Horrors! Angelina Jolie is an undecided voter
Here's something we're quite sure you didn't care about: Who Angelina Jolie is going to vote for in the presidential election come November. The answer? Nobody, yet.
"I have not decided on a candidate," the 33-year-old told Variety. "I am waiting to see the commitments they will make on issues like international justice, refugees and how to address the needs of children in crisis around the world."
Around the world? We'd think the next president should be busy addressing the children in crisis here in America first. But anyway, Brad Pitt hasn't decided either, which is awkward, since he and Barack Obama are ninth cousins. Imagine the awkward Thanksgiving if he goes the John McCain route ...
[Photo: AP]


Make this your daily (heck, hourly) stop for a fresh serving of pop smarts and cool things from around Tampa Bay and the nation. Compiled by tbt* jack-of-all-trades Joshua Gillin and his merry band of rogue journalists, it pokes fun at ridiculous celebrity worship, collects entertainment tidbits and features fun links to amuse and amaze you and your friends.
Nader freaks, it's time for CHANGE.
Jolie, you best be taking those huge fake lips to the polling place on Eleckshun day and voting for your man Obama.
Don't pay no never-mind to those Nader freaks. They got to go.
Thanks for voting for me, and I'll see ya the next time that fool husband of yours is outta town.
Balack '08 -- ain't it great?
Posted by: My Name Be Balack Obama | September 07, 2008 at 04:21 AM
It is refreshing to hear that there are those among us who aren't willing to give their votes automatically to one of either of the two major parties. This is something all citizens should think about. Are there really any differences between the major parties? Don't they both owe the same allegiance to the same mega-corporations? The candidate who doesn't and who will end this country's quest for world domination is Ralph Nader. We must eliminate the assumption that our elected officials can only come from the two major parties, and it is to the country's detriment if we don't.
Posted by: Linda Hubner | August 20, 2008 at 03:07 PM
Since the corporate candidates do not differ substantially on the issues, Ms. Jolie should consider finding a candidate who truly represents her interests. I suggest Ralph Nader, who has no allegiance to the corporations which cause much of the suffering in the world. Ralph Nader has spent his life changing things for the better.
To Ms. Joie & others who want an end to the war, a stop to corporate abuses, and single payer health care- there is only one candidate who also wants these - Ralph Nader.
Posted by: Cara Campbell | August 20, 2008 at 12:12 PM
Good news. It shows she is a woman of reflection on top of being a woman of compassion.
As such she will probably favor the Nader/Gonzalez ticket as she demonstrates more political acumen than many in this country who are blindly siding with, and giving a blank check to a candidate who cannot give them what they want. A candidate sponsored by and thus representing corporations before people.
Posted by: Concerned Citizen | August 20, 2008 at 11:12 AM