Ante Up | tampabay.com - St. Petersburg Times and tbt*: Archives
Tampabay.com

Past episodes

Click on these links to hear past episodes of Ante Up!

Comment Policy

    Please be sure your comments are appropriate before submitting them. Inappropriate comments include content that:
  • Is libelous
  • Is abusive, harassing, or threatening
  • Is obscene, vulgar, or profane
  • Is racially, ethnically or religiously offensive
  • Is illegal or encourages criminal acts
  • Is known to be inaccurate or contains a false attribution
  • Infringes copyrights, trademarks, publicity or any other rights of others
  • Impersonates anyone (actual or fictitious)
  • Solicits funds, goods or services, or advertises
  • The St. Petersburg Times does not edit posts but reserves the right to delete comments that violate our policy.

« January 2008 | Main | March 2008 »

February 29, 2008

Episode #142: Heads Up With Michael Craig

Michaelcraig1MAIN TOPIC

Full Tilt "red pro" Michael Craig joins us from Las Vegas to assess the field for NBC's National Heads-Up Poker Championship, which begins today. Michael will be covering the tournament on his excellent blog. He named a guy I've never heard of as a possible winner. Where is Chris when I need him? Chris would have heard of this guy! Craig also has some tips for playing limit heads up and recounts his very good day on Full Tilt this week. How good? Let's just say he puts my cash in Full Tilt's $26 token frenzy to shame. Click here to listen to the show.

OTHER TOPICS

Chris: Who? Oh yeah, him. The painkillers are working, and he's still got a few one-liners left in his trembling frame. Seriously, he's doing fine, resting at home, and we miss him. Kind of.

Daytona: Scott and another one of his gearhead adventures. But with a poker ending.

Full Tilt:  Uncle Tilty has made it easier for Scott to replenish his account. Either that, or they were going to have to start offering 23-cent sit-n-gos. Plus some other good changes at our favorite, totally random, poker site.

21: Mark your calendars for March 23, opening day for a movie about the MIT blackjack card counters that looks pretty good.

Hot Line: We have a call from a listener with a good technical suggestion involving PSP and RSS and some other stuff. Most of you will understand it. Scott, however ... He actually said this before today's show while staring at a laptop: "Where's the 'on' button?"

Tampa Bay Poker Replay: Scott tries a NL O8B tournament, and a knucklehead tries my patience.

HAND OF THE WEEK

I am weak-tight, so I don't even play Ac8s in middle position, but fearless JLBSox raises it up at the final table of the AIPS Main Event and gets called by the button (Zerkaboid). The flop is 2h 5h 3d and our hero's continuation bet is met with a min-raise. Me, I'm done, but JLB thinks his opponent has nothing and calls. Turn is 2s and JLB bets big. Zerk raises all-in, putting in his last 965 chips, and JLB says, "I figure I'm crushed when he moves in." Turns out Zerk has Ah6h. River comes 9d and our hero wins a 76K pot with deuces, A-8 kicker. These guys are good.

NEXT WEEK'S SHOW

We interview Martha Frankel, author of Hats and Eyeglasses, a memoir on gambling addiction. And change the keys to the studio so Chris can't get in.

- MIKE

Full Tilt photo

One Minute Mystery: The Case of the Fast Moving Truck

Falk_peter_columboIt's early in a no-limit Texas hold'em tournament.

It folds around to us in the cutoff, and we raise 3x with Ks-Qs.

It's folded around to the small blind, who reraises 3x. We call.

The flop: Js-8d-As.

Small blind bets 875 into the pot of 1575 - about 20 percent of our stack.

What's our play?

Heads-Up bracket, baby!

Gambit has created a bracket for the National Heads-Up Poker Championship, which begins in just a few hours (1 p.m. Eastern). You have to have your entries in before play begins!

Click here to play.

Blow off lunch today and register to play. And then later today, get a report from the field as Michael Craig is our guest - and he's covering the event for FullTilt.

- SCOTT

February 27, 2008

How much would you raise?

Here's a 10-second mystery of the day:

In a $1/$2 no-limit hold'em game at Derby Lane ($100 min/max buy-in). I have $98 after folding my big blind on my first hand. (In that hand, five people called an $11 early position raise).

No other read on the table, other than lots of above-buy-in stacks, and some stereotyping that leads me to believe the table is heavy on solid, laggy players.

On second hand, I'm dealt two black Aces in the small blind. Five callers to me. How much do you raise?

- SCOTT

February 26, 2008

How'd you get your screen name?

Every so often, we get an e-mail from a listener suggesting we do a show on online screen names - some of the best ones, the worst ones, the ones that make you LOL as you're saying NH.

And even just the names you're curious about where they came from.

We'd said this on the show before, but here's where the Ante Up brass got their names:

OffDeadline (Scott): A reference to his newspaper job - when he's off deadline, it's fun time.

willhopper (Chris): The main character in a novel he wrote. (And it's still a secret what his screen name is on Poker Stars. I was hoping he'd still be hopped up on surgery drugs so he'd let it slip when Fasso and I visited him at the hospital last night, but no dice. BTW, he's doing fine and will be released soon. We passed along the well-wishes of The Nation).

stpetebeach (Fasso): City where he lives. The city where he sleeps.

columbo (Columbo): It's his name. Well, er, his fake name.

How did you decide on your name, and what are some of the best you've seen?

