Another helping at The Table
Last week when the Times unveiled the new Taste section, with its new rating system for reviews, I braced for impact. I figured at least a few restaurateurs would take issue with food, ambiance and service being summarized briskly with stars. So far, it's been radio silence. Today this week's review of The Table went up on the website, garnering an impressive three stars.
Despite the high rating, there are still things about The Table that got me thinking about trends I've seen recently that concern me. The Table calls its cuisine "Atlantic Rim." Before visiting, I looked at a globe to get a sense for what this might mean. Geez, that could be the food of Mauritania, Greenland, Brazil or Cape Cod. The restaurant's own definition reflects a hazy sense of geography or a liberal sensibility: foods of South America, the Caribbean, the eastern U.S. and a hint of Spain. Ingredients from Peru (not on the Atlantic) and lots of manchego and Serrano ham (Spain: no Atlantic) confuse the issue. I think a more helpful description would be foods of South America, refracted through the prism of 21st century Floridian tastes.
Increasingly, new restaurants adopt a globe-trotting approach that could only be summarized as "eclectic." That in itself is probably only frustrating for food writers who have to describe what's going on, but when it means importing exotic ingredients from the far-flung corners of the planet, those oh-so-21st-century words "carbon footprint" begin to creep into my consciousness. Importing a tuber from Peru is justified if said root kicks the butt of any spud from Idaho; a rare Brazilian pepper worth the sweat of a long distribution chain if it elevates a dish to some hitherto unknown height. Otherwise, let's shop closer to home and work to broaden and improve the range of options in our backyard.


Recent Comments