Golden Globe Funk: Why Do Our Older Actors Seem to be Losing It?
Tampabay.com

Comment Policy

    Please be sure your comments are appropriate before submitting them. Inappropriate comments include content that:
  • Is libelous
  • Is abusive, harassing, or threatening
  • Is obscene, vulgar, or profane
  • Is racially, ethnically or religiously offensive
  • Is illegal or encourages criminal acts
  • Is known to be inaccurate or contains a false attribution
  • Infringes copyrights, trademarks, publicity or any other rights of others
  • Impersonates anyone (actual or fictitious)
  • Solicits funds, goods or services, or advertises
  • The St. Petersburg Times does not edit posts but reserves the right to delete comments that violate our policy.

Bubba's Wedding Album | Main | America Idol Returns: The Ritual of Humiliation Has Begun ยป

January 16, 2007

Golden Globe Funk: Why Do Our Older Actors Seem to be Losing It?

Beattynbc_1 Midway through Warren Beatty's rambling acceptance of a lifetime achievement award at Monday night's Golden Globes awards, a thought kept crossing my mind.

What is this guy talking about?

Nevermind that it has been a solid 25 years since Beatty made a groundbreaking film (presenter Tom Hanks, in true Hollywood fashion, kept equating his "balls" with artistic vision). In taking his star turn Monday night, Beatty offered a rambling, disjointed acceptance speech that managed to point out a painful truth: all the other aged heavyweights in the audience -- Jack Nicholson, Clint Eastwood, Martin Scorsese -- have managed some kickass work in the last few years.

"I have moisterizer at home older than Tom Hanks," cracked Beatty, stumbling into the irony that Hanks, at age 50 with about 40 projects to his credit, is an aging veteran in an industry where thirtysomethings like DiCaprio and Pitt are becoming elder statesmen.

Denirogqcover It all brought to mind something I noticed after completing an excruciating profile of Robert DeNiro is a recent G.Q. magazine -- in which the notoriously press-shy actor/director grew so agitated by the writer's probing questions that he essentially reneged on a promise to sit for a four-hour interview (Deniro being the star he is, he still got his cover, though). It seems that actors we've come to love who made their bones in the '70s have slowly turned into eccentric, impenetrable oddities right before our eyes.Nicholsonrs

Admittedly, I'm basing most of these observations on press interviews: Beatty's oddball Q&A with Premire magazine last year ("I used to say that, for me, making a movie was like vomiting") Nicholson's even odder talk with Rolling Stone (on why he doesn't like using a condom: "And when this idea became popular, the sex-negative, pleasure-denial momentum of the world, I mean, it just got to the point where 'I can't do this anymore.' It was no longer the full catastrophe."); Pacino and Hoffman's emotional turns on Inside the Actors' Studio. It seems these guys just can't help letting the weird out when reporters are around.

Have they had too many years of being treated like the funniest/smartest/sexiest guy in the room? Have their formative years in the hippy-dippy '60s finally caught up to them? Of them all, Eastwood consistently comes off best -- refusing to accept the indulgences of celebrity and enjoying his late-in-life career surge with a seemingly geniune gratitude that buys a lot of forgiveness.

Mirren Awards-wise, I was disappointed yet again in this year's crop of TV category winners. The Globes like to tease with a promising group of nominees (except for shutting out HBO's excellent The Wire), but this year's crop of winners betrayed a disturbingly anglo-philic focus on British actors and TV shows -- even for a group called the Hollywood Foriegn Press Association.

House's Hugh Laurie took a best drama honor that should have gone to Dexter's Michael C. Hall. Other honors went to Emily Blunt for an unknown BBC production, Jeremy Irons and Helen Mirren for HBO's Elizabeth I, and Bill Nighy???, who somehow edged out Andre Brauhger and Robert Duvall for best tv movie actor.

Even Nighy acknowledged the mistake, noting in his acceptance speech that he had "already apologized to Robert Duvall" before loosing the second-best line of the night (see Sasha Baron Cohen's comments for the best lines): "I used to think prizes were damaging and divisive; until I got one. Now, they seem sort of meaningful and real."

Good choices: The Closer's Kyra Sedgwick and 30 rock's Alec Baldwin. A TV star was born before ourBettycast  eyes with America Ferrera's well-deserved win for her portrayal which anchors ABc's newest hit, Ugly Betty (and with bombshells like Salma Hayek and Vanessa Williams involved, was there ever a show with a more ironic name?)   

Worst choice: Grey's Anatomy as best TV drama? Over 24's most kickass season ever and freshman hit Heroes? Seems like some voters in the HFPA were smoking some leftover props from Showtime's drug dealing series Weeds.

Tampa Bay TV Stations Make a Mint

---TV stations in the Tampa-St. Petersburg market made $370-million in 2006, according to an analyst's report quoted by Broadcasting & Cable in an eye-opening profile of the market. Other nuggets: leading stations WFLA-Ch. 8 and WTVT-Ch. 13 each made about 24 percent of the market's total take (which I assume was so high because of the enormous level of political advertising) and WFTS-Ch. 28 expects a boost from old school syndication champs Jeopardy and Wheel of fortune, which move to the ABC affiliate in September.

