In defense of Ashton Kutcher
It is time to give a fair shake to Ashton Kutcher, as if enough cool things haven’t happened in his life. From his irrationally perfect genes to marrying Demi Moore, Kutcher’s fortune almost demands to be despised.
Those haters should lay off. Anyone paying attention after That 70’s Show and Dude, Where’s My Car? notices how Kutcher cannily parlayed fame as a producer: deflating celebrities on MTV’s Punk’d, punking paparazzi with Pop Fiction and turning the potentially degrading Beauty and the Geek into a sweetly empowering reality show.
Kutcher jumps into acting now and then, usually over his head in dramatic roles that his pretty-boy image won’t allow viewers to accept. Which brings us to What Happens in Vegas, and the role making Kutcher into a bona fide romantic comedy star.
He plays Jack Fuller, a man-child whose own father (Treat Williams) fires him from a job for goofing off. Jack isn’t marriage material and he’s proud of it, preferring the company of his bad-influence buddy (Rob Corddry). They impulsively decide to blow off steam in Las Vegas, where the opposite Jack will attract is also heading.
Nothing is impulsive about Joy McNally (Cameron Diaz), an
uptight person who “makes plans to make plans” when she isn’t stressing
out as a Wall Street floor trader. Joy’s type-A+ personality turns off
her fiancé (Jason Sudekeis), who dumps her while their closest
friends listen, ready to spring a surprise birthday party. Joy also has
a bad influence, a tart-tongued bartender (Lake Bell) who proposes their Vegas fling.
Director Tom Vaughn buoyantly bounces between Jack and Joy’s set-ups, their meet-cute in Sin City and a dazzling montage of their drunken one-night stand. Then the hook: Sometime during the evening Jack and Joy get married. Before an annulment can be filed, a slot machine dishes out a $3-million jackpot they must remain married six months to claim.
Jack and Joy can’t stand each other so naturally they’re perfect together, according to rom-com protocol. What Happens in Vegas occupies a familiar battleground of the sexes, stretches the inevitable too far and commits too many other non-surprises to be anything close to creative entertainment.
Happens all the time but typically with less straining to improvise and boast about it as a benefit later on talk shows. This cast trusts Dana Fox’s screenplay that isn’t overly clever but respects the sidekick rhythm of romantic comedy. Verbal thrusts and parries sound natural since each supporting actor – especially Corddry’s glazed chauvinist pig – respects the jokes.
They don’t need to push it with such a star coupling at center stage. Diaz is a pro at such fluff now. Kutcher can be, like another survivor of a dumb TV show who made a splash in movies, married solid and kept a level head while maturing with lively class.
Sorry, haters. Ashton Kutcher may be the 21st century Tom Hanks.


Steve Persall is the movie critic for the St. Petersburg Times. He was conceived behind a drive-in movie theater his father operated and raised in projection booths and concession stands. He doesn't care how you did it up north.
I really like Ashton Kutcher and think he is quite underrated as an actor (my husband is gagging as I tell him I am writing this! He puts Ashton in his "wooden" category with Orlando Bloom and Keanu Reeves). I absolutely agree with you Steve. I really liked A lot Like Love and The Guardian.
Posted by: Emily | May 10, 2008 at 12:03 AM
Thanks, Emily. I think some non-believers will be surprised.
There's a scene late in the movie when Kutcher has to play some "weight" as his character considers a nasty con of Diaz's character but he's falling for her. His hair is maturely combed, his suit is sharp and sees spies Diaz gliding toward him. The next 30 seconds gave me goosebumps that only pop up when I sense something special where it isn't expected.
It is a truly romantic movie moment that convinced me to take my angle in the review. Thanks for agreeing, and enjoy the movie.
Posted by: Steve Persall | May 10, 2008 at 10:22 AM
it seems like in real life, in general, Kutcher is savvier than the average Hollywood folk
Posted by: patrick | June 05, 2008 at 12:34 PM
I think you're right, Patrick. Savvy, safer and as successful as he deserves.
Posted by: Steve Persall | June 05, 2008 at 02:36 PM