Soneet Kapila goes after John Regna and Stuart Harrington for fraudulent transfers
Lou Pearlman bankruptcy trustee Soneet Kapila has filed two major fraud and asset recovery cases against two people who helped Pearlman obtain money from banks.
The bigger case in terms of money is against Stuart Harrington, who is accused of arranging bank loans for Pearlman and, at least some of the time, claiming to the banks that he was chief financial officer for Pearlman and his various companies. During the two years leading up to the bankruptcy filings, Pearlman and his companies transferred at least $1.3-million to Harrington and $1.8-million to North American Capital Markets. If you go back four years, the numbers are larger.
The case against Regna and his company, World Entertainment Associates of America, accuses him of taking Pearlman's personal property--even loading up the jet skis behind Lou's house and taking them away after Kapila had put them up for auction. The lawsuit references $416,000 in Pearlman-related funds turned over to Regna, $60,000 given to a law firm for his benefit and $50,000 in two-year transfers to World Entertainment.
"While Pearlman was out of this jurisdiction, he was in constant contact with Regna by telephone and electronic mail prusuant to which he provided direction to Regna about payments to third parties and the marshalling of Pearlman's personal belongings," the suit says.
Of course, Kapila wants it all back.

St. Petersburg Times personal finance editor Helen Huntley writes about money topics and answers questions about financial planning, investments and personal income taxes.
Are you a fish?
Posted by: | July 23, 2008 at 09:00 AM
I don't post without using my name, I just haven't been posting that often, thank you very much. I refuse to feed the trolls and that seems to be all that has been posting lately. Trust me when I say I am not afraid to put my name with my opinions, such as the fact that you are trying to bait me now.
Posted by: Kim | July 21, 2008 at 09:39 PM
Is Pearlman legally able to retrieve any hidden funds when he gets released?
Posted by: | July 21, 2008 at 03:44 PM
He's not doing it for free. You are paying for it. He's working under a contract with the pubic defender's office.
Posted by: | July 21, 2008 at 01:46 PM
Hidden Money
Posted by: | July 21, 2008 at 01:00 PM
Publicity and name recognition is my guess?
Posted by: | July 21, 2008 at 12:07 PM
Why is Pearlman's lawyer handling the case for free, as he is in private practice?
Posted by: | July 21, 2008 at 11:59 AM
Annoymously, please
Posted by: | July 21, 2008 at 11:17 AM
Hey Jeff, you in the box. I have a questionable e-mail which could be fraudulent, not on this topic completely different. Would like to send it to you or report somehow?
Posted by: | July 21, 2008 at 11:11 AM
9;53 "Comments that make sense", we don't want to leave you out, do we? You have a right to speak.
Posted by: | July 21, 2008 at 10:08 AM
Can you imagine deleted posts returned? My favorite was the ex-employee. That person had the most intresting information.
Posted by: | July 21, 2008 at 10:04 AM
Helen, I recommend extending the rules for commenting here. Give no room for all this bs chitchat or sneering at each other. Only allow comments or questions that make sense. Also changing back the reading order to from top to bottom would help some, I think. Thank you and keep up the good work!
Posted by: | July 21, 2008 at 09:53 AM
Kim why did you stop signing your name after your posts, You were always so proud to do that. We still know who you are, you do know that?
Posted by: | July 21, 2008 at 08:56 AM
Thank you Joe
Posted by: | July 21, 2008 at 08:47 AM
I need it.
Posted by: Joe | July 20, 2008 at 11:21 PM
Be proud of us, Helen. For the most part we ignored the TROLL... Yours is still the best source of information for us! Again, THANK YOU!
Posted by: | July 20, 2008 at 10:35 PM
How so?
Posted by: | July 20, 2008 at 08:44 PM
Actually it seems Mandy ended up the best out of all of us.
Posted by: | July 20, 2008 at 05:51 PM
Any word on action against Mandy, Fischetti, Finger, etc???
Posted by: BB | July 20, 2008 at 04:24 PM
just kidding whats up jeff?