- SCOTT

February 22, 2008

Episode #141: Poker Moment of Truth

Tv_moment_of_truth_nyet301

Fox

MAIN TOPIC

Fox's newest game show, The Moment of Truth, inspired us to dig deep into our poker souls and expose our darkest card-playing secrets - while trying to bluff each other. Fasso is the host for this revealing look. Click here to listen to the show.

OTHER TOPICS

He flopped quads! Fasso, famous for saying he's never flopped quads IN HIS LIFE, does so not once, but twice in one week. And neither time was online, you conspiracy theorists!

AIPS recap: Well, not so much, since we had to tape in advance of the big event. But if you're reading this post, then you know who won because you read the previous post, right?

674739Scott's Rant o' the Week: Folks, wash your hands when you're in a dirty poker room. Your mom never showed you how? This Times file photo gives you a clue. (You'll also be happy to learn that most restrooms stock free soap.)

Annette, we want you ... to be on our show. But it hasn't been easy to book the European teen phenom Annette Obrestad.

SpadeClub launches: CardPlayer gets into the monthly membership poker site business. Just imagine the competition we'll have if the federal government decides to regulate online poker.

Hotline: SickBrain submits some musical possibilities, and Chicago Jason has some fun with Fasso and a former guest.

Tampa Bay Poker Replay: Scott says the small difference between a $2/$4 Omaha 8 game and a $3/$5 Omaha 8 game can be significant here in Tampa Bay, Land of Everyone to the Flop.

One Minute Mystery: We decide to fold, and are relieved when our opponent turns over his pocket rockets. Dodged that one.

HAND OF THE WEEK

Ross from Indiana is fond of Stud 8, but is working on his Stud game in order to round out his HORSE abilities (you're a winner already, Ross). He submits this stud hand for our analysis:

He starts out rolled up with Queens, with two Aces on board. He slow plays on 3rd Street, and doesn't need to get frisky as it's completed, raised and reraised by other players.

On 4th Street, he continues the ruse, just calling the single bet.

On 5th Street, danger lurks its ugly head. A pair of 9s with an Ace bets out, and our hero raises. A player with three to a flush sticks around, and we're reraised and then cap it.

On 6th Street, our hero boats up, and he drives the action. He's raised by the now-fourth diamond, and reraised by the 9s, and Ross caps it.

On 7th, Ross quads his queens, raises and caps it after it's reraised.

And then heartbreak: He loses to a steel wheel.

NEXT WEEK'S SHOW

TBD.

- SCOTT

Author Martha Frankel booked for Episode #143

41to8j9zf2bl__ss500_Martha Frankel, author of the new book Hats & Eyeglasses, will be our guest on Episode #143 on March 7.

Martha's book chronicles her fascination with poker, starting with a Wednesday poker game, then moving on to online poker (back in the dial-up days!) and her eventual realization of how much the game had consumed of her life.

An advance copy of the book is en route to Fasso and me, but the reviews I've read make me believe we all can learn from Martha's journey.

Interestingly, her nephew Scott is a member of the Ante Up Nation and played in last night's AIPS event.

- SCOTT

AIPS III, Event #2 Champion: NewtSkins

Congratulations to NewtSkins, who wins the second AIPS III banana as champion of the Stud event, which drew a healthy 110 entrants.

NewtSkins won the last hand against engstrok with three 9s over engstrok's sixes-and-deuces. Congrats to everyone who made the final table!

Just-for-recognition bounties go to:

  • decks613 (Columbo "columbo" 33rd place)
  • Chappy99 (Scott "OffDeadline" 50th place)
  • imtoomuch4u (Fasso "stpetebeach" 89th place)
  • Chris "willhopper" DNP (listed as "out" on the injury report)

NEXT EVENT: No-Limit Hold'em, Thursday, March 27, 9 p.m. Eastern

Click here for the Player of the Year standings. (Special thanks to Ante Up! scorekeeper Gambit for compiling them and Blazman for hosting the results).

Click here for the schedule and all the info on AIPS III events. We'll update it as we set dates for future events, and recognize champions. (This link is also permanently posted on the right-hand side of the blog with all the other important links).

- SCOTT

February 21, 2008

Chris doing well

Just a quick note to let everyone know that I just heard from Chris' wife. His surgery appears to have gone well. I know he appreciates everyone's kind thoughts, and I know he's looking forward to getting back to Ante Up! as soon as possible.

- SCOTT

Michael Craig booked for Episode #142: Heads-Up Play

It's Mike Fasso's first time in the host chair in a couple of weeks (while Chris recuperates from his surgery), so I asked him, "What topic do you want to do?" If you're a regular listener, you know Fasso has been smitten with Michael Craig's limit hold'em heads-up SNG play of late, so it didn't surprise me when Fasso said, "How about heads-up play?"

Well, we did a heads-up show a long ways back, but as with the pot odds show, there's always room to do it better the second time around. And why not ask Michael Craig to come back to help us out?

He's on board - and even better - it'll be the first day of NBC's National Heads-Up Poker Championship, which Craig is covering for FullTilt, so hopefully we'll get some insight on upcoming matches.

Have a heads-up question for either of the Mikes or me? Post it here or e-mail it to us.

And remember, Episode #141 is in the can, and will be uploaded Friday morning. It's a good one - our own version of The Moment of Truth, hosting by Fasso.

