Fueling Station
Tampabay.com

Comment Policy

    Please be sure your comments are appropriate before submitting them. Inappropriate comments include content that:
  • Is libelous
  • Is abusive, harassing, or threatening
  • Is obscene, vulgar, or profane
  • Is racially, ethnically or religiously offensive
  • Is illegal or encourages criminal acts
  • Is known to be inaccurate or contains a false attribution
  • Infringes copyrights, trademarks, publicity or any other rights of others
  • Impersonates anyone (actual or fictitious)
  • Solicits funds, goods or services, or advertises
  • The St. Petersburg Times does not edit posts but reserves the right to delete comments that violate our policy.

« December 2006 | Main | February 2007 »

January 31, 2007

Global warming. Scientists say we can reduce it.

The reports on global warming are coming thick and fast.
While some are looking at trying to better understand global climate change to calculate how imminent a danger we face, others are already looking forward at what we can do about it.

Border The American Solar Energy Society (ASES) says it has an answer: Deploy clean energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies now!

This morning in Washington D.C. ASES unveiled a 200-page report, 'Tackling Climate Change in the U.S.: Potential Carbon Emissions Reductions from Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by 2030.'

According to a press release, the report illustrates how energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies can provide the emissions reductions required to address global warming.

The report is backed by National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) climate scientist James Hansen, Sierra Club Executive Director Carl Pope, and several members of Congress.

According to Hansen, “We must begin fundamental changes in our energy use now in order to avoid human-made climate disasters.

Energysolutions The report examines the potential role of several energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies in reducing carbon dioxide emissions, including energy efficiency in buildings, transportation, and industry, as well as concentrating solar power, photovoltaics, wind power, biomass, biofuels, and geothermal power. (click on graphic to enlarge. It show that the biggest reduction can come from energy efficiency (EE), followed by wind, biofuels, biomass and solar.)

Asesenergymap The results indicate that these technologies can displace approximately 1.2 billion tons of carbon emissions annually by the year 2030, the report finds. This is equal to the magnituide of reduction that scientists believe is necessary to prevent the most dangerous consequences of climate change. (click on the second graphic to enlarge. It shows which energy technologies are suitable for different parts of the country. e.g. Florida is mostly biomass and solar, but not wind or geothermal.)

Click here to read or download the report, including some high quality graphics.

- David Adams

Biofuels can destroy the environment if not farmed properly.

Showimagefromdbaspx Beware the origin of your biofuels, especially if your biodiesel comes from the South-East Asia.
Environmental practices of palm oil farmers in Indonesia and Malaysia have been under scrutiny for some time. Wednesday's New York Times has a good article looking at some of those concerns, including the effects of peat drainage to clear farming land.

Click here to read the article.
Logo

Click here for a recent report by Wetlands International on carbon emissions due to palm farming on peatlands.

- David Adams

January 30, 2007

Back from the dead, Castro joins the debate on global warming.

Castro_and_chavezFidel is back. And guess what he's talking about. Global warming no less!

As 'proof of life' Castro is seen reading the headline of an article about the effects of climate change on global health, published Saturday in the Argentine daily Clarin.

Portadachica I've checked Clarin's website and it does indeed have a long article about a World Health Organization report on how global warming could contribute to the increased incidence of diseases such as malaria, dengue fever, and yellow fever.

In the video, Castro's visitor, Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez, highlights energy issues as the main topic of their two hour meeting Monday afternoon. The video would appear to confirm Cuban government statements that Castro is finally recovering from stomach surgery last July, despite medical complications.

Before he got sick Castro had been talking about energy issues. He declared 2006 as the Year of the Energy Revolution and announced a series of energy conservation projects, including distributing free energy-saving fluorescent light bulbs and importing energy-efficient fridges, TVs and air-conditioners from China.

Click here to see the Castro video.

Click here to read the Clarin article. (The paper also ran an op-ed that day, which Castro would surely have enjoyed, comparing Bush's enery policies to dancing on the deck of an 'ecological Titanic.')

Global warming. Was there a Bush administration cover-up?

The allegations has been around for a long time. That the Bush administration tried to hide the evidence on global warming.

But while Republicans ran Congress it wasn't something the ruling party would hold hearings on. Now with the Democrats in control, that is all changing.

Globalstory In a hearing on Capitol Hill Tuesday, a congressional committee heard evidence from government climate scientists and two private advocacy groups that political pressure was used at federal agencies to downplay the threat of global warming. Democrats say the White House  refuses to disclose incriminating documents.

  "It appears there may have been an orchestrated campaign to mislead the public about climate change," said Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif. Waxman is chairman of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee. 

"We know that the White House possesses documents that contain evidence of an attempt by senior administration officials to mislead the public by injecting doubt into the science of global warming and minimize the potential danger," he added.

At the same time, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Cal)., held an open meeting for her colleagues in the Senate to express their views on climate change, in advance of a broader set of hearings on the issue. Among the speakers were presidential hopefuls John McCain, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. "I think this is the moment that we will take a stand," said Boxer.

Since Democrats took control of Congress this month, there has been a rush to introduce climate legislation (see list below with link to a handy chart on all Senate proposals).

The Union of Concerned Scientists and the Government Accountability Project, presented the House oversight committee with a report containing "new evidence of suppression and manipulation of climate science."

The groups presented a survey that shows two in five of the 279 climate scientists who responded to a questionnaire complained that some of their scientific papers had been edited in a way that changed their meaning. Nearly half of the 279 said in response to another question that at some point they had been told to delete reference to "global warming" or "climate change" from a report.

The groups said their findings covered seven federal agencies and includes firsthand experiences by government climate scientists and workers.

Among them, an official of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and a former senior official of the office that coordinates the government's climate programs. That former official, Rick Piltz, quit his job in 2005, charging that scientists' climate documents were being edited by political appointees to tone them down.

James Hansen, director of the Goddard Institute for Space Studies, who is one of the country's top experts on climate change, has also accused NASA of trying to keep him from speaking publicly about global warming.

Here's a list of proposed Congressional legislation on climate change:

- Barbara Boxer: (D-Cal) a bill to drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 80 percent by mid-century.

- Barack Obama (D-Ill) and John McCain (R-Ari): co-sponsors of a bill along with Sen. Joe Lieberman, (I-Conn.), that would cut emissions by two-thirds by 2050.