Posted by: | July 20, 2008 at 01:47 PM
Free big popa, this is what members of his bands called him? What did he do for you and I don't mean professionally?
Posted by: | July 20, 2008 at 01:17 PM
Who created the free big poppa website??
Posted by: | July 20, 2008 at 12:42 PM
It is not harassment it is a difference of opionion which I am entitled and feel very fortunate to have.
Posted by: | July 20, 2008 at 08:36 AM
Helen, I believe you have some people you do need to apoligize to, dont you?
Posted by: | July 20, 2008 at 08:34 AM
Oh your talking about 1:57 don't worry we just ignore her.
Posted by: | July 20, 2008 at 08:29 AM
Dear blog readers--I apologize again for the harassment visited upon us by a couple of people. I cannot imagine why anyone would get a thrill out of anonymously harassing people, but someone obviously does.
Helen
Posted by: Helen Huntley | July 20, 2008 at 08:21 AM
ACLU
Posted by: | July 19, 2008 at 04:27 PM
Congratulations Bob you looked up the First Amendment and even used it in a sentence. Good Job.
Posted by: | July 19, 2008 at 04:07 PM
Congratulations Bob you must have looked up the first Ammendment and you even used it in a sentence. Great Job.
Posted by: | July 19, 2008 at 04:04 PM
To 1:57
It doesn't take much to get "THEM" to come out of the woodwork.
I got "THEM" Going yesterday. It's real easy, all you have to do is exercise your own 1st.
Good show.
Posted by: Bob West | July 19, 2008 at 03:30 PM
You are anti-American if you do not respect the United States Constitution. You probably don't even know what it says.
Posted by: | July 19, 2008 at 02:42 PM
To the idiot who keeps using the 1st Ammendment as an excuse to be obnoxious,self-centered,rude:Once you've spoken your piece and expressed your opinion there's no reason to keep repeating it over and over again, especially to people who are clearly showing disinterest.If this is how you conduct yourself outside this blog,it is clearly the reason you have nothing else to do and no one who will listen to you.You have much deeper problems and you obviously know this, as well.Find somewhere else to post your graffiti because that's all it is. Littering the board with your nonsense to get attention.That's all there is to it.
Posted by: | July 19, 2008 at 01:57 PM
I meant he is due to be released from jail March 2029, less than 21 years from today.
Posted by: | July 18, 2008 at 03:04 PM
He is due to be released in March 2009
Posted by: | July 18, 2008 at 03:04 PM
Excuse me, 10:22 am.
Posted by: | July 18, 2008 at 12:31 PM
9am, you just removed an intelligent and reasonable post.
Posted by: | July 18, 2008 at 12:30 PM
Name calling very Professional by the way. D
Posted by: | July 18, 2008 at 11:39 AM
First Ammendment Advocates
"Censorship reflects a society's lack of confidence in itself. It is a hallmark of an authoritarian regime" Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart (1966) D
Posted by: | July 18, 2008 at 11:34 AM
9 a.m.--There are many "anything goes" places on the Internet. I suggest you post at one of them.
Posted by: Helen Huntley | July 18, 2008 at 10:22 AM
Why don't you create an anything goes space Helen, and your own space? That way you are not assaulting freedom of speech issues? Please explain if you see it any other way? Or does your love affair with the "fab four" trump everything? By the way, the "fab four" could have blown the whistle months before they did. Not so fab.
Posted by: | July 18, 2008 at 09:00 AM
Helen is there no room to post or do you not like the posts? I believe I said earlier I am looking for the truth and won't stop until I find it. Does that bother you? D
Posted by: | July 18, 2008 at 07:40 AM
The truth must ruin it for all.
Posted by: | July 18, 2008 at 07:31 AM
The troll who has no life other than posting on this blog has created problems for all those who wish to post.
Posted by: Helen Huntley | July 17, 2008 at 08:29 PM
Where did all the comments go??????????
Posted by: | July 17, 2008 at 08:02 PM