- SCOTT

February 19, 2008

AIPS III, Event #3, now open for registration

AIPS III Event #3 (No-Limit Hold'em) has been created and is now open for registration.

And a reminder that Thursday night is Event #2 (Stud).

Click here for all the details on the Ante Up! Intercontinental Poker Series.

- SCOTT

February 18, 2008

Poker Haiku Fun

Have you ever written a Haiku? If you don't know what one is click here. It's a kind of poetry that generally sticks to the 3-line, 17-syllable structure of 5-7-5 (i.e. the first line of the "poem" has five syllables, the second has seven and the last line has five again). The other day at work we wrote Haikus for a funny Girl Scout Cookies story that will run in tbt* this week. But it got me to thinking about poker Haikus. I thought the Ante Up! Nation might want to participate as their daily timewaster.

Here are two to get you started, and feel free to post yours in the comments if you'd like.

Oh Stud/8 poker,
Ye mock me with three babies,
Then brick, brick, brick, brick.

or

No Limit Hold 'Em,
It takes a moment to learn,
Lifetime to master.

-- Chris

February 15, 2008

Episode #140: Poker Night Food

Keeler

Times photo

MAIN TOPIC

Times food editor Janet Keeler joins us to offer some tips on how we can bag those stale old chips and bland pretzels at our home poker games and feature tastier fare for the fish who swim in our pond. Click here to listen to the show.

Some highlights: Nothing wet or sticky (think finger sandwiches), stuff that can be eaten in a bite or two, a good variety (not just junk food), salt slows you down (not good for marathon games) and bring out the grub in stages (great for marathon games). Ante Upper David (aces88ss) offers this tip: players in his game must give $10 to the host, who's responsible for putting out a killer spread (think ribs, salmon, smoked turkey, deer, pheasant - even heart of bear!).

Two recipes from Janet's kitchen:

Smoky Bacon Wraps
1 pound sliced bacon
1 (16 ounce) package miniature smoked sausage links
1 cup packed brown sugar

Cut each bacon strip in half widthwise. Wrap one piece of bacon around each sausage.

Place in a foil-lined 15-in. x 10-in. x 1-in. baking pan. Sprinkle with brown sugar. Bake, uncovered, at 400 degrees for 30-40 minutes or until bacon is crisp and sausage is heated through.

Source. www.allrecipes.com

Fumbo (Faux-Gumbo)2-3 tablespoons olive oil
2-3 cups cooked chicken , cut into bite-sized pieces
1-2 cup cooked white rice
1 (14 ounce) can diced tomatoes

6 cups chicken broth
1 green pepper , diced
1 red pepper , diced
1 medium onion , diced
3 garlic cloves , minced
2 stalks celery , diced
1 potato , diced (yukon gold or red)
to taste cayenne pepper
to taste salt & pepper , to taste
1 tablespoon sugar

Saute onion, peppers and celery for 3 minutes.  Add garlic and sautee 1 more minute.  Pour in diced tomatoes, chicken broth and potatoes. Stir, bring to a low boil, then reduce heat and let simmer for 30 minutes.

Add chicken, rice, cayenne pepper (the amount you use depends on your family's tolerance for spicy food - I usually give about 4 dashes), salt & pepper and sugar.  Let cook for another 20-30 minutes to bring flavors together.

Serves 6.

OTHER TOPICS

Oj_simpson_jail_la102O.J.'s poker game delayed: The Naked Gun star was supposed to host a poker game on a January night ... until he was hauled off to Vegas by a former bailbondsman. Here's the Associated Press image from Jail, the TV show that reported it.

Best damn ... Poker Show on TV? That's what this Phill Hellmuth vs. Annie Duke reality poker show claims to be. Chris isn't buying it, Scott isn't watching it.

Big money in membership sites: PurePlay is offering a $10,000 tournament.

AIPS reminder: It's Thursday night on FullTilt. Click here for details.

Hotline: We get a call from Middle America about how much luck is involved in poker. Short term? Lots. Long term? Not so much.

Tampa Bay Poker Replay: Poker room receipts are were up 54 percent in December. The new stakes are attracting players!

HAND OF THE WEEK
Russ (Vindice) submits a hand from a recent No-Limit Hold'em CHIMPS event.

Stakes are 200/400 with a 50 ante.

UTG calls, and Russ calls with Kd-Qc. Two callers, plus the BB, so five to the flop.

The flop: Js-Jh-Ks.

It's checked around to our hero, who bets 1200. Folded around to the UTG, who calls.

The turn: 7d.

Checked around.

The river: 2c.

UTG bets 3000, our hero pushes for 4709 and loses to a boat (pocket Kings).

Our advice: The two Jacks on the flop were scary, and there wasn't a reason to push the final 1709 in on the end.

Better luck next time Russ. Send us your address for some swag.

NEXT WEEK'S SHOW

It's a good one: Fasso joins us to moderate our own version of The Moment of Truth. The show has already been taped, in anticipation of Chris' surgery. He'll be out for up to a month. Fasso will fill in, and wish our good buddy a speedy recovery.

- SCOTT

One Minute Mystery: The Case of the Invisible Man

Falk_peter_columboWe're in Level 2 of a four-table no-limit hold'em six-handed tournament.

The UTG player raises 4x and we call with A-K. Cutoff and button call as well.

The flop: A-6-3.

