Abortion ultrasound bill fails on a tie vote

Left- Senator Daniel Webster-R, Winter Garden, reacts to the 20-20 tie vote on his abortion bill in the Senate, Wednesday. His bill was defeated.  Scott Keeler | Times

The vote was a stunning rebuke for the bill's sponsor, Senate Majority Leader Dan Webster, R-Winter Garden, who's in the final week of an impressive 28-year legislative career. The decision also spares Gov. Charlie Crist a politically tough decision of whether to sign or veto the bill (SB 2400). The self-described "live and let live" governor has not said what he would have done, at a time when he is mentioned as a possible vice presidential pick. 

The floor debate on both sides was among the most emotional and eloquent of the session, as Webster spoke of a woman overseas who had pregancy complications but refused to abort a fetus -- who became Heisman-trophy winning quarterback Tim Tebow at the University of Florida.

A supporter, Sen. Ronda Storms (left), R-Brandon, wondered why opponents didn't want pregnant women to "see that little baby sucking his thumb," and Sen. Alex Diaz de la Portilla, R-Miami, said the ultrasound is simply one more piece of information. "God forbid a woman may change her mind," he said.

Seven Republicans voted no: Mike Bennett, Lisa Carlton, Paula Dockery, Dennis Jones, Jim King, Evelyn Lynn and Burt Saunders. Democrat Gary Siplin voted yes.

"Unless we ovulate," King said, "we have no place making decisions affecting women's reproductive rights." He said the bill, with its ultrasound provision, tramples on the Republican Party principle of "less government, more freedom."

Several opponents said the bill interferes with the doctor-patient relationship. They also cited the Legislature's decision to eliminate adoption subsidies in a tight budget year, which will make it harder for unwanted foster children to be placed with families. "From the looks of our budget, we can't seem to afford the children we already have," said Sen. Mandy Dawson, D-Fort Lauderdale.

Comments

The same ones who voted against involvement in the Schiavo case. I feel bad for Sen. Webster. I guess the Atwater attack ads will start today in his district.

Webster, Fascano, Pruitt, Posey, Rubio, Hasner, Sansom - none coud care less about children or their families!

Oink, oink, oink - all they are interested in is proctecting CSX, St. Joe Paper Company, and all their PORK!!!!

This is sad. Abortion is wrong in all cases where the pregnancy is inconvenient. When will common sense prevail, because it sure didn't with this vote.

Yes, God Forbid our do-nothing Governor actually have to make up his mind on any issue. The ONLY thing he is good at is photo ops.

Mandy Dawson actually said that?!? We can't afford the ones we have now, so killing children is a money saver?? That's the most disgusting thing I've heard so far this Session.

[Kenneth]

Next thing you know, some wack job conservative will propose legislation requiring that you name the fetus before having an abortion.

THANKYOU!THANKYOU!THANKYOU!

it is a wonderful thing to know that some illiterate, inarticulate, drooling, backwoods, racist, mysoginist moron from upstate repiglicana WILLNOT be involved a womans PRIVATE,PERSONAL decisons!

THANKYOU!THANKYOU!THANKYOU!

We should have elected Randall Terry to represent District 8. At least he has a spine. I find it sickening how these legislators can oppose a measure that is designed to educate women on the issue. It's a sad day when our legislature is trying to prevent a woman from choosing to give birth to her child.

Thank you Senator King for compromising those convictions of your constituents that got you elected.

Kenneth... would have lots of death certificates with the name Spot on them...

12"41 - I would venture to guess that Senator King did in fact vote for the convictions of the majority of his constituents... otherwise Randall Terry would have been elected.

[steve]

I'm so glad these bible thumping idiots who tried to pass a moral bill in which the only intent was to guilt a woman into not having an abortion was vetoed. This bill was to inform women of all her options...Please. What a woman chooses to do with her body is her own decision.

Sen. Ronda Storms, R-Brandon, wondered why opponents didn't want pregnant women to "see that little baby sucking his thumb,"

…What a freaking nutjob this split-tail is. Hey Storms!… ask you boys Dubya and Dickey how many parents miss seeing their 18, 19, and 20-year old children they sent to Iraq on a lie?

Sen. Alex Diaz de la Portilla, R-Miami, said the ultrasound is simply one more piece of information. "God forbid a woman may change her mind," he said.

… God forbid you dopes should actually do something in Tallahassee other than trucknuts, toilet paper, and dumping 700-million tax dollars to your friends at CSX!

