From the Times:
By Marlene Sokol
TAMPA PALMS — Warren Dixon starts his walks at 5 a.m. so he can go with his wife, a defense consultant who works long hours.
Dixon doesn't work anymore, and maybe that's the problem. At 64, the
retired combat pilot and military lawyer is a bureaucrat's nightmare.
He has time, money, a law degree — and an issue.
The city government is poised to build a bridge over a highway, carrying traffic into the stately community of Tampa Palms.
Drivers will come from as far as Pasco County. Knowing the gridlocked
Bruce B. Downs Boulevard awaits, they will find their way over
Interstate 75 to Commerce Park Boulevard until they reach the road
Dixon can see from his lanai.
That's Tampa Palms Boulevard — Dixon's walking route.
• • •
Planners use words like grid and connectivity to explain the need for
newer, arguably better transportation routes. In New Tampa, officials
say the burden is especially great because growth management laws meant
to limit sprawl give developers more freedom in older sections of the
city.
New Tampa must follow concurrency, which prevents new development from
overwhelming existing government services. "And so, when a development
comes into being, the transportation requirements are more onerous up
here," said Steve Daignault, Tampa's public works administrator.
Tampa Palms, which is one of New Tampa's oldest developments and has
homes priced at $1 million, sits in the path of the 1990s building
boom. State and regional agencies approved a host of neighborhoods
assuming the bridge would be built, Daignault said.
But, in voluminous papers and e-mails, Dixon asks why.
City officials had hoped for an east-west highway connector to
Interstate 275, which might have taken some of the bridge traffic.
Using a software expression, Dixon calls it "a vaporware road."
Having collected impact fees and needing to satisfy concurrency,
officials must do something. In Dixon's view, they are covering their
tracks.
In one paper, he asserts that the city is using Tampa Palms Boulevard
as a substitute for the east-west highway "because functionaries in the
city government, during the time of the approval of the 40-plus
subdivisions, did not do their job." He accuses them of "malfeasance in
office."
Daignault says it would be unfair to compare the bridge to the
east-west highway: One was always written into city plans, the other
never received impact-fee money and wasn't a sure thing. Nor does he
agree that the east-west road would reduce bridge traffic, as it would
pick up a different population of drivers.
The city's position is simple, he said: New Tampa needs a road network, and even Tampa Palms can't stand in the way.
"I'm not a lawyer," said Daignault. "I can tell you that whenever a
project is built, the people in the surrounding areas are affected. …
It is a city road network that we certainly want to try to provide the
maximum use for all of the folks."
Recent Comments