Rubio" nonsense - believing it gives Crist the upper hand - what do you expect Crist to do when the Courts rule in favor of the House's position?

I would suspect that the compact would then be submitted to the Legislature for their "approval" or rejection. They would have to face the fact that if there is no compact that the US Dept of Interior will give the Indians the very same gambling without any funding coming to the state. So, I would enjoy watching that debate.

Rubio 2 for taking on Crist the democrat

The comments to this entry are closed.

About This Blog

From the writers of the St. Petersburg Times, The Buzz offers the latest news in Florida politics. This is a public forum sponsored and maintained by the St. Petersburg Times. When you post comments here, what you say becomes public and could appear in the newspaper. You are not engaging in private communication with candidates or Times staffers.

E-mail Times political editor Adam Smith:
asmith@sptimes.com.

Subscribe to | Bookmark this Blog

Advertisement


Political Connections

Join Times Political Editor Adam Smith and Bay News 9 anchor Al Ruechel as they invite guests to discuss and debate the hot political topics making news, every Sunday on Political Connections.

Latest Stories on PolitiFact.com

CQ Politics Blog

Real Clear Politics Polls

Politics Headlines from the AP