And is it okay with tequila? Questions basically unanswered in this impenetrable press release that just plopped into the old e-mail slot moments ago from the Salt Institute. Yes, there is one. It goes without saying but I have to say it anyway: What? Read on for an excerpt. And put on your thinking caps.
Headline: Salt Institute challenges Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee
on lack of science and transparency
Alexandria, VA—The Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (DGAC) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Department of Agriculture continues to retreat from public engagement and transparency as it forms guidelines on population-wide salt reduction based on substandard evidence and science, according to the Salt Institute.
“We had hoped that this Administration would provide transparency, public engagement and solid science as it makes decisions that affect millions of Americans. Unfortunately, the Committee’s meeting this week was held as a webinar, excluding public engagement, and was filled with expert opinion as opposed to evidence-based findings,” said Salt Institute President Dick Hanneman.
Previous Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committees made recommendations that were confidently portrayed as evidence-based, yet a short time later were forced to be withdrawn when the published science, as well as the impact of the recommendations, proved the Guidelines to be wrong. Evidence is accumulating about salt much as it did about fat. The Salt Institute proposes that the Committee will need to step back from its historically restrictive guidance on salt just as scientific advance has already required it to do on guidelines for fat.
(And they talk about transparency?)
*

Recent Comments