- Sen. Jeff Bingaman, (D-N.M.): would gradually halt the growth of carbon emissions by 2030 and then is expected to lead to reductions.

All three would require mandatory caps on greenhouse gas releases from power plants, cars and other sources. They also would have various forms of an emissions trading system to reduce the economic cost.

Click here to read previous post Monday on allegations of political massaging of climate data.

Click here for today's coverage on NPR.

Click here for more AP coverage with video.

Click here for link to legislative chart prepared by the Pew Center for Global Climate Change

- David Adams

January 29, 2007

Silicon Valley's clean tech push.

President Bush needs help to meet his energy proposals in last week's State of the Union speech. And look who is riding to the rescue: Silicon Valley.

The New York Times has an interesting article today describing how venture capitalists are pushing the debate over alternative energy.

Silicon Valley wants the government to do more - such as setting mandates or incentives to get biofuel pumps installed at gas stations and to force auto manufacturers to make more flex-fuel (or 'ethanol ready'), diesel and hybrid vehicles.

“You have to create a playing field to make it possible for us to back these companies,” says Nicholas Parker, chairman of the Cleantech Group, a research and trade organization representing venture investors in alternative energy.

That's because the oil and gas lobby is still far more influential. Lobbyists for oil and gas companies spent $59 million in 2005, compared with the $2 million spent by venture capitalists, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonprofit Washington group.

But the venture capitalists are upping the anti, the New York Times says. In 2006, venture capitalists put $727 million into 39 alternative energy start-ups, compared with $195 million in 18 such firms for 2005, according to the National Venture Capital Association. More than a third of the 2006 investments went to technologies related to ethanol.

Khosla600_1 To bring about the change, venture capitalists have begun forming committees and lobbying groups. Kleiner Perkins has formed the Greentech Innovation Network to bring together entrepreneurs, scientists, academics and policy makers.

“There is zero question in my mind we can replace all the petroleum used in cars,” says Vinod Khosla,(see photo) a founder of Sun Microsystems and a major biofuels advocate.

Click here to read the New York Times article, 'Tech Barons Take on New Project: Energy Policy.'

- David Adams

Political interference on global warming?

                   
 

     New charges of political interference in reports on the science of global warming are to be aired Tuesday at a hearing of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

                         

     The hearing is part of a continuing investigation into alleged censoring of government climate reports by political appointees.

     Testifying will be the Union of Concerned Scientists and the Government Accountability Project, a nonprofit legal-assistance group for government whistleblowers.                          

     The two groups are to release a report "that has uncovered new evidence of suppression and manipulation of climate science in seven federal agencies," the UCS said Friday.

      It said senior scientists and advisers are to testify about their firsthand experiences documented in the report. The report includes a survey "and 40 in-depth interviews," said UCS spokeswoman Emily Robinson.                          

     Last summer, documents obtained by the Government Accountability Project led to press reports and launch of a committee investigation into actions by the chief of staff of the White House Council on Environmental Quality.

Click here to visit Green Sheets.(CQ Green Sheets offers unique insight into the environmental and energy policy terrain.)

Click here for AP coverage.

- David Adams

Energy highlights from Davos.

Clinton_1 - Clinton weighs in on climate change:

Climate change is former US president Bill Clinton's gravest worry for the world today. It is the only problem "that has the power to end the march of civilization as we know it", he said, adding that there should be a "serious global effort" to promote clean energy.

Click here for webcast.

- McCain and Blair sopund notes of optimism:

Mccain_image US senator and possible presidential candidate John McCain told the closing session of the World Economic Forum that he expects the US congress to take action on climate change very soon, and the Bush administration to follow suit. "I admit that it is very late, and it may not be enough," McCain said, "but I think that for the first time you are going to see some action on this compelling issue.
Tony_blair_image

Speaking about climate change, Blair said "the mood in America is in the process of a quantum shift."

Click here for Blair's speech.

- No impending energy crisis, say energy chiefs:

Leading energy chiefs have assured that there are adequate world energy supplies, and that the market and governing energy institutions are able to absorb energy shocks.

“There is no reason for pessimism,” declared Jeroen van der Veer, Chief Executive of Royal Dutch Shell, at a press conference devoted to energy security, during the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting taking place in Davos. “Easy oil may have peaked,” he said, but high oil prices are providing the public and private sectors with the incentive to invest in discovering alternative sources of energy which are in plentiful supply. A further step will be to find ways to cut the CO2 footprint, added van der Veer.

Diversification will alleviate pressures on world supplies, agreed Fatih Birol, Chief Economist and Head of the Economic Analysis Division at the International Energy Agency. Governments and companies will have to diversify away from oil and gas, as well as away from traditional suppliers to find new markets.

We have the mechanisms, machinery and institutions that can respond” to oil shocks, said Daniel Yergin, Chairman of Cambridge Energy Research Associates, USA. He does not foresee an oil shock unless there is a “massive recession”.

Click here for press release

- David Adams

Rising seas because of climate change. But how high?

The climate debate is hotting up this week in advance of the announcement in Paris on Friday of the latest report by international scientists on the United Nations' IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change).

Globalwarming There is a big debate this year about projections for sea level rise due to ice-sheet melt. Conservative forecasts put the rise as low as 5 inches by the end of the century. Others say this does not factor in dramatic recent events such as the sudden loss of the 1,255-square-mile Larsen B ice shelf which took only 35 days to disintegrate and vanish.

The World Glacier Monitoring Service, which continuously studies a sample of 30 glaciers around the world, says mountain glaciers are shrinking three times faster than in the 1980s. The acceleration is down to climate change, the scientists say.

Click here for an AP report and another AP dispatch on scientists slamming the report as too rosy..

Click here for report on NPR.

Click here for a BBC report.

January 28, 2007

Oil prices on the MEND?

Mend Optimists like to think that oil prices are gradually returning to an acceptable level. To be sure $55 a barrel is a lot better than $78 a barrel, which is where prices were last summer.

But that doesn't mean that the future price of oil is assured. Far from it. With supply so tight, a political crisis in any part of the world could send prices spiralling again.

One part of the world that doesn't get much public attention is Nigeria. But we may be hearing a lot more about it in the future.

Poar02_junger0702 According to 'Blood Oil,' a fascinating article in this month's issue of Vanity Fair magazine, a crisis in Nigeria — America's fifth-largest oil supplier— could well be the next great price triggering event. The article is appropriatly written by acclaimed journalist Sebastian Junger, author of The Perfect Storm.