"Unless we ovulate," King said, "we have no place making decisions affecting women's reproductive rights."

… I’ve got to give him that one.

They also cited the Legislature's decision to eliminate adoption subsidies in a tight budget year, which will make it harder for unwanted foster children to be placed with families.

… and in there lay the political hypocrisy of it all.

Please, please, please – for the sake of our world… VOTE ALL OF THESE IDIOTS OUT!

My body, my choice. I don't think anyone should interfere with that. Guilting a woman into carrying and birthing a child she doesn't want is just terrible. There are too many children of the state already...why force someone to add to that? I'm glad it failed.

it is a wonderful thing to know that some illiterate, inarticulate, drooling, backwoods, racist, mysoginist moron from upstate repiglicana WILLNOT be involved a womans PRIVATE,PERSONAL decisons!

Wow, except for "upstate," your comment describes the South Florida Democratic Representatives almost perfectly.

Mind your own business! THANK YOU, THANK YOU THANK YOU!!!!!!!

The Republican Party of Florida cares for the unborn. But after you are born, they don't give a damn.

I had to read the last paragraph three times because it is simply unbelievable. It is stating that a tight budget warrants killing babies.

[Louis]

I would support this bill if it had the provision of requiring by law, that all American African males have vasectomies at the age of 14… until such time that the AA community reduces its 70% out-of-wedlock birth rate.

This is typical Floriduuuh politics. Force women to have babies, but destroy childcare and education programs. “We care about children, so we’ll force you to have them… then you’re on you own.”

Amen Jim King! Now if only we could find a way to turn our attention to the SPERM DONORS and justify why it is alright for them to abort the raising of their children. We continue to look to the women for responsibility of conception. HELLO.....last time I checked it takes two to make a baby. Where are all these fathers making good on their decisions?

1:19 - now now... sperm donors are just participating in a commodity transaction...

[d]

It strikes me as odd ... the anti abortionist are interested in a baby until it is out of the womb. after that it's on it's own.
They are not interested in educating the young on the benefits of birth control or give counseling to young women who are coming of age.
abstinence is a good thing but not the only thing...

[Linda]

Unforuntely they are correct that Government doesn't belong in personal decisions. However, Information isn't a bad thing and isn't making the choice to abort or not that would still be the Woman's decision.
Shame on you for keeping Women in the dark on this subject!

I personally adopted two babies here in Florida and I thank those women everyday of my life for the sacrafice they made to NOT abort!!!

I am so happy this did not pass! It is funny to see how hypocritical Repubs are, force woman to keep an unwanted child that will then end up in an underfunded welfare program. That makes complete sense!

Praise the Lord!

1:19 - 1:25 again... kinda like crude oil... without another process/step/factor... crude oil does us no good.

Then why should I as a father be forced to pay child support? When I made a concious decision to have intercourse with the girl, I did not want a baby, and don't think that I should have to pay for it just because she decided to have it. Its NOT just her choice.

What's that you said? I should be personally responsible for my actions? You mean to tell me that because two consenting adults made the decision to have sex, that we should both be responsible for that child? I was told that's what the government was for... To be responsible for me on my behalf.

Doesn't really add up does it?

[Steve]

Hooray! The Democrats, otherwise known as the sound-minded people prevailed. It's nice to see Florida progress and not regress. Ronda Storms - go crawl back in your hole.

Steve, can't give Democrats sole credit for killing this one...

And if it were not for Siplin, you could have given Republicans sole credit for pushing it...

This is obviously a very touchy subject. I am a 20 year old male, so being on the outside of this situation looking in this is completely assanine.

The bill that is. Most of you people going for the bill have obviously never been in that type of situation and for you to judge so quikly is ignorant on your part.

You have no idea how hard it is to go with that decision nor do I. I would much rather have someone go through with an abortion than raise a kid in a household that cant afford for the child and not have all the advantages most of you take for granted.

Please for a moment push religous beliefs to the side and think of this.

King was briliant. And the sen. who talked about a Yale art project with abortions never mentioned that it's an urban myth, just like she didn't mention other things that didn't suit her argument.
King has a lot to teach some of those new members.

Kings constituents had a choice themselves in the last election, when pro-lifer Randall Terry was defeated by big numbers. They chose King. The rest of the state should send them all a big thank you.