The UTG bets one big bet. We raise to almost pot, which scares off the cutoff and button. But the UTG now reraises half of his stack.

What do we do?

Times file photo

February 14, 2008

A tale of two hands

Last night was our home game at Fasso's. All night I was up a little or right around even. I hadn't had a losing session in the Ante Up! games in a LONG time, and Fasso and I had been talking about that fact this week. So, of course, I was bound to walk away with less than I started this time around, right?

It's amazing how two hands can change a session so drastically. It was the end of the night, the final 30 minutes, and we had two "dealer's choice" games left. Frank called Deuce-to-7 and early on in the big blind I picked up 2-3-5-x-x. Fasso raised UTG and we had two callers so I called. I drew 6-7. Stood pat, bet out and got two callers. Second draw I stood pat, Fasso took two and Frank took one. I bet out, Fasso folded and Frank raised me. I three-bet it and he just called. So when he called I felt good because if he had a wheel he would've capped it. We both stood pat and for some reason I thought against betting and checked, and he checked behind me so I was positive I had the best hand. He turned over 76432. I was pipped for a pretty large pot. So that brought me back to even on the night.

The other hand came in the final game of the night. I called NLHE. It was the first time this game had been called at Fasso's in two weeks. About five hands in Fasso raised 3X UTG. We were 5-handed at this point and the blinds were $.50-$1 with a $30 cap. It folded around to me in the BB and I looked down at JJ. I reraised to $12 and he instantly said "Cap it!!!!" So, he re-reraised me to $30. I had to call since I already had $12 in there and I had a feeling I was up against AK. I called and he turned over AQ. The flop was safe for me (it had a king and nothing else) but he turned a queen and that was all she wrote. I ended the night down $30.

The Deuce-to-7 hand sucked, but there was no other way for me to play it so that's just the way it goes. But the NLHE hand has me second-guessing (Isn't that always the way in NLHE?). Should I have just called there and led out on the flop? Hindsight says yes because I know his cards, etc., but then again I might've been afraid of the king and checked. I could've gotten away from it for just $3 if I only called his raise. Oh well. I hate hindsight. Then again, I didn't like the way Fasso played it either. He committed $27 more dollars on AQ. I know he was frustrated at that point, and that led to me calling, but to put all your money in on AQ in a cash game is pretty weak. Sorry, Fasso, but it's true. This wasn't a $5 heads-up Chimps tournament. 8-)

Still, playing for four hours and only losing a little isn't too bad considering I took over $100 out of that game last week.

-- Chris

February 13, 2008

This must be what Bear meant

I had an hour to kill this morning before work and sat down to play $1-2 Stud/8 on Stars. On the first hand I was "seated" to the right of the bring-in (a deuce) with [K,K] 3. We had JUST talked about this on the forum and how I almost always fold these hands because I'm tired of losing money to low draws hitting their buried ace or backing into a straight or flush. But I kept hearing the Bear roar in my ear, so I played it.

The deuce brought it in and there were players going low (like two or so) and then there was a queen doorcard behind me that limped as well. So I just called because I was last to act and there was NO WAY I would get anyone to fold now. Was that a mistake?

My fourth card was a 4 and the deuce picked up an 8. The other lows bricked and the Q picked up a 6. Now I decided to bet when it got checked to me to make the low draws have to pay and to force the queen to call with the second-best hand. It was a perfect card for me really because it looked like I was going low and I could use that to my advantage. I got two callers: the Q6 and the 28.

Still no aces out, but that changed on 5th when I picked up an ace for a board of [K,K] 3-4-A. A GREAT CARD FOR ME!! The Q6 got a J and the 28 got a 6. I have the best hand showing now and it REALLY looks like I'm going low. So I bet out to force the only low draw out, and it worked like a charm. He folded and the Q6J, thinking I'm going low, called. I picked up a 7 and he bricked with a 3. So I bet and he called. The river completed a 7 low for me with a 5. I bet and he called. My high hand held up and of course I won the low. I checked the muck and all he had was a pair of queens with no other draw.

I assume this is what Barry Greentstein meant when he talked about punishing the drawing low hands and the players who play split queens. I won a nice $12 pot because I had the perfect deceptive hand that backed into a low. Even if I didn't have buried kings the QJ63 hand could have thought I paired the ace. Anyway, I gave a little back but still secured a small profit before logging off. It was a nice hand to start off my day.

Did I make any mistakes here?

-- Chris

P.S. All Hail The Bard, who won the CHIMPS Heads-Up tournament last night on Stars. Nice job, Lance.

February 12, 2008

Favorite game du jour

When I first started playing poker with enthusiasm in 2003 I was a NLHE tournament guy. But Ante Up!, combined with Scott and Fasso's influences have changed me. I enjoy all of the games now (except Omaha/8, and that's just because I hate it, not because I can't play it) and have become a better poker player for it. Why? Strategies in one game sometimes make me think differently in another. For instance, my Stud game has improved tremendously because of my Stud/8 play. In Stud/8 I latched on to a great tip from Mr. Chip Reese (R.I.P.) when he said, "Just play for the low." Now, what he meant was focus on a quality low starting hand (i.e. A23 suited) and go from there. You might back into a high hand and scoop. To someone playing only NLHE for the longest time, this concept had eluded me. But once I knew what he meant and then read Todd Brunson's most excellent SuperSystem 2 chapter on the game, I was hooked. But I still didn't enjoy regular Stud because it was too difficult. Too many cards, too much deception. At least in Stud/8 I could grasp a concept and stick to it while I learned. Now, by playing Stud/8 so much I have a feel for Stud unlike ever before. Same with Razz. Even though it's an easy game, you still have to keep track of cards, etc. and this only helps my other games.

