It didn't take long for things to heat up in the discrimination case pending against Raymond James Financial Inc. Three former employees sued Raymond James Sept. 25 in the U.S. District Court for the Norther District of Illlinois, accusing the company of discrimination based on gender, age and national origin. They want their suit to be granted status as a class action including many current Raymond James employees. The company responded with this memo
posted on the company intranet. That prompted lawyers for the three women to file this motion asking for a "corrective notice" and for a requirement that Raymond James get court approval before broadcasting notices to employees who might be part of the class.
The women initially filed their claims with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Raymond James responded. The women then asked for the authority to sue Raymond James, which the EEOC granted, dropping its own investigation. The EEOC did not rule on the complaints.
Lawyers for the women say Raymond James misrepresented the situation by claiming that it refuted the allegations and demonstrated that all employment decisions were proper and appropriate. The Raymond James memo also states that the company "believes these complaints to be wholly unjustified, intends to defend itself vigorously and expects that the charges will ultimately be dismissed by the court."
The memo also directed employees with questions or concerns about the lawsuit to contact the company's legal department and reminded them that they aren't allowed to talk to the media about the lawsuit. Lawyers for the women plaintiffs say Raymond James' instructions are intimidating.
Any women who have worked at Raymond James in the past who would like to comment on the lawsuit and share their experience are invited to email me (hhuntley@sptimes.com). Please don't contact me, however, unless you are willing to have your name published. Thanks.
Update: Raymond James agreed to remove the memo from the company intranet.
Another Update: Raymond James filed this motion to dismiss with this supporting legal memo.
Recent Comments