What he describes in the article is a perfect storm of another kind.
Head_shockwavedavos Junger cites a recent simulation by experts called the Oil ShockWave which forecast that oil could hit $120 a barrel if terrorists made simultaneous attacks on oil industry infrastructure around the world.
A group of anti-government rebels, known as the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND) have stepped up their attacks on multi-national oil company installations in Nigeria, including kidnapping foreign oil workers.

They are protesting the environmental devastation caused by the oil industry, as well as the appalling conditions in which most delta inhabitants live. MEND's demands $1.5 billion in restitution for damage to the delicate delta environment, a 50 percent claim on all oil pumped out of the creeks, and development aid to the desperately poor villages of the delta.

Junger writes:

Because Nigerian oil is so vital to the American economy, President Bush's State Department declared in 2002 that—along with all other African oil imports—it was to be considered a "strategic national interest." That essentially meant that the president could send in the U.S. military to protect our access to it.

Click here
to read the Vanity Fair article.

Click here for ABC's Jan 9  Nightline special 'Oil for Terror.'

- David Adams

January 27, 2007

The Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Is there a better way to spend our energy money?

Spr2 "One of the stranger and so far unexplained items in President Bush’s energy program is his proposal to double the capacity of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, to 1.5 billion barrels," the New York Times writes today.

I've been asking myself the same thing since the president made the announcement in his State of the Union speech on Tuesday.

The proposal will cost $65 billion over the next two decades. "But is there nothing better to do with the money?" asks the Times.

Such as investing it in research and development for biofuels, maybe. The NYT points out the following math:

The Bush administration proposes spending $2.7 billion each year for the next 20 years on the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. That is three times the amount that Congress authorized last year for the Energy Department’s entire research and development program for alternative energy sources.

Click here to read the NYT editorial.

- David Adams

Meet the biodiesel dudes: Seth and Tyler.

Biodiesel_duo Seth Warren and Tyler Bradt are a pair of adventurous kayaking dudes on a mission to drive 16,000 miles from Alaska to Tierra del Fuego on biodiesel.

And looks like they might just do it. After starting out in July, they are heading south on a veggie oil burning truck and have already reached Peru.

Click here to find out more about their 'Oil and Water' project.

Click here to read their story in the Miami Herald.

- David Adams

January 26, 2007

Bush more plugged-in after all.

Here's one of those sleeper stories that most people didn't pick up on. I only saw it thanks to a tip from Sherry Boschert, the author and advocate of plug-in hybrids. I'm grateful to the Green Car Congress as well for explaining it to me.

The morning after his State of the Union Address, President Bush issued an executive order to Federal Agencies that requires their fleets to use plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) (see my previous post) when the plug-ins are commercially available at a cost reasonably comparable, on the basis of life-cycle cost, to regular automobiles.

Now why didn't he mention that in the State of the Union? Plug-in enthusiasts were initially disappointed by his speech. Had they known this they might have reacted differently. You sometimes wonder about these brilliant media minds in the White House!!

Here's what the president said:

"Today I signed an executive order that says we’re going to commit the government to the following things: that we’re going to purchase more hybrid and flexible-fuel vehicles that run on ethanol—because we own a lot of cars, and therefore, it’s one thing to say, this is the goal; it’s another thing to actually participate in achieving that goal, and that’s what we’re going to do.

Secondly, we're going to purchase plug-in hybrid vehicles as soon as they hit the market. I think that will give some surety to those who have invested in new technologies to know that the federal government is going to be a purchaser, when commercially available."

—President Bush, speaking at DuPont 24 Jan 07Click here for more from the Green Car Congress

- Click here for more from the Green Car Congress

- David Adams

What will Florida look like in 50 years with global warming? Time to start preparing says new commission.

A new commission studying the state's future has delivered its first report to Gov. Charlie Crist and the Legislature, and it's not lacking in ambition.

The Century Commission for a Sustainable Florida says the state needs to figure out how to deal with global warming, work toward weaning the state off foreign oil, research the state's long-term water supply and map out what environmentally sensitive land deserves to be preserved from development.

"I think we hit a couple of big issues," said the commission's executive director, Steve Seibert, a former Pinellas County commissioner who was secretary of the Department of Community Affairs.

Click here to read Craig's report in the St Petersburg Times

- David Adams

Is the energy revolution possible without coal and nuclear?

Energyrevolutionuse2 A new report says renewable energy in the U.S. can solve global warming without resorting to nuclear power or so-called 'clean coal.'

The report 'Energy Revolution: A Blueprint for Solving Global Warming,' is being released by a group of energy and climate change advocates, including ' Greenpeace USA, and the European Renewable Energy Council (EREC).

The report claims that nearly 80% of U.S. electricity can be produced by renewable energy sources while reducing carbon dioxide emissions by 72%. At the same time America's oil use can be cut by more than 50% by 2050 by using much more efficient cars and trucks (potentially plug-in hybrids), increased use of biofuels and a greater reliance on electricity for transportation.

The 92-page report, commissioned by the German Aerospace Center, used input on all technologies of the renewable energy industry, including wind turbines, solar photovoltaic panels, biomass power plants, solar thermal collectors, and biofuels, all of which "are rapidly becoming mainstream."

Click here
for a full report from Renewable Energy Access.

Global warming - media notes.

Here's a couple more useful takes on the president's energy policy, as pronounced in his state of the union speech Tuesday:

Philadelphia Inquirer columnist Trudy Rubin has a good overview of the debate on global warming, Rubin titled 'Get Real on Global Warming.'

While recognizing a White House "thaw" on the issue, she notes;

"How sad that so many years and so much U.S. prestige have been squandered by the White House's failure to deal constructively with climate change."

In his New York Times column, Thomas Friedman, sees some positive signs for alternative energy in the speech but warns "the devil will be in the details."
Friedmants190_2
Here's an excerpt:

"On energy — no, the president’s proposals were not just beanbag. His call to reform CAFE mileage standards for U.S. cars “shifts the debate from whether to compel U.S. automakers to build more fuel-efficient vehicles to how much they should do so,” notes a strategy consultant, Peter Schwartz. And his call for a nearly fivefold mandatory increase in the production of ethanol and other alternative fuels for cars and trucks also changes the debate from whether to how much, and which fuels."