So as I learned these new games and came to appreciate them, they started to inch their way toward the top of my list. The first to edge out NLHE for me was Razz. It was so simple, and with so many bets the pots were huge. We started a slogan, "Let's Play Razz" (I still wear my LPR buttons on my lanyard to this day) and introduced thousands to this game. It's one of the proudest moments of my Ante Up! tenure.

But after a while I found Omaha. Not O8B (I don't think I'll ever make that game my fave), but limit Omaha and PLO won me a lot of money early on, and it edged out Razz. But that was a quick moment atop my favorite list because soon after I heard the tip from Mr. Reese and that changed everything. Stud/8 has been my favorite game for more than a year now, and it's the first game I check when I sit down to play online. Also, if no one has called it in the home game by the time it's my turn I always call it.

Why am I posting this? Because Deuce-to-Seven Triple Draw Lowball (a.k.a. Kansas City Lowball) is trying to kick the door down! There's something about the game that's really starting to get to me. It has the frustration of Razz, the betting structure of Limit Hold 'em, three times the action of 5-card draw, the pot sizes of NLHE and a betting predictability unlike any other game. Last night I played on Stars and could easily tell exactly how the betting was going to go. "He'll check, he'll call, he'll fold. He'll stand pat, he'll draw 2 and he'll draw 1." It's like clockwork. When I first started playing this game my bankroll really ballooned, and since then I have only had two losing sessions in the game vs. about a dozen winning ones. It can be frustrating, even more so than Razz sometimes, but it can really pay you off handsomely, too. Watch out Stud/8!

Are you playing different games than when you first started playing poker? Has your favorite game changed through the years, or are you still into the first game that got you hooked? Don't get me wrong, I still love NLHE cash games, and it's my bread and butter when I'm having a bad session elsewhere. But other games really have made their way into my heart and if you aren't playing other games you are really missing out.

-- Chris

February 11, 2008

Another interesting hand

I've been feeling pretty good about my play as of late, though I did have a horrible session Friday night in $2-4 Stud/8 on PokerStars. One hand saw me make an ace-high flush and a 7-5 low only to lose to a boat for the high and a 6-5 for the low. That hand really hurt. I kept making the second-best hand (and they were big hands) both ways and it cost me my whole $80 buy-in.

When I feel like things aren't going my way in a particular game I like to change disciplines, usually going far away from that game. In this case I chose to play $1-2 NLHE. I've been getting into a rhythm lately with NLHE, and I got involved in a hand almost immediately after I left the Stud/8 table. I was a little on tilt and probably should've gotten away from it (I'll let you decide), but I didn't, and here it is:

It's only the third hand for me and there are some big stacks at this short-handed NLHE table. At least two players have more than $400, another had more than $300 and everyone else had about $200, which was what I bought in for, the max of $200. I always sit down in the BB, and I surrendered to back-to-back $8 raises from the guy immediately to my right to start the session. My first hand on the button I was dealt A♠K with $197 in my stack. When everyone folded around to me I knew when I made it $8 someone would defend thinking it looked like I just wanted to get my blinds back while in position. The SB folded and sure enough the BB called.

Flop: 39♠ 9♣ rainbow. He checked to me and I made my c-bet of $10 into a pot of about $16 after rake. He check-raised me to $25. At this point I thought, "The best part about AK is I can get away from it after a missed flop. But as I was about to click FOLD, I thought, "It's only $15 more and if he REALLY had a nine would he check-raise me, which is so Level 1?" So I figured he had a middle pair or nothing. Was I wrong to call here? I really don't know. I knew I had position and if he showed any weakness on fourth I would pounce.

Fourth street: A♣. I was planning on bluffing the turn, but now I had top-top. If my read was correct I had him crushed. He bet about $41 into a $65 pot. I considered raising here for info, but I really felt I had him beat, and if he had what I thought (I was thinking 55 or 66) then I hoped he would try to bluff on the end as well. So I just called again. There were no real draws (clubs and a wheel are possible on the next street, but I can't always be afraid of monsters, right?) so I wasn't afraid of a suckout.

The river: 2. Now he put me all-in for my remaining $123. The pot swelled to about $270 after rake. I have to admit, if this was a tournament I might fold. But the bets felt really suspicious. There were no draws right from the beginning, and yet it felt like he wanted me out of this pot so badly. No flush got there, only 4-5 would make a straight and there's no way he had that. If he had a 9 wouldn't he want to make a bet that would be easy for me to call with aces? It was a lot of pressure, and it really didn't feel like those "overbets with the nuts" you see from microtlimit donktards. All I could feel in my heart was this guy didn't want me in the hand with him, and it felt like desperation. So I called.

As a lot of you have pointed out, I have matured in my postings as of late, and handled bad beats or cold decks a little better than in posts past. So, I ask you, what did he have? I will reveal the hand soon, it will not be a hand for the show, so no suspense.

