O'Reilly Keeping Tabs on Me and Other Stuff
Tampabay.com

Comment Policy

    Please be sure your comments are appropriate before submitting them. Inappropriate comments include content that:
  • Is libelous
  • Is abusive, harassing, or threatening
  • Is obscene, vulgar, or profane
  • Is racially, ethnically or religiously offensive
  • Is illegal or encourages criminal acts
  • Is known to be inaccurate or contains a false attribution
  • Infringes copyrights, trademarks, publicity or any other rights of others
  • Impersonates anyone (actual or fictitious)
  • Solicits funds, goods or services, or advertises
  • The St. Petersburg Times does not edit posts but reserves the right to delete comments that violate our policy.

« Can the Collective Wisdom of the Net Outwit the MSM? | Main | How Will We Survive without Heroes? And are You a Grinch or a Peanuts Xmas Fan? »

December 01, 2006

O'Reilly Keeping Tabs on Me and Other Stuff

It was one of the stranger phone calls I've gotten in recent weeks, courtesy of my old pal, Fox News Channel gasbag Bill O'Reilly.Oreilly

It wasn't exactly from him, of course. It was a perky assistant named Rod, who had an odd request: Could I tell him whether I was a registered voter and if I had contributed to any political party?

This is, of course, a hot-button issue for some journalists, many of whom don't even vote at all to preserve their illusion of objectivity and disconnect from divisive political issues. According to Rod, O'Reilly was checking up on TV critics across the country using public records and phone calls like the one I was enduring at that moment.

Since I consider myself an opinion columnist and have not been shy about my political leanings in the past, I had no problem answering O'Reilly's questions, which are public record, anyway. (I haven't donated to any political party -- I think that's an odd crossing of the lines, from advocacy to action -- and i'm a reigstered Democrat. Surprise!)

Oreallybookcover I'm sure O'Reilly is expecting to prove that a majority of TV critics are Democrats and have given $$ to them (good luck on that last one; we barely make enough to afford the service fees on our TiVos).

I've always said that the standard for journalists, regardless of whether they write opinion or not, should be fairness. The very act of deciding that one issue makes a good story and another doesn't involves some side-taking. The goal is to be fair as possible, while informing readers as much as possible.

When that's your framework, it doesn't matter much what political party you belong to. But why should O'Reilly judge the nation's TV critics on our work?It's so much easier to damn us for our party affiliations.

Best of 2006 TV?

Heroeslogo It's never too early to start thinking on the one critic's obligation which never seems to go away: the year-end Best of List.

Trite? For sure. Predictable? Without a doubt. Formulaic?  Can there be anything more rote than a Top Ten, Top Five, Top Seven...?

But, you gotta admit, we love them.

Easy to write, fun to read (if done well), they're a convenient way to ruminate on yet anotherp op culture year gone by (don't you remember where you were when you heard Katie Couric was going to CBS?)

Dexter1a So I ask you, dear reader, what's your Top Moments?

I already imagine I'll be talking about Showtime's Dexter, Battlestar Galactica, Heroes, ER, Keith Olbermann, Sleeper Cell, Studio 60 and YouTube. But I want to know: What do YOU think?

ODDS AND ENDS

An example of what NOT to do when giving an interview about your awfully-named energy drink, Cocaine, to the Daily Show. HINT: Don't say, "If I was trying to target (inner city consumers) I would have called it crack." And don't admit that your drink causes a burning sensation in the back of your throat, either.

50 Cent says what some black fans have been grousing about for years: that Oprah has left her roots behind and become, in his words, an Oreo.

Prisonbreaktbag According to a survey sponsored by CBS, the top five shows adults watched with their kids this season includes a program in which two characters have been killed onscreen since the fall (ABC's Lost), a show in which an escaped prisoner has lsot his hand, again (Prison Break) and a program in which a character snapped and gunned down two people in grocery store being shot to death herself (Desperate Housewives). Guess I'm a wimp for limiting our family viewing to Deal or No Deal, Dancing with the Stars, Heroes, the Biggest Loser and Dirty Jobs.

   

Comments

so, rather than using the usual research tools to find out if youve donated to pols, oreilly's clueless minion just asked you upfront? isnt that a wife-beating type question? oh right. tv journalism.
aside from that, as one who has been around newsrooms for 30-odd years, i cant ever recall even once hearing anyone evince even the slightest sympathy for republican or conservative causes or pols. but there is much smug assumption of shared liberal or democratic values. in short, there is no shortage of cheering in the pressbox for your side. many are so dumb as to not realize they are supposed to hide their leanings at least nominally. so does that mono-culture ever slip into the news columns? um. yes. does the fairness line continually wobble all over the map? oh. no question.
is it revealing to find out when journos really cross the line and give money or campaign? i suppose, if you really need confirmation of the obvious.

Near the top of my 2006 list is "Ugly Betty." Sincere at all the right times and campy when it needs to be, the show is well-written, made and imagined. A refreshing show indeed.

"It feels like it rhymes with everything, even when it don't."

And this guy is teaching 8th grade ENGLISH???? America is doomed.

Heroes as "family viewing?"

First, I LOVE the show, it's one of the most creative things I've seen in years, and the respect and love it shows to the comic book genre is perfect.

BUt, while some of the messages are positive, in addition to drug abuse and adultry, the show has had a number of savage murders, including the routine sawing of the tops of people's heads off, very bloody beatings, and even "comic book violence" that still is pretty graphic.

Great show? Absolutely... but if I had children, I seriously doubt I'd allow them to watch it because of the violence.

You make a great point Mark.

But I've watched the lord of the Ringsm ovies with my kids and there's a scene at the end of the frist one where a guy is pincushioned with five arrows before his head is cut off -- a fate that also quickly befalls the thing which kills him.

Broadcasting and Cable magazien noted: "The show, which airs at 9 p.m. ET, is the No. 10 primetime network series among kids 2-11, and NBC’s second-highest-rated series in the demo, behind Deal or No Deal. Among kids 12-17, it ranks sixth overall and No. 1 for NBC."

Creator Tim Kring says he is going to try toning down the violence in episodes to come. But stuff that happens in tonight's episode makes me wonder if he'll be able to pull that one off...And now i'm really embarassed about my own choices...

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

About This Blog

The Feed is a blog on TV, media and modern life by St. Petersburg Times TV/media critic Eric Deggans. Possibly the most critical guy at the Times, he has served as music, media and TV critic at various times over 10 years.

E-mail Eric Deggans: deggans@sptimes.com

Subscribe to this Blog

Add to your Technorati Favorites

Add to Technorati Favorites

Advertisement


Blogs that Link to The Feed