"But the devil will be in the details. Will liquefied coal be one of those alternatives — which could add to global warming — or only non-fossil-fuel alternatives? On mileage standards, U.S. automakers will lobby the White House very hard for the smallest possible change. Will they get their way? If so, there isn’t much here."

"The really bold, transformative — and popular — initiative Mr. Bush should have offered would either be a national cap-and-trade system for controlling CO2 emissions by utilities, manufacturers and autos, or a carbon tax. Both would create economic incentives for us to get rid of appliances, buildings and cars that emit a lot of CO2 and to invent and purchase those that don’t."

And, click here for a summary of reactions to the speech by renewable energy advocates compiled by Margaret Gurney at the excellent online bulletin Renewable Energy Access.

- David Adams

January 25, 2007

Ford. What a car wreck! Time to go back to its roots: ethanol.

Ford203getty Oh dear! Ford has reported a loss of $12.7bn (£6.5bn) for 2006 - the biggest annual loss in the US carmaker's storied 103-year history.

Struggling in the face of competition from Japanese rivals such as Toyota, Ford plans to stop the bleeding by closing 16 factories and cut 45,000 jobs. But what it really needs to do is build better, fuel-efficient cars!

Ford's big problem is that it has put too much weight on sales of its F-series pick-up trucks and SUVs to generate profits. Ford ignored a trend - higher oil prices and global climate change - that others saw coming a while ago. Current oil prices have customers looking for smaller, more economical vehicles. If oil-enamored George Bush gets it, surely the folks at Ford have no excuse.

Last year Bill Ford, stepped down as head of the car manufacturer founded by his great Model_t_1 grandfather. The Ford family still owns a 40 percent voting stake in the company. The company's founder, Henry Ford, built his first commercial car in 1908, the Model T, to run on ethanol.

At the time I wrote that the company might do well to go back to its renewable fuel roots and invest more heavily in flex-fuel technology.
I asked why Ford hadn't pushed the company's flex-fuel and hybrid models faster (see Ford's website: 'Making a Greener Today') as well as its smaller, fuel-efficient models. For years the company has argued that there wasn't enough consumer interest in those lines. Hmmmmmm. Look what its concentration on SUVs and pick ups achieved!

   

In a recent interview Newsweek asked Ford why the company was blindsided by the oil markets?
This was his reply:
"We did see this coming. But we didn't anticipate the severity and the speed at which oil rose. We did plan our future products with the notion that oil was going to be a dearer resource and a more expensive one over time. And therefore the shift is already underway to make our product line more fuel-efficient and, in many ways, smaller."

For the full interview click here.

Click here for the New York Times' interview with Ford's new boss, Alan Mulally. Guess what, he's now preaching small cars!

January 24, 2007

Bush's 'Twenty in Ten' energy plan. How green did he go?

Whitehousewith_cornWhitehousewith_corn_1 Whitehousewith_corn_2 Whitehousewith_corn_3

Take a closer look at this photo. I love it! It's from a New York Times article earlier this week on ethanol. And it serves as a perfect introduction to today's hot topic: has the president gone green?

In his State of the Union speech president Bush said he wants to reduce gasoline usage by 20 percent over the next decade. But, if he is really serious about reaching that 'Twenty in Ten' goal it's going to be a tough hill to climb - and a very green one at that.

Bush’s plan rests largely on raising alternative biofuel production - principally ethanol and biodiesel - to 35 Bush_and_dupont billion gallons by 2017. That's almost five times more than the current target of 7.5 billion gallons by 2012. (see photo of Bush's visit Wednesday to DuPont's biofuel research facility in Wilmington, Delaware. Click here for report on his visit.)

The president also called for greater use of wind and solar energy, expanded use of clean diesel vehicles, and accelerated research into the batteries needed for ‘plug-in hybrid’ vehicles. But he offered few specifics, and also made no mention of increasingly popular ‘green building’ practices which experts argue can save large amounts of energy. Not did he mention another of my favorites,  creating energy by gasifying municipal waste to biogas (or 'syngas').

Instead, biofuels appears to loom much bigger on his horizon.

While ethanol production from corn has been growing like gangbusters of late in the Mid-West, we can’t rely on corn to meet this giant leap in production, producers warn. In fact, corn won’t get us beyond 15 billion gallons.

Part of the shortfall could be made up by foreign imports, according to Bush. This is an idea which appears to feed off an ethanol import strategy advocated by former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush. (see my Dec 18 post on Jeb's advocacy of a hemispheric trade in ethanol to boost US relations with its neighbors while also relieving dependence on foreign oil.)

Jeb2_and_indycar_1 When I asked Jeb Bush that question last night by email he messaged me back a straightforward answer: "It creates the opportunity we needed," he wrote.

But, imports aside, the president - and his brother, by the way - are both counting on a dramatic increase in domestic ethanol production. That’s why, for the second year running, Bush threw out the words, ‘cellulosic ethanol,’ in his speech. To most people that may sound like scientific gobbledygook, but to biofuels experts it’s the Holy Grail.

I nearly fell off my chair when the president mentioned it last year. Many of us tracking the biofuels debate had no idea that the idea of cellulosic ethanol had risen all the way to the Oval Office. The president even did a good job of pronouncing it!

So, now he's said it twice. Clearly, Bush is banking on cellulosic ethanol’s still unproven technology as the solution to his biofuels gamble. And, it's not a bad bet.
Cellulosic ethanol technology can extract sugar for the production of ethanol from a wide variety of plant fibers using enzymes or bacteria. This enormously increases the diversity of available feedstock for making ethanol, and could be bonanza for Florida which does not grow corn but could produce other suitable feedstock, such as switchgrass or sorghum, as well as forest residue.

Cellulosic technology isn't yet ready for commercial use. Biofuels advocates are confident that the industry is close to cracking the code for cellulosic technology, which is currently twice as expensive to produce as ethanol made form corn. In R&D terms, that is getting close to going commercial.
I think we are getting there sooner than many people think,” Matt Hartwig, spokesman for the Renewable Fuels Association in Washington DC., told me today.

"The private sector continues to work furiously, both on their own and in partnership with government," John Mizroch, head of the Dept of Energy's Office of Renewable Energy, said Wednesday. "But there have been no major breakthroughs."

