Why won't TV networks admit when a show is canceled?
Tampabay.com

Comment Policy

    Please be sure your comments are appropriate before submitting them. Inappropriate comments include content that:
  • Is libelous
  • Is abusive, harassing, or threatening
  • Is obscene, vulgar, or profane
  • Is racially, ethnically or religiously offensive
  • Is illegal or encourages criminal acts
  • Is known to be inaccurate or contains a false attribution
  • Infringes copyrights, trademarks, publicity or any other rights of others
  • Impersonates anyone (actual or fictitious)
  • Solicits funds, goods or services, or advertises
  • The St. Petersburg Times does not edit posts but reserves the right to delete comments that violate our policy.

Meeting Billy Mays: The Voice that launched $1 billion in sales | Main | Three journalism heavyweights visit Tampa Bay area this week »

April 10, 2009

Why won't TV networks admit when a show is canceled?

Rejected-do-not-disturb2 I thought it was a simple question. But I should have known there is no such thing when the question involves TV networks and their programming.

Looking at a list of TV shows which were no longer airing, readers wanted to know: Had they been canceled? Were they simply on hiatus? Could a public response bring them back?

My first call, to a publicist for the CW to ask about its long-gone reality show Stylista, yielded a typical response, on background of course: The network hadn’t ordered any new shows and wasn’t airing the old ones. So, it’s probably canceled. But not officially.

A request to NBC over a long list of their uncertain series – Lipstick Jungle (below), Knight Rider, Chopping Block and America’s Toughest Jobs among them – brought a similar response on background, revealing that only one program, Toughest Jobs, was officially gone. Jungle was probably gone, Chopping Block is airing on NBC.com and Knight Rider won’t be resolved until May, when the network’s new fall schedule is Large_lipstickjung released.

So, at a time when audiences have never been less certain about when shows are airing or for how long, why are the networks so squirrelly about admitting when a show is dead?

An informal poll of TV show creators I know didn’t yield many results, either. “The only thing I can think of is that these folks are highly indecisive, and decisions often take weeks or months to get made,” emailed one Emmy-winning creator who has had a few series canceled. “Some of the weirdness in admitting a show is canceled may really be weirdness about DECIDING a show is canceled.”

Rod Lurie, creator of the ABC drama Commander in Chief, had another take: “I suppose, and it’s just a guess, that the networks always want to leave a tiny door open just in case they get seller's remorse when they decide to dump a show -- like the way they reversed course on Jericho (at CBS).”

Fortunately, Tim Brooks, a retired, former executive at NBC, USA Networks and Lifetime – and co-author of the exhaustive Complete Directory to Prime Time Network and Cable TV Shows – had a few answers.

“The networks see nothing to gain by announcing a cancellation,” said Brooks. “They might irritate some creators or actors they want to work with who don’t to see press stories about ‘So-and-so went down in flames again,’ and they want to keep their options open.”

Pushingdaisies Brooks said networks usually only announce a shows cancellation if they think a pocket of fans will show up to boost ratings (ABC’s Life on Mars and Pushing Daisies). And while it’s easy to blame programmers for shifting shows around so much, that’s often an indication that a network is trying not to give up on a failing show, he said.

“The financing is so challenging on some of these shows, they are literally making decisions on them week to week,” he said. “One executive once said ‘Nothing’s ever canceled – it just goes on hiatus.’ And some shows have been on hiatus for 40 years.”

So if you’re having trouble figuring out whether a show has been canceled or not, you’re not alone.

And it’s on purpose. Does that make the frustration any easier to handle?

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Blaine

The Prender.to and Early Edition and I also mis the network U.P.N.

Blaine

My so called life. I miss that show so much.

My 2 cents

Is is just me or does it seem like a 'season' for ANY show is only, like 4 episodes in a row; then the show is off the air for an undeterminable amount of time, then, maybe - just maybe - it returns. Confuses and frustrates the heck out of me.

Amanda

I'm still upset ABC canceled October Road... that show was awesome.

RagsTTiger

It does surprise me a bit that more old shows don't run on cable. Cable channel capacity isn't even close to being fully used. Just a handful of channels, running short run series could fill the void. 8Prime is basically doing that with their digital nostalgia channel, except they are rerunning long series products.

Juggling shows continually is a kiss of death. WKRP being a prime example. CBS had it on a number of different times and days, with some long hiatus time in between. WKRP went on to be a blockbuster in syndication.

Another show, ABC, that had a short run, despite a loyal following was Sports Night. A funny set-up of ESPN's Sports Center (also part of the ABC family) ABC changed its spot so many times it failed to garner a large enough audience.

Fox seems to have short run series pop up all the time.

RagsTTiger

Keeping a sliver of light for a return allows the networks options. Now many networks have two seasons, instead of a winter (fall) season and summer reruns.

I often wondered why the networks didn't at least have a tie up the loose ends episode in the bag. This would be aired if the show was put on hiatus, without enough previously produced episodes in the can for syndication.

Many surmise that the reason The Fugitive's so-so ratings in syndication was that everyone knew the answer. Also, I believe most of the series were filmed in B&W. That doesn't help.

Fox has been known to pull a show, e.g. Vanished, without a broadcast finale. Showing the last few episodes on the internet only is not a good practice, regardless of the evolving convergence philosophy.

Leaving an end of the year "cliffhanger" to get buzz keeping the viewers loyal during the summer. This practice also provides fodder for entertain "news" shows and other mindless fare.

Nothing to do but wait for the Up Fronts and speculate.

Chuck Welch

So I shouldn't give up on seeing "No Soap, Radio" again?

I've gotten to the point that I'm not picking up new shows until the first season is on DVD. It's not worth investing my time on a show they'll pull after a few episodes.

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.

About This Blog

The Feed is a blog on TV, media and modern life by St. Petersburg Times TV/media critic Eric Deggans. Possibly the most critical guy at the Times, he has served as music, media and TV critic at various times over 10 years.

E-mail Eric Deggans: deggans@sptimes.com
Get updates from The Feed via Twitter

Subscribe to this Blog

Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe in NewsGator Online Google Reader or Homepage

The Feed on Facebook

Add to your Technorati Favorites

Add to Technorati Favorites

Advertisement


Blogs that Link to The Feed

Awards and honors

Ebonypower

Sunshine