Pearlman/Trans Continental trustee Soneet Kapila has updated his frequently asked questions to respond to some questions raised here that I posed to him. Unfortunately, the response is that these are complicated legal issues. Here's what he says:
How broadly are you planning to stake your claim to any recoveries that investors make from third parties?
If, for example, an investor wins a judgment against an independent sales agent who sold the EISA plan, or wins a judgment against others involved in the scam, would you (as Trustee) sue the investor to claim the award for the bankruptcy estate?
SK: These questions raise complex legal issues that would require some in-depth analysis on the rights and claims of the individual investors as opposed to the rights and claims that I have as the Chapter 11 Trustee for Pearlman, TCA and other related companies for which I may be named Chapter 11 Trustee in the future. These are complex legal questions that require the advice of a lawyer and depend on the facts that exist for each case. Each investor may have a different fact scenario. I am not in a position to provide legal advice.
On the theory of “constructive trust”, do you have an opinion on whether EISA investors could be considered to have placed their money with Trans Continental as a trustee rather than as a borrower? If you as a trustee were to accept this theory and the judge would agree, would you apply the same treatment to all the EISA investors or only to those that submitted a constructive trust argument with their claim forms?
SK: This question raises a complex legal theory that cannot be easily or generally stated. The ability of any investor to pursue a constructive trust claim against an estate will depend heavily on the facts of each individual case.
Other coverage:
Orlando Sentinel story on Church Street Station.
Recent Comments