news & archive search
Keyword 
Site   Archives   Web      

Comment Policy

    Please be sure your comments are appropriate before submitting them. Inappropriate comments include content that:
  • Is libelous
  • Is abusive, harassing, or threatening
  • Is obscene, vulgar, or profane
  • Is racially, ethnically or religiously offensive
  • Is illegal or encourages criminal acts
  • Is known to be inaccurate or contains a false attribution
  • Infringes copyrights, trademarks, publicity or any other rights of others
  • Impersonates anyone (actual or fictitious)
  • Solicits funds, goods or services, or advertises
  • The St. Petersburg Times does not edit posts but reserves the right to delete comments that violate our policy.

« March 7, 2007 | Main | March 14, 2007 »

March 13, 2007

Oops, I forgot

During his testimony, psychologist Robert Berland tried to explain why John Couey was not given a current IQ test until a few days before the trial -- even though he was hired by the defense in 2005.

He said he had administered a 1955 version of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale to Couey in July of 2006. This was to assess the defendant for brain damage, not IQ, he said, which was why he used an outdated test.

Couey scored an 85. A 70 is generally considered the cutoff for mental retardation.

However, because IQ tests become outdated around every decade, that means the score of 85 should probably be reduced by around 10 points to become accurate, Berland said. That would put Couey at 75, within the margin of error for the retardation cutoff.

But Berland said the idea of assessing Couey for retardation didn't occur to him until he came across an old "quick and dirty" Department of Corrections test that put Couey's IQ at 71.

"Oh my gosh," he said he responded. We'll have to assess Couey using a current test.

Then, Berland claims, he forgot about it.

Until a week before the trial.

"Something reminded me" he said, and he hurriedly contacted Dr. Richard Carpenter, asking him to test Couey using the most recent version of the WAIS.

Carpenter performed the assessment Feb. 8. Couey scored a 64. The trial started Feb. 12.

-- Elena Lesley

Defense rests

After showing jurors a pre-recorded statement from John Couey's aunt, the defense has rested its preliminary case. Proceedings will continue at 9am tomorrow.

A dysfunctional past

Young John Couey suffered from neglect and exposure to inappropriate sexuality, psychologist Robert Berland testified.

Relatives told him that Couey's mother was intellectually limited, "childlike," and that she had to be given simple instructions in parenting. Rather than supporting her newborn's head, she would let it flop around until corrected. She also insisted on feeding Couey sugar water instead of milk because "he liked sugar water," Berland reported her telling relatives.

When Couey was around six, family members discovered blood in his underwear. Apparently he had not been circumcised and had developed an infection.

Though Berland said it was hard to get relatives to open up about inappropriate sexual matters, several did tell him that Couey had been molested. The psychologist also heard that a family member used to take Couey and his sister into the woods for a walk.

He would send Couey away and then have sex with his sister.

Couey said he always felt guilty about "not being able to protect her."

-- Elena Lesley

Brain damage

A number of incidents, reported by family and John Couey himself, suggest that the defendant could have suffered brain damage.

Even before he was born, Couey was at risk. His young mother was forced out of a moving vehicle around seven months into her pregnancy. Shortly after, she went into labor.

As a child, Couey suffered multiple incidents of abuse. His stepfather was infuriated by Couey's persistent bed-wetting, tying him to the bed and slamming his head in a door jam repeatedly. When he grew older, Couey did significant damage to his own mind through huffing, popping amphetamines and using other illicit substances.

"There is clear evidence of significant brain injury," Berland said.

-- Elena Lesley

Psychosis

Coueydrawing Psychologist Robert Berland took the stand again, this time to describe, in detail, John Couey's alleged psychosis.

(Pool photo: Couey continues to etch drawings in the courtroom. Click on photo to enlarge.)

Personality tests, one conducted over ten years ago and the other given to Couey after Jessica Lunsford's death, showed the defendant trying to conceal his mental illness, Berland said. But results indicated he was chronically psychologically disturbed, or had "gotten used to being crazy," as Berland described it.