Three major companies, Abengoa Bioenergy, Iogen Corp and Broin Companies, are currently working on pilot programs in Nebraska, Idaho and Illinois. Abengoa recently teamed up with Dyadic, a Florida company specializing in commercial use of enzymes.
I've gotten to know Dyadic's president, Mark Emalfarb, pretty well in recent months (see photo). “It’s a proven Emalfarb_2 concept,” he told me when I called him yesterday. “It’s not about the science anymore, it’s about economics and which enzyme breaks down which plant fiber, and how effectively.
Emalfarb is a registered Republican, but he voted Democrat for Congress this year over energy policy. "I think George Bush is getting the message that ethanol is a solution," he added.

See what Bush told staff at DuPont in Delaware on Wednesday:

The good news is that we’re on the verge of some unbelievable technological breakthroughs... Bushdupontoverall You’re employing the best minds possible to address the problem of economic and national security and environmental issues, because we’re dependent on oil.”

-  “There (are) all kinds of opportunities to make energy to power your automobiles from that which had been discarded as waste in the past.

I have also examined celluslosic ethanol quite a bit. I wrote an article in December 2005 about research into cellulosic ethanol daing back to the 1980s by professor Lonnie Ingram at the University of Florida in Gainesville.
I also noted in another article how it was gaining the interest of venture capitalists such as Vinod Vinod_khosla_web_20_conference_1 Khosla, the former founder of Sun Micro-Systems who has invested heavily in a bunch of ethanol start-ups. (see photo)
If this didn’t make economic sense I would be investing somewhere else,” Khosla, wrote to The Fueling Station the other day, defending his advocacy of ethanol from critics. (see his comment on my Jan 6 post, Food v Fuel corn debate. The other day I also posted a link to Khosla power-point presentation on ethanol, 'Think Outside the barrel.')

Skeptics question whether the president's plan will give cellulosic ethanol the boost it needs. The 2008 budget provides $179 million for the President's Biofuels Initiative, a modest increase of only $29 million over last year.
A White House statement said the upcoming Bush Farm Bill proposal would include more than $1.6 billion of additional new funding over 10 years for energy innovation, including bio-energy research,
energy efficiency grants, as well as $2 billion in loans for cellulosic ethanol
plants.

Ethanol blenders do benefit from a 51 cent per gallon tax credit at the pump. It's due to expire in 2010. Were the president to extend it until 2017, it's estimated that could be worth $17.8 billion.

But federal funding is dwarfed by private sector investment in these new technologies. Oil giant BP recently announced it was investing $500 million to build a biosciences institute.
The new Democrat-controlled Congress could ratchet up federal funding. Last week the House passed legislation creating a $14 billion clean energy fund at the expense of tax incentives for oil companies.

Renewable energy advocates are concerned that Bush is offering far greater resources for increased research into non-renewable energy sources. That includes giving $650 million in tax credits for producers of ‘clean coal’, which environmentalist say is one of the worst offenders in climate altering carbon emissions. That also comes on top of the $1 billion clean coal received last year.
The president also says he proposes doubling the capacity of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (the nation's stockpile of oil for times of scarcity) over the next 20 years. At today’s prices, it would cost $38 billion to double the reserve, which currently holds 691 million barrels.
That’s real money,” said an upset Carol Werner, director of the Environmental and Energy Study Institute in Washington D.C.. “Why aren’t we investing that kind of money on the renewable side?”

Electric car advocates, many of whom also back plug-in hybrids powered by a mix of gasoline and electricity, are disappointed that the president had so little so say in his speech about what they maintain is the cleanest and cheapest fuel technology.
I went this afternoon to a splendid lecture at Florida International University by Sherry Boschert, a San Francisco journalist and author of ‘Plug-In Hybrids. The car that will recharge America.’ (see also The Fueling Station's post on Monday)

086571571801_aa240_sclzzzzzzz_v50066866_ Boschert said she felt Bush’s speech was “nowhere near as forceful as a year ago when he said 'America is addicted to foreign oil.'”  Bush even stomped for plug-ins during several trips around the country, including a speech at the Oak Ridge National Energy Laboratory in Texas, and a visit to a major battery manufacturer, Johnson Controls, in Milwaukee.
What I heard last night was business as usual," Boschert lamented. "The government isn’t doing anything to make car companies do anything different.”
Her lecture explained in masterful detail how the technology already exists to build fuel efficient electric-hybrid cars. “It’s not rocket science, it’s just not the way we have been doing things,” she says.
Copyofx07cc_ch010 She says auto manufacturers say electric cars won't be commercially available before 2009 at the earliest. What a pity the government isn't doing more to accelerate this technology. (photo left, the Chevy Volt)

Bush did refer to plans to reduce fuel consumption by 8.5 billion gallons by 2017 through reform of the CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) requirements. The CAFE requirements have been notoriously exploited in the past by auto manuffacturers to produce large SUVs with greener, 'ethanol-ready' engines. But until biofuels become more widely available those vehicles will continue to guzzle gasoline.
Experts say the government could do a lot more to provide incentives for electric cars, as well as building the infrastructure to allow for better biofuel distribution nationwide. That includes converting gas station storage tanks to handle ethanol which is more corrosive than gasoline. Ethanol and biodiesel are only currently available on a limited basis, with ethanol largely restricted to the Mid-West corn states.

Click here for an excellent story on ethanol, the past and the future, in Tuesday's New York Times.

Click here for story on Bush's DuPont visit in the Delaware News Journal. There is of course some irony in this visit given DuPont's membership of the US Climate Action Partnership, an alliance of top corporate executives with environmental activists, which on Monday called on the White House to take much firmer action on gloabl warming.

- David Adams

Bush addresses 'global climate change.' But what does he plan to do about it?

20070123235109990001 It was certainly good to hear the president refer to 'global climate change' for the first time in his State of the Union speech last night. His talk of reducing gas usage by 20 percent over the next decade, dubbed 'Twenty in Ten,' was also refreshing. But is it enough?
I'll have more detailed analysis of the energy content of the speech later today.
But here's a couple of thoughts to get the ball rolling. The president wants to achieve his '20 in 10' goal in large part by raising biofuel production to 35 billion gallons by 2017. That's a massive seven-fold increase in capacity from the current level of around 5 billion gallons. That's big news for the biofuels industry which has been going gang-busters of late. But it also means that the president is looking far beyond corn as the main feedstock for this giant leap in production. Experts say relying on corn for ethanol will only get us to 12-15 billion gallons.

As Robert Dineen of the Renewable Fuels Association told the New York Times this week: “We are no longer debating whether this makes sense, if this public policy should be pursued," he said. “The discourse now is how much ethanol can we produce, how quickly can we produce it and what is the pathway for greater production of domestic renewables.”

