If those FL Dem delegates get restored...
...Here's how the 210 delegates would be divvied up based on 1/29, as calculated FL DNC member Jon Ausman: Clinton: 105; Obama: 67; Edwards: 13; unpledged: 3; Super delegates: 22.
And if they don't get restored, and we face a brokered convention? Florida will once again be in the center of an electoral mess. Stay tuned.





It wasnt easy figuring this out. You all can thank me later - Sammi
Posted by: SAMMI1953 | February 03, 2008 at 11:51 PM
Adam,
Posting during the Super Bowl? Get a life!
Posted by: | February 04, 2008 at 01:15 AM
Wow...same sn as the S&M sites. No "with respect?" When will this loony lib disgrace ever go away?
Adam, I wouldn't exactly call it an electoral mess. Seeing two Democratic candidates that are acting presidential in every way (at least in the last debate), a campaign running all the way to the convention can only benefit the Democratic Party by getting them much more media attention.
It's also been passed around political circles that you're slightly Republican-leaning in your coverage. I think the truth about your approach can best be paraphrased from a Muhammad Ali quote: "[Smith] you ain't nothin' but an instigator."
Posted by: | February 04, 2008 at 06:27 AM
and right now Obama leads the delegate count by less than the spread between he and Clinton in Florida... so if that lead remains the same, why would he seat Florida's delegates?
Posted by: | February 04, 2008 at 06:54 AM
A more important question is why would Sen. Clinton seat Florida's delegates? Oh yeah, because she won an uncontested race. If the outcome were different, you wouldn't be hearing a peep out of her as it relates to counting all votes. She would also like to seat Michigan's delegates, where she went up against "uncommitted." Florida is a means to a Clinton end, it's that simple.
Posted by: | February 04, 2008 at 07:38 AM
Clinton also realizes that completely hosing the Florida delegation isn't the smartest political strategy when November comes around. When it comes to Florida, the Democrats cut off their nose to save their face.
Posted by: UF Student | February 04, 2008 at 08:25 AM
Jon- What happened to Kucinich?
Posted by: Kucinich/Gravel '08 | February 04, 2008 at 08:47 AM
Completely hosing meaning after agreeing to completely hose the Florida delegation and seeing a political opportunity, seizing said opportunity. I do like the slogan: Hillary Clinton! She didn't completely hose Florida. Nice.
Posted by: | February 04, 2008 at 09:46 AM
I think the Democratic candidates cut off their Florida to save their Iowa and New Hampshire.
Posted by: | February 04, 2008 at 09:47 AM
9:46
Don't worry, I'm not voting for either Clinton or Obama. But Obama couldn't say anymore times than he did that he basically hates Florida, at least Clinton made her last minute attempt to be nice.
Posted by: UF Student | February 04, 2008 at 10:00 AM
Not worried, but he took the same pledge Clinton did. You may think it's true love, but I sense something else. She didn't come around because of a belief in justice, but because of an opportunity. You agree?
Posted by: | February 04, 2008 at 10:13 AM
Agreed, but out of the two I am bothered by Obama's complete and under disgust for Florida, and how proud he was to ignore Florida.
Posted by: UF Student | February 04, 2008 at 11:05 AM
Fools. I hope Hillary sues the DNC right before the convention to seat her MI and FL delegates. You can always count on Dems to be their own worst enemies.
Posted by: | February 04, 2008 at 11:08 AM
ABC (Anyone But Clinton)
Posted by: | February 04, 2008 at 04:46 PM