Despite his attempts to hide his mental illness, Couey did admit some hallucinations to Berland. He told the psychologist he heard voices and thought that an evil spirit had been giving him instructions since he was in his early teens.

Berland classified his psychological disturbance as mild to moderate. He's not standing on the street corner, "with long scraggly hair, talking to the sky." He can put gas in a car, pay the rent.

But that doesn't mean Couey doesn't hear noises that aren't there, or think that people are plotting against him, Berland said. Relatives reported that, from a young age, they saw Couey mumbling to himself.

Berland said that Couey also suffered from manic episodes, during which he would sometimes go days only sleeping a couple hours a night. He told the psychologist these had worsened in the months leading up to Jessica's disappearance.

-- Elena Lesley

Science has its limitations

In his cross-examination of Dr. Joseph Wu, Prosecutor Ric Ridgway asked what kind of diagnosis a doctor could make from a PET scan alone. In a vacuum. With no corroborating evidence.

Not much, Wu admitted.

Ridgway then asked where Wu had received the outside information he used, along with Couey's raw scans, to make a determination. Wu said the information had come from Robert Berland and Richard Carpenter, both also witnesses for the defense. He had received Carpenter's information only this morning.

Ridgway asked Wu whether he had testified for the defense or prosecution before in death penalty trials. The defense, Wu said.

He ended his questioning by asking whether every person with Couey's brain scan abnormality would kidnap, rape and murder a young girl. The answer was no.

-- Elena Lesley

Inside Couey's brain

Making a case for John Couey's "bad brain," Dr. Joseph Wu of the University of California at Irvine, showed scans of the defendant's brain function to jurors, contrasting it with images from a normal adult.

PET scans can be combined with other sources of information to make a clinical diagnosis.

Wu said he noted an asymmetry in the function of Couey's brain, which could be consistent with psychosis, mood disregulation and low IQ scores.

The temporal lobe, where Wu noted the significant asymmetry, can affect impulse control. Abnormalities of this kind are often associated with aggression and hypersexuality.

Inherent flaws in brain structure, combined with a bad rearing environment, can lead to a "catastrophic ability to regulate impulses," he said.

-- Elena Lesley

Break

Judge Ric Howard has called an early lunch break. Court will reconvene at 1pm.

A young offender

Linda "Susie" Arnett, John Couey's cousin, told jurors that she woke up to find Couey on top of her when he was around 10 years old. He was trying to take off her underwear.

Arnett told her mom what had happened, and Couey was sent to live with other relatives.

Though she was startled at the time, Arnett said she was never afraid of Couey.

Even as he got older "he reminded me of a little puppy," Arnett said. "He was still a child. Mentally, he was still a child."

-- Elena Lesley

"He just didn't fit in"

Blogcoueyboy

Making a case for John Couey's limited mental capabilities, the defense called witnesses who knew Couey as a child, as well as experts who could testify to his deficiencies.

Couey's uncle, whose testimony was pre-recorded, said Couey was a shy child and suffered from an ear deformity.

Linda "Susie" Arnett, Couey's first cousin, described Couey as "small in stature" with "floppy ears" when he came to live with her family. He couldn't speak clearly and Arnett and her mother spent hours trying to teach him verbal skills.

Even after Arnett's mother had Couey's ears fixed surgically, "he just didn't fit in," Arnett said.

Couey and his sister were both in special education courses because of learning disabilities.

Dr. Richard Carpenter testified that a recent test put Couey's IQ at 64. A score of 70 is generally considered the cutoff for mental retardation by the American Psychiatric Association.

-- Elena Lesley

About This Blog

Follow the latest developments in the murder trial of John Couey as compiled and reported by the staff of the St. Petersburg Times and tampabay.com.

Subscribe to this Blog

Advertisement


From the St. Petersburg Times