So, the president is banking on cellulosic ethanol as the key to the future. As Robert Dineen of the Renewable Fuels Association told the New York Times this week: “We are no longer debating whether this makes sense, if this public policy should be pursued," he said. “The discourse now is how much ethanol can we produce, how quickly can we produce it and what is the pathway for greater production of domestic renewables.”

Cellulosic ethanol technology can extract sugar for the production of ethanol from a wide variety of plant fibre using enzymes. This enormously increases the diversity of available feedstock. The United States has plenty of it, according to a federal report, known as the 'Billion Ton' study.
But cellulosic technology isn't yet ready for commercial use. It's close. Check out the work being done here in Florida at Jupiter-based Dyadic, and their recent collaboration with Abengoa Bioenergy.

The president's speech could give cellulosic ethanol the boost it needs. His plan includes $2 billion in loans for construciton of cellulosic ethanol plants.

Secondly, look what happened to the price of oil yesterday when the markets learned that the president planned to double the capacity of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR). It shot up $2.48 a barrel, to $55.04, wiping out most of the recent price tumble. There just isn't a lot of spare oil out there and the president's plan means purchasing an extra 691 million barrels. That's beacoup bucks! Like $38 billion!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That kind of dwarfs the president's spending plan for renewables.

Here are some of the key highlights from the White House background notes to the speech:

1./ The President's proposal will increase the scope of the current Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS),  expanding it to an Alternative Fuel Standard (AFS).    

  • The Alternative Fuel Standard will include sources such as corn ethanol, cellulosic ethanol, biodiesel, methanol, butanol, hydrogen, and alternative fuels.


2./ Advances in many fields will play an important role, such as continued improvement in crop yields, optimization of crops and cellulosic materials as fuel feedstock, and cost reduction in the production of cellulosic ethanol and other alternative fuels.

3./ The President expects most of the expanded fuel standard to be met with domestically-produced alternative fuels. However, importing alternative fuels also increases the diversity of fuel sources, which further increases our energy security.

4./
The Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) Is Currently At 691 Million Barrels And, Due To Increased Consumption, This Represents Only 55 Days Of Net Oil Imports. In 1985, the SPR,  with 493 million barrels of oil, represented 118 days of net oil imports.

5./ The 2008 budget provides $179 million for the President's Biofuels Initiative, an increase of $29 million (19 percent) compared to the 2007 budget. The President's Biofuels Initiative aims to accelerate cost reduction and commercial development of cellulosic ethanol, which can be made from abundant biomass materials, including agricultural waste and forest residues, and from dedicated energy crops such as switchgrass.

6./
The President's Farm Bill Proposal Will Include More Than $1.6 Billion Of Additional New Funding Over Ten Years For Energy Innovation, Including Bio-Energy Research, Energy Efficiency Grants, And $2 Billion In Loans For Cellulosic Ethanol Plants.

7./ Advancing  Lower Carbon, Clean Coal Technologies: Awarded nearly $1 billion in tax credits last year, and will award $650 million more this year.

Click here to go to the White House State of the Union Energy Fact Page.

Click here for full text of the speech.

Click here for the response to the speech from the Renewable Fuels Association.

Click here for response to the speech from the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy.

Click here for St Pete Times coverage of the speech.

- David Adams

January 23, 2007

Global warming's new adversaries: Al Gore's 'Climate Messengers'

By DAVID ADAMS, Times Latin America Correspondent

Published January 23, 2007


Climatemessenger_1 TAMPA - To help her presentation on global warming, Roberta Fernandez flashes a map of Florida.

It shows the southern half of the state underwater, including Tampa Bay. "If Greenland melts the sea will rise 20 feet," says Fernandez, who calls herself a Climate Messenger.

There are gasps in the audience of smart, but mostly uninformed staffers at a local mortgage and real estate firm who have given up their lunch hour to hear her message.

Seven months ago she was just like them. But that was before she saw An Inconvenient Truth, former Vice President Al Gore's hit climate change documentary (which was nominated for two Oscars today).

"I was astounded. I knew about global warming, but not in that way," said Fernandez, 48, who lives in Tampa and owns a Montessori school.

An_inconvenient_truthAfter she came home she found the film's Web site and learned that Gore was looking to personally train 1,000 "Climate Change Messengers" to spread the word on global warming. She signed up.

In her application she said that as owner of a school she felt a responsibility to be a model to children. "They were looking for people with passion who weren't afraid of standing up in front of people," she said.

She had considered becoming a volunteer for heart disease or breast cancer. "But I realized after the movie that no other cause mattered if we didn't have an inhabitable place to live."

Robertariver September she attended the first two-day training session for 50 volunteers at a downtown Nashville hotel. Gore led the training which included a visit to the family farm where he grew up outside Nashville (see photo and click to enlarge).

Not satisfied with that, she volunteered to be a mentor for future trainees. She has been back to Nashville twice, including three back-to-back training sessions earlier this month.

Trainees, who must pay their own airfare and hotel, come away from the sessions armed with materials to go forth and spread the gospel on global warming. They also sign a commitment to give 10 presentations of Gore's slide show on climate change, which is the basis for An Inconvenient Truth.

At the sessions Gore patiently goes through his now famous slides, explaining the science behind each one and the sources for the information he uses, as well as taking questions.

Robertasgroup "All the trainees are very surprised how much time he spends with them," Fernandez said. (photo of Al Gore with the first group of 50 trainees at his farm outside Nashville)

The idea for training the messengers was born from interviews Gore gave after An Inconvenient Truth was released in May. Gore found himself being asked repeatedly what he planned to do next. So he formed the Climate Project and tasked it with building a curriculum and Web site to attract trainees.

"It all happened very fast," said the Climate Project's director, Jenny Clad, a lawyer who is married to Gore's longtime friend and chief of staff, Roy Neel. "There was no model for this. It was all invented as we went along."

Rather than seek publicity the organizers decided to fly under the radar, fearing that if word got out too widely they might be inundated with applications. Even without publicity they were overwhelmed by requests.

"We didn't want to have to turn all those people down," said Clad.

In picking the successful applicants, organizers tried to select as broad a range of people and professions as possible, covering all 50 states, with a handful also from Canada, Mexico, Europe and Africa.