[Rosie]

I thought the bill was just to have a ultrasound, her decision to abort would still be up to her. Are these comments saying if she see it she would decide it is a life and keep it instead. What are you saying keep her in the dark so she doesn't know, so she can believe it just a piece of mass. The logic in the comments are strange.

[jack]

FloriDUH!

[Kenneth]

There's so much that we pro-choice, and you pro-lifers could do to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies (and thus the number of abortions) if we could work together. Unfortunately all we get from our Reps is black and white with no gray areas.

Look at it this way… each newborn child enters this country already with 45K debt attached, thanks to Dubya and Dickey’s war. The more kids we have, the lesser our individual debt… see?

OK parents (and non parents) get busy screwing like… well, like the government has been doing to us for decades… we’re 4000+ behind already.

Webster's speech was eloquent and reasonable. His bill simply gave patients more information. How hypocritical that people who claim to care about womens' health want them making decisions with LESS information instead of MORE.

Dawson did indeed make that argument - and so did Jim King. "The state is already paying for too many unwanted kids." Think about what they are saying. That is truly repulsive. We need more Websters in the Legislature and less cynical creeps. No names.

Thank you for your input 1:54... errr... STAFFER!

NOW, GET BACK TO WORK WASTING TIME AND STEALING MY TAXES... PUNK!

It is a simple fact that there ARE too many unwanted kids, and the state IS paying for them. That is sad, but it is a fact, and there's nothing sinister about it, just sad.
It would be so much better to do more to prevent unwanted pregnancies, but the extremists refuse to allow that.

1:54

was there anything in the budget to pay for these required ultrasounds?

How ignorant all of you are who talk about providing the woman with information. All she has to do is ask her doctor questions. By law, he or she has to answer any medical question she has. If she doesn't have information, it's because she didn't ask. As far as being hypocritical, which party is cutting health care benefits for children. Which party has placed barriers in front of all people adopting children.

Give me a break.

How ignorant all of you are who talk about providing the woman with information. All she has to do is ask her doctor questions. By law, he or she has to answer any medical question she has. If she doesn't have information, it's because she didn't ask. As far as being hypocritical, which party is cutting health care benefits for children. Which party has placed barriers in front of all people adopting children.

Give me a break.

Webster loses on Schiavo and now his abortion bill.
I guess God doesn't love Senator Webster.

[Mike]

It just gives me great pleasure to see Storms on the losing side of a bill. When she loses, we all win. By the way, when are a bunch of old and fat men going to stop having control over women's uteruses?

That would be the Party of "conservative" values and actions... ummm... HA!

What if we let the homertesticles and lesbotarians adopt children… would that help?

2:17 - why would the people from Lesbos Greece want to adopt our unwanted children?

In fact, every state in this nation allows gay couples to adopt, except Flori-DUH. Beats the heck out of orphanages and foster care.

IMHO STFU MYOB!

1:42, It's NOT an "urban legend"...

http://www.yaledailynews.com/articles/view/24532

[Kay]

There is already nothing stopping a woman from having this information if she so chooses. There is no need to force it - women are not idiots!

[Amy]

RE: April 30, 2008 at 12:44 PM

I could not have said it better myself!

2:31 - Yes, it was.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/A/ART_HOAX?SITE=FLTAM&SECTION=US

[keep your laws off my body]

My grandma used to say, take all the babies that would have been born if abortion were illegal, put them on the steps of the capital and let the MEN figure out how to raise 'em! Stupid men, want their fun and then try to force the repercussion on someone else.

[Rene]

YAY!

2:41 Thinks Rhonda Storms is a man.

[Alejandra]

I had an abortion. The facility I chose did an ultrasound to verify the age of the embryo, I asked to see it, much to the surprise of the technologist. Guess what, it didn't change my mind. I believe for 99 percent of the women, it won't matter.

By the way, can we put through a bill requiring abortion protestors to adopt an unwanted child?

It IS an urban myth, or hoax, or whatever you want to call it. Check tthe newer google stories.

[Erie]

I am so glad this didn't pass. Having an abortion is one of the most difficult decisions a person can make. To be forced to have an ultrasound, within an unfunded mandate, would only make a very challenging decision even more agonizing. LEAVE OUR BODIES OUT OF POLITICS. Find a real issue to grip about.

