Supreme arguments, part 2

One of the more entertaining takes on yesterday's global-warming arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court is available today on the Slate website, written by its legal correspondent Dahlia Lithwick. This is the first paragraph:

"If there is anything stranger than writing up your story on global warming in a T-shirt … in late November … in the District of Columbia, I can't quite think what it is. In fact nothing about this morning's oral argument, in Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency, is normal. The justices are perhaps deciding, after all, the most urgent scientific question facing the planet: They are deciding Bush v. Gore's Movie."

To read the full piece, click on:

http://www.slate.com/id/2154622

--Craig Pittman