Jenniferanistondirtfxpremierescreening1f ---WTVT is going to feature a TV show based on the entertainment Web site TMZ.com, thanks to a deal bringing the show to all of Fox's owned and operated stations nationwide.

---In a desperate bid to rescue her show on the tabloid magazine industry from a mountain of bad reviews, former friend Courteny Cox is calling on a friend of her own -- colleague Jennifer Aniston, who will appear on FX's Dirt as a rival magazine editor for the show's March 27 series finale. Of course, by then it may be too little too late...

   (as always, click on any image to enlarge)

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

HJP

As an old English thinkier once said: "There are none so blind as those who will not see."

Appropriate saying that applies to you and Nikki as well.

Eric Deggans

As an old English thinkier once said: "There are none so blind as those who will not see."

No doubt Nikki's high strung and given to crusades and grudges, but her observations are usually sharp and spot-on. She's fearless and exhibits zero tolerance for BS.

Sorry you don't agree...

HJP

To Eric Deggans: Oh please, you choose a column by Nikki Finke, THE Nikki Finke who has a serious stick up her you know what as far as Beatty's concerned? This person is so extremely biased in the negative that she doesn't even stay away from personal insults, simply because she seems to have some intense dislike of ANYTHING remotely to do with Beatty. (I mean, her column describing him as stiffly moving around on spindly legs when he helped the nurses beat Schwarzeneggers costly and unnecessary elections back in November?)
Besides: his speech was 6 minutes long, which is still closer to 5 minutes, than to ten, just to show from what angle ANY column by this "award winning columnist" is coming from. Pity, you might have been able to convince me had you not used this sad prejudiced columnist as an example. (shaking my head)

Joel

And 1:21 proves my point, though I did misquote slightly - reality, not the real America.

Eric - I'm sure you were going for at least 70% facetiousness, but I do hope you know I'm not quite ready yet to lump you with the gossipy snarkmongers (?).

The reason I keep coming back here is that a large majority of what you right possesses just the right amount of thoughtfulness to make it worth reading. There's also a great balance between the posters who do just mention the big name to get readers, and the ones who make fun just to get readers and make themselves feel better.

As an aside, I do find myself often more interested in the bites that don't make your print stories than the stuff that does make the cut. And this from a guy who hates most DVD deleted scenes.

dreaming

i thought the nicholson rs iview was pretty funny, but deniro, beatty and eastwood make some of the lamest interview subjects in hollywood. they are much better seen than heard. why? well they are actors, not interview givers. deniro especially is painful to watch being interviewed. he and eastwood were both stiff as boards on larry king recently. imagine if questions get a little probing. oh boy....

Eric Deggans

I have no idea who this Jane Genova is, but i'm praying your citation of her is a dry joke can't appreciate because I fend off so much nonsense from other blog posters all day.

Assuming you're serious -- I mean, this woman didn't even get Sacha Baron Cohen's hilarious testicles-in-the-face joke during his acceptance speech -- let me present the blog of an award-winning entertainment industry columnist from Los Angeles.

She also has the insight to agree with me about Beatty's speech, which started well but devolved into a rambling, overlong self-indulgent mess that made it harder for all the winners who followed him to get more than a few seconds' screen time.

Here it is:
http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/golden-globes-running-awards-blog-contains-spoilers/

HJP

Here's a link to a page by someone who DOES have a clue about the brilliance of Warren Beatty AND his speech:
http://speechwriting-ghostwriting.typepad.com/speechwriting_ghostwritin/2007/01/warren_beattys_.html

Eric Deggans

Oundits and opinionmeisters taking silly quotes out of context? Just to attach a bgi name to their blog posting -- I mean, uh, reports -- in order to snag some much-needed readership?

Never! At least, um, not that we would admit to...

I must be missing something. Borat was painfully boring and contrived. It was Jackass without the stunts. And Streep for Devil Wears Prada? Was that even a comedy? Even looking at Anne Hathaway couldn't make that movie bearable! I'd like to agree that the voters must have been smoking something, but I think it's just that Hollywood is completely out of touch with reality.

Joel

But how different are the idiosyncracies of these older actors from those of the actors who weren't alive during Beatty's prime?

It just seems like people like Beatty, Nicholson and Co. aged into an era where all that bad and eccentric behavior just matters more.

I can't swear to it since I wasn't alive during Beatty's prime either, but based on what I've seen and read the attitude towards celebrity was different. Maybe people were aware that these people were kind of off, but it just wasn't important as long as they were doing good work (maybe that's the problem - with the exception of Eastwood, most of them aren't doing good work).

Today all those odd soundbites are just used as ammunition for snarky declarations of just how darned human they are. Or in the case of people of a certain political persuasion, of how out of touch they are with the "real" America.

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.

About This Blog

The Feed is a blog on TV, media and modern life by St. Petersburg Times TV/media critic Eric Deggans. Possibly the most critical guy at the Times, he has served as music, media and TV critic at various times over 10 years.

E-mail Eric Deggans: deggans@sptimes.com
Get updates from The Feed via Twitter

Subscribe to this Blog

Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe in NewsGator Online Google Reader or Homepage

The Feed on Facebook

Add to your Technorati Favorites

Add to Technorati Favorites

Advertisement


Blogs that Link to The Feed

Awards and honors

Ebonypower

Sunshine