[Tom]

I am sick of hearing from all of the so called righteous people who claim that abortion is murder. Yet when it comes to supporting these children they speak foully of those who seek welfare assistance. You stupid people have no idea what a woman goes through when she makes this very private and personal decision. If you really care so much about children, then adopt a couple of dozen and give them a decent life; I know you won't unless they are lily white like yourselves. You are a bunch of hypocrites who don't deserve the right so speak at all. You don't want contraception to be taught in schools; yet you don't want abortions. May the Lord and True God Lucifer have pity upon your souls in his house; for you are forever dammed for your sins. Greedy scum all of you!

I thought an "ultrasound" was what you got when you bought that new BOSE system!

I think Rhonda Storms is hot... girly-girl got back!

It is interesting that no one has responded to the point 1:32 makes.

This is not just a womens issue, it is a societal issue. Amazing how hypocritical the pro-abortion side is on this aspect of the issue.

If we are going to have a society of Murphy Browns and chidren who do not take their fathers last name then for goodness sakes square the circle and do away with the antiquated notion of child support.

2:14 Careful, you are mocking God. Eternity is forever, this life is the blink of an eye. God has the last word on anyone's actions including holding those accountable for the loss of life which could have been prevented.

The road to you know where is paved with good intentions,compromises and lack of convictions.
But the road to Eternal life in narrow.
Senator Webster did the right thing, He's honorable, a statesman and gave the bill his best shot. Way to go Dan, thanks for your leadership and moral courage.

[A.H.]

"Unless we ovulate," King said, "we have no place making decisions affecting women's reproductive rights."
---------------------
Finally, someone with half a brain is in Tallahassee. Our bodies, our choice. Plain and simple.

And I have to agree with Tom at 3:08pm. Unless you "conservatives" plan on raising those unable-to-be-cared for children yourselves, shut up!

3:39 - okay if it's your choice to abort - then what happens if you choose NOT to abort and the father wanted you too, is he still forced to have to pay child support? seems like the women win on every angle of this issue

We should have stopped them at burning bras!

Great, you burned your bra... not get in the damn kitchen and make me a sandwich. And bring me a beer while you're at it, the game's on... AND DO SOME DAMN LAUNDRY TOO!

Steve,

The vote was a "stunning rebuke;" can you cloak your objecitvely a little more?

What? The regular Democrats (posing as Republicans) voted with the Democrats again what a surprise, NOT!
And Steve, if we're in such a tough budget year why are we having another Global Warming Summit in Miami?

Maybe Arnold Schwarzennegar will speak again and bring some of his friends from Communist China and the U.N. to reach out to us.

I thought "Global Warming" was gay code for t-bagging!

Why are there those who insist on this "don't tell me what to do with my body" or "anyone without a uterus should not have a say in the matter"? That is a pathetic juvenille approach. Once a life is terminated there are no other postitive options for the unborn child who will have to endure the physical pain of the abortion and have its life ended. Carrying a child to term preserves many options. Men are held to financial responsibilty so they should have a say in the matter especially considering the woman picked them to have sex with. And no one is telling the woman to have sex in the first place.

For all of you who keep trying to tie abortion and less government funded social services together explain why you think that only good productive lives start out on silver platters and everyone born on one lives a quality life?

After you give up on trying to respond to that one in a reasonable manner have a go at explaining why you think the government should stand in place of parents to provide the necessities of life for children.

Don't stop swinging yet you only have two strikes. How can two people representing themselves as mature enough to participate in sexual behavior justify not preventing pregnancy or accepting responsibility for it in a way that does not demonstrate a devalued sense humanity?

Answer me this, 3:59… spermatozoa is a living organism… why not make it illegal to self-serve?

Don’t laugh; I’m totally serious. If it’s all about life, then why not “all” levels of life?

... anyone... anyone... Bueller... Bueller... Bueller...

... logic always kills the freaks.

4:31 - well, what 4:06 stated hardly counts as logic - a sperm is not a human life, an egg is not a human life, neither individually contains the DNA to call it a human life - but i don't have time for a biology lesson for you

[Bella]

It sounds like a lot of men blogging here! Ok here I go from my womanly perspective....

I have to admit that I have had several friends who have had abortions, many during their college years. For the most part all of them were under 12 weeks and still had a sonogram performed. Most clinics already factor in the cost of a sonogram with an abortion before and after 12 weeks. Back then it was about $350. If I were to have an abortion I would feel more comfortable knowing that the physician is taking the proper steps necessary to determine the best method (out of 3) to perform. To me this would ensure high standards are in place in the medical field. I believe if our legislators approached it more from a medical perspective it would have gained more support.