The trainees are a diverse bunch, varying in age from a woman in her 90s to a 14-year-old boy. They include judges, scientists, politicians and teachers, as well as Hollywood actor Cameron Diaz. Several other celebrities, including Leonardo DiCaprio and Laura Dern, were unable to make the sessions due to other commitments.

So far, about 850 messengers have been trained in the United States and another 85 in Australia. More sessions are planned in Nashville in late spring. Gore also plans to do training in the United Kingdom and Australia, and maybe India and China, too.

The success of the project may have answered Gore's personal frustration - one he expresses in the film - over his failure as a politician to get the message about climate change across to the public. An Inconvenient Truth has become the world's third best-grossing documentary, after Fahrenheit 9/11 and March of the Penguins, and is a likely Oscar candidate.

"We have failed to mobilize an organized response in this country to global warming," says Stephen Smith, executive director of the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, who took the course in January. "This is one of the motivating factors for him."

Gore tells his trainees they are the "cavalry" who must take the battle forward from now on. Since the training began, the messengers have already surpassed Gore's personal tally of presentations, which runs into the thousands.

"That's what most tickles him pink," said Clad. "It's a grass roots organization, and it's sort of become a movement."

The message is certainly spreading. Fernandez has already exceeded her quota of presentations, conducting 18 in the Tampa Bay area, including local school students, as well as Hillsborough county science teachers.

More than 30 staffers at the Tampa offices of the Loan Corp., Florida's largest mortgage broker, packed the firm's conference room Friday for her 40-minute talk.

They listened intently as she flashed up Gore's slides with grim images of melting glaciers and graphs of population growth and rising energy demand.

After it was over Harry Hedaya, the company president thanked her for opening their eyes to a problem which could seriously affect the property and livelihoods of millions of Floridians. "I have always thought of it as a political process," he said. "Now I realize it's much more of an educational process."

(see photo at top of story by Melissa Lyttle, St Petersburg Times staff)

He highlighted the slide which showed most of the southern half of Florida under water. Hedaya noted that anyone in real estate business should be taking this very seriously. "I think about the insurance industry," he said. "They are not idiots. They can predict when you are going to die."

Fernandez likes to end on a positive note. "It's not true that global warming is not fixable," she said, reeling off a list of "convenient" things everyone can do to be more energy efficient.

Her message seems to hit home. "I was clueless, it was very informative," said Maria Valeri, 40, who works in accounting.

"No wonder the rest of the world hates us!" added loan officer Matt Moskos, 28, referring to the United States' disproportionate 30 percent share of the world's greenhouse gas emissions.

Fernandez says that while the messengers may lack Gore's star power, the concept works well.

"Some people don't like Mr. Gore," she says. "A presentation is more personal. People want to ask questions. They want to know why you are doing it."

Fernandez has no doubts about her reasons. "So many people I talk to don't think it's going to happen in our lifetime. They need to hear it."

- David Adams

Click here to read the latest report about glaciers melting in Europe's Alps. Scientists say they will have disappeared by 2050 if we don't reduce our greenhouse gas emissions!

Fast Facts:

More information

Find out about the Climate Project at www.the climateproject.org 
To obtain a copy of her book or request a global warming presentation, contact Roberta at: roberta@environmentaladvocacy.com

Roberta sent us her Top Ten facts about global warming:

#1-  Rank of 2006 as hottest year on record in the continental United States.

#1- Rank of United States as top global warming polluter, emitting almost as much as the European Union, Russia and Japan combined.

20% - Increase of America's carbon dioxide emissions from the burning of fossil fuels since 1990.

15% - Increase of America's carbon dioxide emissions forecast by 2020 if pollution is not capped.

78 - Number of days by which the U.S. fire season has increased over the past 20 years.

200-million - Number of people who could be displaced globally by extreme droughts, sea level rise and flooding by 2080.

0 - Number of federal bills passed by Congress to cap America's global warming pollution.

0 - number of times president Bush has mentioned the words 'global warming' or 'climate change' in his speeches (prior to his State of the Union speech Jan 23 2007).

Roberta also has some tips for 'convenient' ways you can help stop global warming:

1./ Carpool, walk, ride a bike, use mass transit: If every commuter did this 1 day at home, we’d save 5.85 billion gallons of gas and 143 billion tons of CO²

2./ Get better gas mileage: Every 3 miles per gallon improvement can save 3,000 lbs. of CO per year; A hybrid car can reduce CO by 16,000 lbs. and save you $3,750 per year; Rapid acceleration can decrease mileage by 5 to 33%
 
3./ Replace your bulbs with CFL’s: If every house used only 1 CFL, it would be equivalent to removing of 1 million cars from the roads; Lighting accounts for 20% of all electricity consumed in the US
 
4./ Set your thermostat at 78 in the summer and 68 in the winter: Heating/cooling your home accounts for about 45% of a home’s total energy use.
 
5./ Seal your doors and windows, insulate. The average home causes more pollution than our car because of the fossil fuels burned to supply the power we need.
 
6./ Unplug everything you are not using: Standby power can account for 9-10% of household energy. A television uses 25% of its energy when it is turned off.
 
7./ Take shorter showers: aim for 5 minutes; 1883 low flow shower heads will save 472,630 lbs. of CO
 
8./ Stop junk mail: The production of junk mail consumes as much energy as 2.8 million cars. There are 200 million trees cut for junk mail every year – that’s like cutting down the Rocky Mt. National Park 3 times per year
 
9./ Use refillable and reusable containers, recycle: 1.5 million barrels of oil is used for America’s bottled water. This equals fueling 100,000 cars for a year. 8 out of 10 bottles end up in landfills; Worldwide, 500 billion plastic bags are manufactured each year, that is nearly 1 million per minute. Use cloth bags instead
 
10./ Use the power of your voice and your votes: Write your local, state and federal officials to let them know you think this is a critical issue that needs to be addressed with appropriate measures.
 

Source: 'The Little Book of Convenient Things you can do to Stop Global Warming,' by Roberta Fernandez.

What to expect for the State of the Union. More biofuels, but not much more.

From today's St Petersburg Times:

By DAVID ADAMS, Times Latin America Correspondent
Published January 23, 2007


Ethanol_7_1White House aides say President Bush will make a major announcement on America's energy policy in his State of the Union address tonight.

But it's unlikely to satisfy growing public concern over global climate change or rising corporate calls for federal action on carbon dioxide and other "greenhouse gas" emissions, experts say.