-- Chris

February 09, 2008

World Champions Week

Match24table
After about a two-week hiatus Poker After Dark will be back on Monday with World Champions Week. Phil Hellmuth has been on fire this season, winning two PAD titles. Can Hellmuth, who won the WSOP Main Event in 1989 by beating Johnny Chan (denying him three straight with 99 on the final hand) make it three? Can Chan exact some small revenge and end Hellmuth's streak? Hellmuth and Chan (1987, 1988) will battle Chris “Jesus” Ferguson (2000), Berry Johnston (1986), Jamie Gold (2006) and Huck Seed (1996) in the winner-take-all match. These champions have accumulated 36 WSOP bracelets and won lifetime tournament winnings in excess of $41 million. Just in case some of you may not know who Berry Johnston is (are you kidding me?) here is a link to his Hendon Mob page. Man's got game people. Players shouldn't have to be NLHE tournament punks for you to know who they are.
-- Chris

Photo courtesy of NBC

February 08, 2008

Episode #139: Sen. Alfonse D'Amato of the PPA

MAIN TOPIC

133514Former U.S. Sen. Alfonse D'Amato joins us to chat one year after taking over at his new gig: chairman of the Poker Players Alliance, a grass-roots lobbying group that works to promote poker-friendly legislation.

We asked the senator about the PPA's agenda, how the federal government really works, poker sentiment at the federal level, the presidential candidates, 2+2 Forum's criticism of the PPA and much more. Click here to listen to the show.

Associated Press

OTHER TOPICS

Dcp_0597Mourn the passing of ... Chris' blue and green shirt, that pretty much was his Ante Up! uniform, his work uniform, and - rumors say - his wedding tuxedo. He's been hitting the potato chips hard lately, went to reach for a Pizza-flavored Pringle and split the shirt. The best part? Someone stole it out of this trash can. (Was it Blazman?) Some people are really sick. And so is the person who stole the shirt (unless it WAS Blazman. He's cool).

Chris_shows_offHome game report: When you get as old as we are, strange things happen when you decide to have a home game that stretches past midnight on a school night. How much does it hurt when you misread your hand? Ugh. Kids, when you get tired, just walk away. Chris did a new chip trick: He made his shirt disappear.

Dcp_0603Stimulate the poker economy: Congress is sending us each $600 - even more if you have ankle-biters around the house. Are you spending your rebate on poker? Yeah, we know you are. Maybe Chris' BFF Freddy Deeb will buy Chris a new shirt.

Macau gets hold'em: The craze finally makes it to the Chinese gambling mecca in a live-game form. Four tables are planned initially. Might want to get your name on the wait list ASAP.

Brunson blogs: I highly recommend taking at look at Doyle Brunson's blog. It's a bittersweet mix of personal torment and great poker stories.

Hotline: The FullTilt RCG gives us another ring. You just have to feel bad for it.

Tampa Bay Poker Replay: The Hard Rock is introducing NASCAR collector chips and is advertising a $77,777 bad beat jackpot for hold'em ($7,777 for cool kids like us who prefer Omaha or stud). Over at The Silks at Tampa Bay Downs, compete in the Tampa Bay Poker Challenge for your share of $100,000 in cash. Plus, new non-hold'em tournaments once a month and tableside massages!

Dcp_0604One Minute Mystery: We decide to slow down on the scary turn, and then check down the river which proves to be a mistake. Our opponent takes the pot with 9-9. Next week's mystery? Did Amarillo Slim Dumpster Dive for Chris' shirt?

HAND OF THE WEEK

We pick apart a no-limit hold'em cash game hand that Chris previously posted on this blog - a post that drew more than 60 comments. (You guys really should quit indulging him). Turns out, Chris gets felted by 9d-6d - a most unlikely holding. While there's probably not a lot Chris could have done to avoid his fate, I said I would have checked the flop with the intention to check-raise. Same result, different path.

NEXT WEEK'S SHOW

Fasso returns to moderate our own version of The Moment of Truth, Fox's new game show where it pays to tell the truth. Who can outbluff the other more - Chris or me? E-mail your suggested questions to Mike.

And on Episode #140, we'll welcome Times food editor Janet Keeler to the show to suggest some better food than those stale chips and pretzels that all of us serve at our home games. E-mail your suggested questions to us.

- SCOTT

February 07, 2008

Lance's home game recap

Last night we played in Fasso's home game, or as I like to call it: Gambit's Home Game South, because the table and chips were Gambit's and he was there as well. It was the first time we played at Fasso's in about two years. It's the location of his infamous blowup the last time we played there. I had bluffed him off his pocket kings with my pocket 10s when a board flopped with an ace. After that we referred to him as Lance when we talked about the incident on the show to protect his identity. So much for that.

It was good to get back to Lance's place. But whenever we play our home game, I never know if I should post because we might want to talk about it on the show. Plus, this is Scott and Fasso's blog, too, so they may have something they want to say, etc. But just in case the cat has their tongue, I'll mention last night's boxscore.

First, some of the funnier lines from the evening, and I may be paraphrasing:

After a hand when Fasso missed a value bet:
Steve: I always bet my hands strongly so you could've gotten another bet out of me.
Fasso: I'll file that away for future use.
Chris: Yeah, but Fasso's in his 40s so there's a good chance he'll forget it anyway.

After Scott bled a bunch of chips making very loose calls with just overcards during a limit hold 'em session.
Chris: You know they say you have to have a healthy disregard for money to successfully play poker ... So Scott's gonna live a long healthy life!