For example:

1 - What if I had a tubal (ectopic) pregnancy, sometimes undetected until 8 weeks? If the doctor failed to perform a sonogram and went on to perform an abortion I would be headed to the ER later on for surgery....thus wasting my time and money.

2 - What if I was unaware of my last menstrual cycle, which helps calculate the gestation period (many women have irregular cycles) or if lied about the date because I did not want my boyfriend to figure out I cheated? If the doctor failed to perform a sonogram not knowing I could be past 12 weeks & performed a suction aspiration rather than a D&C or D&E I would be headed to the ER for hemorrhaging in which they would have to complete the procedure.

3 - Each pregnancy is different. The early stages of a 2nd pregnancy tend to enlarge quicker than the first since the flexibility of the uterus. Trust me I know, I have 3 kids myself. That's why some women start showing sooner than others even though they share the same due date. So what if I was 11 weeks yet my fetus was slightly larger than the average and the doctor went ahead and performed a suction aspiration? If a sonogram were performed first the doctor would be able to determine that perhaps a more rigorous method would have been effective rather then having to go back.

4 - Has anyone done a poll asking women if they were more likely to keep a baby at 12 weeks versus 6 weeks after a sonogram was performed? In order not to interject my personal opinions I have asked several women including some of those friends who had abortions that question. Many of them explained that it would be more difficult to go through with an abortion after 12 weeks because in a sonogram the fetus begins to show more human characteristics during that stage.

With what I explained above, it is no different to extend the medical regulation from the 12th week to the 1st in order to ensure high standards and quality in the medical field.

Well done, 4:40… rationalization of irrational logic… so… life isn’t life, even if it moves with a purpose. Good think thing we recognizes the darkies, jews, women, and pole-smokers are humans, huh?

[John]

4:06

I THINK I LOVE YOU!!

Is Storms pregnant?

4:48 - 4:40 here - um, first of all there's no such thing as irrational logic - and second there are all kinds of life that are not human life

and just because it "moves with a purpose" it is not human life (that's got to be the stupidest definition of human life i've ever read) - bugs move with a purpose you gonna tell me that's a human life?

[MarkMarsh]

Yeah, wrinkled old white dudes get one less chance to mess with women undergoing a really tough time in their lives.

Yes, Ron(duh) Storms was a man at one time. Look at the adam's apple.

4:53… 4:48 here. Lighten up, freak. I asked a reasonable question, and you retort indicates feelings of inadequacy on your part.

So if I kill the bee, before it pollinates the flower… what have I killed; the bee or the flower?

Is that Senator Ronda Storms in the picture? Her hair-do looks similar to that of the the Mormon sect (YFZ) women out in West Texas!

oooo oooo birds and bees time...

Storms is the same one who doesn't want to talk about condoms in school. Why does she hate teenage girls?

[ginger]

I have always liked Jim King...and the "Unless we ovulate" comment makes me like him even more.

[Marc]

Thank goodness this useless right-wing driven session is almost over...way too much on the God, Guns and Gays. Enough already, get to work fixing the real issues.

Thank goodness Rhonda is looking really fat in that picture. Maybe she will get sick and retire. Rhonda, I don't really believe in your freakish right-wing God, but I will say a prayer for you to quit anyways.

[LJ]

From what I understand, pretty much all abortions are already preceded by ultrasounds, so the proposed legislation wouldn't really have changed anything. It was just politics and had nothing to do with women's health or any desire to provide them with "information." The real issue is to what extent should our state lawmakers be legislating every detail of our lives. I think abortion should be as rare as a black swan, but this is not the way to make that happen.

Doing their constitutional duty and responsibility.

Kill unconstitutional legislation.

LJ how should we do it then?

Thank you Thank you Thank you to the legislators with a brain and b a l l s. Thank you for staying out of my personal life. Thank you for freedom. This was not an abortion bill. The law of the land allows abortion, this bill was to strip more of our freedoms and does not allow us to make up our own minds about our most personal times. I am so glad that my life was not intruded upon by the likes of a Rhonda Storms. She does not believe that you can make your own decisions. She and the others like her believe it should not be about family empowerment, but instead believe that some legislator should be the one to decide what is right and wrong for you and your entire family. Sounds so much like the Middle East. Next thing you know they will have women in Burkas. Thank God there are legislators, even prolife legislators, who understand what this bill was really about. Uphold the Constitution Webster, Fasano, Storms, Alexander, Baker, Peaden, and the rest who want to intrude in my life.

