There's been a huge uproar over this week's findings by a government task force that most women don't need to start getting mammograms until age 50.
We've known for a long time that breast cancer -- the No. 2 cancer killer of American women -- is far more common in women over 50, and that screening tests for younger women aren't as accurate, and could mean a lot more exposure to false positives, radiation and anxiety than is warranted by the actual help the test can provide.
St. Petersburg Times reporter Letitia Stein recently reported on the shortcomings of mammograms as a screening tool, including this stunning statistic: You have to screen 1,000 women to save one life.
But this isn't just a scientific issue -- it's also a hot-button political topic. In fact, as this Washington Post story explains, a different panel of medical experts made the same recommendation years ago, but the subsequent political outcry -- including a unanimous vote by the U.S. Senate -- quickly squashed it.
Many opponents of the new recommendations fear that they are based in a desire to save money, although the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force staunchly denies that cost was a factor in its review of more than 40 scientific studies of mammography. But there's no doubt mammograms are expensive. Sure, we've seen ads for $65 mammograms, but the real cost is significantly higher -- hundreds of dollars. Here's one expert who puts it closer to $1,000, if you count everything, including depreciation on the machines.
So, not surprisingly, a lot of people are saying this is all an effort to help insurance companies save money by not having to cover so many mammograms. This afternoon, U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius stepped up to the microphone to assure us that nothing's changing in that regard.
“The task force has presented some new evidence for consideration but our policies remain unchanged,” she said. “Indeed, I would be very surprised if any private insurance company changed its mammography coverage decisions as a result of this action.”
Members of Congress already are decrying the new recommendations, with some hinting that they're tantamount to healthcare rationing.
What do you think?
Is the U.S. spending too much money on mammograms at the expense of other health priorities? Is every life saved by mammography so invaluable that it's just wrong to worry about the cost? Are American women getting a false sense of security every time they get their annual mammogram?
Let's talk about it.
Charlotte Sutton, health and medicine editor.
AP Photo of Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., center, flanked by Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., left, and Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, to discuss the new mammogram guidelines.
Recent Comments