With the Duke-UNC game on behind us, Frank, a Dookie grad, was just a little eager:
Frank: We will be No. 2 tomorrow. (2 minutes later) We're gonna be No. 2 tomorrow. (a minute later) With this win we'll be No. 2 tomorrow. (20 seconds later) This is a fight for No. 2 in the country and we're gonna be no worse than No. 2.
Chris: Frank, if you say they're going to be No. 2 one more time I'm going to smack you. It's only friggin February, and you're already No. 2 anyway! Would you shut the hell up?!
Scott: I think Duke will be No. 2 tomorrow if they win.
Chris: Shut up, Scott.

In Razz, Fasso and I get involved in a hand and this is on 6th street:
Chris: I got you.
Fasso: I have a hand.
Chris: Good, so do I. Call, fold or raise.
Fasso: I'm thinking we might have another Binions moment here.
It turns out he was right. He made a better 7-6 than me, just like at Binions, but I think Mike would say I finally was gracious, right Mike? Nice hand, buddy.

Last hand of the night, and it's Crazy Pineapple:
Chris: I'm gonna have to pay you off Mike, I have a flush.
Fasso: You have a flush, but I have THE flush.
He turns over the nuts and that hand makes him positive on the evening.

As for the game, I had a nice session, getting ahead by about $50 early, then falling back to about even and then turning it on again for a nice $106 profit. And we never called No Limit. Gambit had a nice night, and he had my number. Seemed like every pot I was in with him I lost, and he even beat my queen with a one-card pull of the deck for a king to win the extra dollar. Wow!

There was one hand I was particuliarly proud of in Stud/8, and it has to do with perception and a scary board. I was dealt (A,3) 3 and I was the bring-in. This hand had possibilities, though I might be tempted to fold if I wasn't the bring-in and there were a lot of low cards out. But my ace kicker was higher than any card showing. So I just brought it in for $.50. Steve and Fasso called and then Gambit completed to $2 with something like a 6 showing. Frank folded and I had to call. Steve (10 showing) and Fasso (J♠) also came along.

On fourth street I picked up a 7, which made my hand pretty powerful as far as draws go, but I still really only had a pair of threes. Gambit picked up another baby (a 4 I think) and Steve looked to have missed with something like a 6. Fasso pick up an 8, nothing scary. Everyone checked to Gambit, who bet $2. We all called.

On 5th I got a 9, which did nothing for me. Gambit picked up an A♠, Steve paired his 6, I think, and Fasso paired his 8, but neither pairs were door cards so I didn't think they had trips. Again it was checked to Gambit, who bet $4. I called with my draws and so did Steve and Fasso.

Now it gets interesting. I got the 9 on 6th street. So I had two nines showing, 4 diamonds and an ace in the hole. But my low was busted. I didn't think I'd win the low even if I caught good anyway because Gambit again hit a low card, like a deuce, and the spades were starting to add up on his board. I knew if I checked then Steve and Fasso would follow suit just like they had done on the previous streets, checking to the low. So I checked my hand and it got around to Gambit, who bet like clockwork. At this point I sprung into action and raised to $8. Steve thought it over, and he was having a very frustrating night, making the second-best hand a LOT, so I took advantage of that. My raise finally got him out, but he let out a very big sigh of disgust. Fasso thought and then put out $4. I said, "I made it $8." He pulled back his bet (it's a friendly game and we let others do that all night when it was clear they were confused) and said, "Oh, I thought I had bet out first and was just calling $4 more." Then he thought forever and Gambit, thinking Fasso had folded, reraised out of turn. This almost brought out "Lance," but Fasso kept cool and said he didn't act yet. By Gambit doing that it really rattled Fasso and made him think. Gambit was physically upset by his blunder, and it tipped his hand. Fasso knew he ultimately would have to likely call 3-4 big bets now instead of just two. That's when he started to think my nines were trips and Gambit had a locked low, so he finally folded. Gambit reraised and I just called.

I filled up on the river with a 3 and Gambit just had his low as we split a nice pot. When I showed my hand Steve said he folded 10s-up and Fasso said he folded Kings-up but he feared I had trips and would need to fill up to win. Now, if you think about it, if I hadn't forced out Fasso I might've gotten more money out of him because I filled up (I was ahead of him in the dealing sequence so it wasn't disturbed) and when Gambit bet I would've made it $8 (or I would have bet out first, got Fasso to call and then Gambit would raise and I would reraise). Who knows what would've happened after that, and Fasso would have missed on 7th. The other side of that coin is, if I just called on 6th, Steve and Fasso both would've stayed in and THEN either one of them could've filled up and beaten my boat. So it works both ways, but it was nice to know I made TWO better hands lay down because of my two-betting with those scary nines showing. This play doesn't work in microlimit online poker, so don't try it.

Would you have played it that way? What if you were in Fasso's shoes with Kings-up there?

-- Chris

February 06, 2008

How would you play this hand?

I noticed someone on the forum had said they missed the forum posts asking for hand analysis. I had a hand last night on PokerStars I'd like people to weigh-in on, if that's okay. I'd put it on the forum but we could use the hits. A man has to eat.

