Senate relaxes rules on itself
Tampabay.com

Comment Policy

    Please be sure your comments are appropriate before submitting them. Inappropriate comments include content that:
  • Is libelous
  • Is abusive, harassing, or threatening
  • Is obscene, vulgar, or profane
  • Is racially, ethnically or religiously offensive
  • Is illegal or encourages criminal acts
  • Is known to be inaccurate or contains a false attribution
  • Infringes copyrights, trademarks, publicity or any other rights of others
  • Impersonates anyone (actual or fictitious)
  • Solicits funds, goods or services, or advertises
  • The St. Petersburg Times does not edit posts but reserves the right to delete comments that violate our policy.

    Report abuse: abuse@tampabay.com

Speaker Sansom: 'It's not about us' | Main | Sen. Jeff Atwater elected Senate president »

November 18, 2008

Senate relaxes rules on itself

The Senate just relaxed a lot of the rules on its members, relaxing or wiping out some of the tougher requirements that came with the Tom Lee administration.

Senators made it easier to vote with conflicts of interest, easier to dismiss complaints against themselves and gave themselves more time to report money raised and spent in their political committees.

They now don't have to register their affiliation with a 527, the second they register the committee, just as "required by law." They also don't have to create "immediate" Web sites anymore -- just create them promptly. And they don't have to report expenditures and money raised to their committees within 10 days anymore.

The rules also make it easier to have conflicts of interest by declaring that a senator absolutely "is not disqualified from voting on a measure" when there's a conflict on interest, as long as they declare they could personally benefit.

They made it harder to file a complaint against a senator. The complaint must be based on "personal knowledge" and it gives all committee chairs, the rule chair and the president the ability to dismiss it, if they don't find "probable cause."

Read the rule changes here.

Check out rule 1.361, 1.39 and 1.42.

Jennifer Liberto, Times staff writer

*

 

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

"...They made it easier to vote with conflicts of interest, easier to dismiss complaints against themselves and gave themselves more time to report money raised and spent in their political committees..."
WOW!
Can we have a revote?

these freakin' moron piglicans dont seem to have a CLUE, do they?

a hefty part of the reason they LOST so big nationally is because they acted like the CRIMINALS they are!!

TRUST US, WE ARE NOT CROOKS!!

How did the Democrats in the Senate vote? Publish the votes.

looks like these guys didn't learn much from Obama's election.
"yeah, we'll show em, we'll really screw the taxpayers and voters now, they can't mess with the Florida Senate"!
you guys are headed down a slippery slope to oblivion with wrong headed thinking like this.

voice vote

10:36 - They had to do something to help the convict Siplin, (i love you Josh).

Slime ascendant.

Now just calm down. Why should we Republicans have to be honest and follow any rules. You fools put us in office so that means we can do what ever we want. If we had rules and regulations where do you think this country would be? Not in the shape it is now. We need high unemployment, low education, high taxes for the middle class, people to live in fear and thank us for the bone we toss them every so often. If we didn't have these things you people would want to share my wealth and that's not going to happen in Florida. So come on fools lets keep voting Republican. Hey maybe ABC could use Florida politics as it's newest sitcom. I'd loooooooove to see all this on my HD TV while you stand in the unemployment line.

Pathetic. Maybe anything to do with representative oversight (on both a federal and state level) ought to be decided by the voting public. Including pay raises and everything else. No wonder this country is in such poor shape. Ethics? What are those? Oh, that's right, if you are in politics, YOU AREN'T REQUIRED TO HAVE ANY.

Excuse me, ms "piglican" commenter I think the jackass members voted for it too.

Win one election, and already they're above whatever rules they had in the first place. That kind of arrogance comes back in ways they won;t like.

And when were these issues spoken about on the campaign trail?

The comments to this entry are closed.

About This Blog

From the writers of the St. Petersburg Times, The Buzz offers the latest news in Florida politics. This is a public forum sponsored and maintained by the St. Petersburg Times. When you post comments here, what you say becomes public and could appear in the newspaper. You are not engaging in private communication with candidates or Times staffers.

E-mail Times political editor Adam Smith:
asmith@sptimes.com.

Subscribe to | Bookmark this Blog

Advertisement


Political Connections

Join Times Political Editor Adam Smith and Bay News 9 anchor Al Ruechel as they invite guests to discuss and debate the hot political topics making news, every Sunday on Political Connections.

Latest Stories on PolitiFact.com

CQ Politics Blog

Real Clear Politics Polls

Politics Headlines from the AP