Instead of announcing new energy initiatives, Bush is expected to renew the warning he made last year about America's "addiction to foreign oil."

Focusing on the need to address "energy independence," aides say, Bush will call for increased production of domestic biofuels for blending with gasoline and diesel. He is also likely to highlight the need for more research on electric-hybrid vehicles, as well as "clean coal" technology and nuclear energy.

Energy policy thrust itself into the political forefront after America's coastline was battered by severe weather in 2005, followed by a sharp increase in fuel costs.

While the price of oil has dropped back to around $50 a barrel in recent weeks, energy experts, industry executives and even some Republican leaders say the government needs to take more drastic action to prepare the country for a radical crunch over future energy demand and supply.

On the eve of the president's speech, the chief executives of 20 major corporations urged Bush on Monday to support major mandatory reductions in climate-changing pollution.

"We can and must take prompt action to establish a coordinated, economy-wide market-driven approach to climate protection," the executives wrote in a letter to the president. Calling themselves the U.S Climate Action Partnership, the group includes the heads of B.P. America Inc, Dupont Co. and General Electric Co., as well as four power utilities.

"This is hugely significant," said Carol Werner, director of the Environmental and Energy Study Institute in Washington, D.C.. "These are big utilities. That should really send a big signal."

Bush has in the past rejected mandatory controls on carbon dioxide and other "greenhouse gas" emissions, preferring voluntary private sector efforts.

"It must be mandatory," said Jim Rogers, chairman of Duke Energy. "The science of global warming is clear. We know enough to act now. We must act now."

The president's defenders say the Bush administration has done more to promote energy solutions than meets the eye, but has done a poor job explaining it.

"There really has been significant progress," said Jerry Paul, an energy consultant in Tallahassee and former Department of Energy official in the Bush administration. "More resources have been put into renewable energy than any previous president."

But critics say Bush administration funding for alternative energy often comes at the expense of other renewable programs.

Lately, the White House and Republican leaders appear divided over how to address energy policy. The newly elected Republican party chairman, Florida Sen. Mel Martinez, has opposed offshore oil drilling and is also a strong supporter of ethanol, as is former Gov. Jeb Bush.

Story6e52f85f45dfdaca5e1867437f270c64_16_1At his own State of the State speech this month, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger announced a plan to reduce the carbon content in the state's fuel.

"One area where we definitely need the climate to change is the national government's attitude toward global warming," he added.

Alternative energy advocates welcome the likely boost to biofuels. Florida sees itself as a big potential biofuels winner due to its agriculture and climate.

In 2005, Congress set a biofuels production goal, known as the Renewable Fuel Standard, of 7.5-million gallons by 2012. Ethanol and biodiesel producers are expected to meet the target, but experts say support is still required if biofuels are to make significant inroads into gasoline.

Aides says the president will extend the goal to 60-million gallons by 2030.

"That's nice," said Reid Detchon, director of the Energy Future Coalition in Washington. "But if that's all there is then there's nothing there." Information from the Associated Press was used in this report.

[Last modified January 23, 2007, 01:31:55]

January 22, 2007

Plug-In Hybrids. How electric cars could change America.

Our guest contributor James Culp (see this morning's previous post) has sent us this report on last night's Plug-In Hybrid book presentation by the author Sherry Boschert:

James writes:

As The Fueling Station reported on Tuesday, today was the special event at the Florida Solar Energy Phevbookjacket_sm Center in Cocoa, Florida featuring California author, Sherry Boschert and her new book: 'Plug-In Hybrids. The Cars that could Recharge America.'

Sherry did an excellent job of breaking down the history, technology, politics, and future projections involving the Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle or "PHEV." Her book brings to culmination almost thirty years as a journalist. Basically, "this book explains what plug-in hybrids are, why people want them, and what you can do to get one," she says.

Sherry begins with an insider's look at General Motor's EV1 and then carries us all the way to an exciting development called Vehicle to Grid Technology or "V2G." In this latest concept, electric vehicles would be connected directly to the grid and would supplement power supplies during peak demand. This makes sense, because as Sherry discussed, "The average car is driven 3 hours and is parked 21 hours." It is estimated that 1 million V2G's would equal approximately 20 average power plants.  This would bring "flexibility to the grid for the utility and extra income for the driver."

Don't be mistaken, "Plug-In Hybrids,..." is not all about the technology, it is as much about the interesting people from different political backgrounds, who are all making this technology work and evolve to its next level. Sherry admits to having less of an engineering background and more of one involving people, process, and policy; however, her presentation and book are adequately balanced across each of these areas enough to pique the interest of most readers. Take the case of former CIA director, R. James Woolsey, who "is demanding plug-in hybrids to wean us from petroleum." One does not have to study the press too hard to realize that Mr Woolsey sees our dependence on foreign oil as a threat to national security. Another example of people on the front lines happens to be Felix Kramer and his partners, who formed a nonprofit organization that was responsible for creating the first Prius plug-in hybrids.

In a nutshell, the development of plug-in hybrids on a mass scale does not require a major technological breakthrough, but it does require each of us to take a stand. Log onto www.pluginamerica.org and click on "take action now," there you will find the telephone numbers of recorded lines for each of the major auto manufacturers. Then tell your politicians and your neighbors. Realize that you do not have to sit and wait for your plug-in hybrid to come off the assembly line, you can log onto www.eaa-phev.org to learn how to modify an existing car to make one yourself.

Every time I am invited to the FSEC campus, I always feel that I am amongst passionate, intelligent pioneers who are in the trenches of the renewable energy world, battling for solutions to our nation's myriad energy problems. Sunday was no exception. Besides her career as a medical news reporter and now as an author and plug-in hybrid advocate, Sherry is a solid renewable energy practitioner as well. In addition to installing solar panels to the roof of her home, she bought an electric vehicle, and also founded the San Francisco Electric Vehicle Association (www.sfeva.org).

Sherrry_1 Charles Whalen, Director of Public Charging Infrastructure at the Florida Electric Auto Association (www.FloridaEAA.org), recently received a call from Sherry and got the ball rolling in preparation for her book release and presentations throughout Florida. One of our colleagues that Charles contacted was Bill Young, FSEC researcher and Coordinator for the Space Coast Clean Cities Coalition (www.clean-cities.org), an organization created by the US Department of Energy to promote alternative fuel vehicles. Once Bill knew that Sherry would be in town, he arranged for FSEC to host today's event that was open to the public. (see photo of Ch