I thought the comments made against this bill were great. I was cheering from my computer room. I have been at a point in my life where I thought politicians all stink. And Republicans who are thought to favor less government, have certainly been the ones to intrude the most. But after watching this debate and listening to great comments by the senators who opposed the bill, I have renewed faith. The proponents of the bill had the worst explanations for why they thought the bill was necessary. They were awful. One even said it was necessary because abortion doctors would not allow the women to have ultra sounds. This was so untrue and very lame. Rhonda Storms used a incident that was proved to be a hoax. I was proud that the bill was exposed for what it really is. Can you imagine leaving moral decisions up to some of these legislators? The public rates them so low. I dont want them deciding these things for me. I dont want them taking away my freedoms.

What did the story about the women over seas whos son grew up to be a football player have to do with this bill? This was not a ban on abortion. The same way that woman made up her mind to keep her child, we should let her and her family make up their minds. The bill subjects a woman who may even have a malformed child to have to be asked if she wants to see it. Bad bad bill

Ronda Storms is just another extremeist who could care less about individual rights and freedoms. She does not allow others to differ on when a fetus is viable. I can respect her opinion, but she cannot accept mine or anyone elses.

[Heidi]

Here's why Republicans want to force women to have their unwanted children then cut all programs to help them once the baby is born:

They want live babies so they can have dead soldiers.

The consensus is that Storms is pregnant. That does not excuse her behavior, many of not most women continue to think clearly during pregnancy, but there are always exceptions.

Gaaawley! Gomer Tebow from Gainesville RFD is a Republican. Who woulda thunk it?

I'm very confused, many of you, men and women alike i'm sure, sound like women, some potentially very young, shouldn't need all of the information before making what is repeatedly called such a difficult decision in such a difficult time. If they were all so "capable" regardless of age or status, why do so many end up pregnant and need to abort in the first place?

Many of you, including the Jim King's of this world, are parents. How often do you argue that your children should be able to make bad decisions without consequences or better yet, without even being told exactly what the consequences are? Once you abort, there is NO undoing the pain that you suffer for the rest of your life. Any woman that says she doesn't regret the decision to abort is trying to cover up her true feelings.

And those that use the childish "dead soldier" and "they don't care about you once you are born" logic, well, you lack any facility to truly argue with reason.

There are a dozen ways to prevent unwanted pregnancy yet you continue to defend a "woman's" right to ignore those options so long as she can clean up her mess after the fact.

And why do so many of you think that if you keep an unwanted baby it is the government's responsibility to raise it? Did your parents feel that way too? What ever happended to personal responsibility?

If just one woman changes her mind because she realizes after seeing the sonogram that her baby is real, is a human, is alive in that sonogram picture, isn't that worth the cost of every additional sonogram that taken? We know what Mandy Dawson's answer would be, but what else would you expect from a democrat from my home town? I will add you all to my prayers, your hatred is painful to read and listen to. God Bless You!

1:54 stop twisting the truth. We all watched what took place. Dawson and King did not say it the way you twist it. They spoke the truth in saying that there are so many babies and far too few hypocrites voulnteering to help them now.

[K_jengurl]

these bozos said that this bill would require a woman to receive appropriate information just as she would for any other medical procedure. they obviously weren't in the hospital with me when the dr said i needed a pacemaker, said he'd scheduled it for the next morning and started to walk out the room without giving me anymore information. what a crock!! a woman can get the info the same way i did with that doc. i stopped him, made him sit down and explain

Stop the attempt to have governemnt compelled pregnancy.

Is RhonDUH pregnant? Give her an ultrasound. Check her out for babies in the belly and an adam's apple.

9:30 sounds like they're saying that someone who makes the bad decision that results in pregnancy should be forced to bear a child as "consequences". What kind of lie is that, when the child is considered punishment? Is that the kind of life you'd wish on someone?
And people seem to forget how many pregnancies result not from carelessness or unprotected sex, but from failed birth control.
Yes women do regret abortions, but it's better than raising an unwanted , unloved child--and don't even talk about adoption, with all the kids waiting out there and needing homes .

[Omega83]

Where is the Republican Party I so used to admire?

That would be the GOP of Eisenhower, Goldwater, Ford...

NOT Bush, DeLay, Santorum, et al...