It's NLHE, the blinds are $.50-$1. I have about $60 after buying in for $80. I tried a bluff earlier and it didn't work, but I got to show it down for advertising purposes. But that bluff cost me most of that $20 I was down. At this point I made the decision to loosen up a little more. It's short-handed and the stacks are all about the same, from $110 to about $75. No one has been real aggressive or out of line so I took this as my opportunity to play a few more hands. UTG limped and I had 87. So I limped. The player to my left raised to $3. The blinds folded and so did the UTG raiser. I decided to gamble and call. Some would say this is a bad play because I'm out of position and I'm basically playing a drawing hand. I probably agree with that, but at this point I'm down and looking to hit a big hand. I'm not in this to draw to a straight, I want to flop two pair or a flush draw.

Since the table was relatively tight I put this guy on a range of hands that included large cards or a big/decent pair. I didn't put him on a small pair because the raise didn't really feel like it was enough to drive out the other players. But I couldn't rule it out either. So we're heads-up for a pot of about $8. He has me covered with about $105.

Flop: AKQ

I flopped a flush. I give it a little thought, but not much. I figure he has to have hit that, and I'm hoping he has AK or AQ. So I bet about the size of the pot, $7, trying to make him think I was betting to protect my hand against a four-card flush. But he raised me to $25. I wasn't sure what to make of this. Does he have what I hope he has and is protecting his hand against someone holding say, J10? Or does he have AJ or JJand is betting his pair and draw? Protecting or drawing? When I replayed the hand in my mind (as quickly as I could) I put him on high cards and felt he was protecting. I already had my flush so I wasn't going anywhere.

Should I have called here or raised? Would you consider folding?

In the end I shoved. If I were to just call and a diamond peeled off I would have to fold, plus, a call would leave me with just $32. If a diamond didn't fall on the turn there's no bet I could fold to really, so I shoved and put the pressure on him.

Did I double through or did I bust out? And what did he have? I'll post the answer after enough people have a chance to weigh-in.

-- Chris

February 05, 2008

A deuce-to-7 oddity, or was it?

Like a lot of poker players out there, I got my start playing cards with my dad. We used to play games such as "Steal the Old Man's Pack" and "Go Fish" before moving on to 5-card draw and 7-card stud. Of course I had no idea at the age of 4 how to strategically play these last two games (much like today), but it was those early bonding days with him that forged my love for competition. So whenever we get together we always end up playing cards, and last week we played a few Deuce-to-7 tournaments with my mom. It was just three-handed and nothing monetary was on the line, just chips and pride.

Anyway, we played for a few hours, and there was one stretch where all three of us simultaneously made sevens at least four or five times at showdown. And, in addition to these amazing hands, there were a handful of times where a 7-6 would be beaten by a 7-5 during a heads-up showdown. I know a LOT of people are going to make their snide remarks about RCGs, etc., so go ahead, get them out of the way. I'll be over here waiting for you to stop. ... Got it out of your system? Okay, let's move on.

Here's the reason for the post: Would you consider this to be the norm? We often play this in our home game with about six players, and making a 7 is a very rare occurrence. Yet, when we played three-handed the other night, a 7 or an 8 was almost always needed to win the pot. Do you feel this is because there are more cards left in the deck? Is it because my parents don't know the deeper strategy behind this game and would draw 4 or 5 to start so it was an unconventional way of playing?

Statistically, can this anomaly challenge the odds charts, or at least put a twist on the unseen-cards theories? For instance, we have to assume there are four 7s left in the deck when we start with 2-3-4-5. But when you're playing with six players, there are 30 cards out already, as opposed to the paltry 15 dealt to start a three-handed contest. If you end up playing vs. four players in the first scenario, you can't assume a 7 is in their hands, but doesn't one almost have to be? Yet three-handed, this seems less likely.

Do you adjust your game for this short-handed situation? It clearly wasn't like Hold 'Em where starting hand values go way up when you're short-handed. I needed the nuts or very close to it to win the other night, and yet we have guys taking down huge pots making 8s and 9s at the home game.

Am I just insane and this was an odd thing, or does playing short-handed increase your chances of making a 7 in Deuce-to-7?

-- Chris

February 04, 2008

Heads-up session and a floater who sank

I really don't know what possessed me to do this (Blazman put a spell on me?) but Saturday night (actually Sunday morning) I decided to play No Limit Hold 'Em heads up at a cash table. I have to admit I've played heads up very successfully before, but almost exclusively in a SNG format, not for cash. My success EASILY comes from playing heads up with my wife, Jeanne, who's a very good NLHE tournament player. She makes me think about different plays and adjusting every time we play. If you can find someone at home to play heads up with I strongly recommend it.

I intended to join a short-handed table but couldn't find one open to my liking, so I thought "I want to see as many hands as possible and play as quickly as the game would allow since it's 2 a.m." So then I figured what better way to do that than to play heads up?

I found someone alone at a $.25-$.50 table so I joined with $50. We played maybe 10 hands before he scooted with a $3 profit. It was pretty uneventful, but not as uneventful as my next opponent, who left after four hands and a $1 profit. After about 15 hands I was down nearly $5 and had no one sitting across from me. I thought: "Stay and fight you hit-and-run wussies!" Then I saw a guy with $78 waiting for an opponent. It was at the same limit so I bought in for the max, $50, and had an inkling he'd be aggressive. Why? He was up $28 and sitting there waiting for another victim instead of being content to leave with his profit and start anew somewhere else. To me that screamed aggressive player.

From the get-go I was passive, limping on the button and just calling his raises when I had position and a decent starting hand. For about 15 minutes the only winner in this contest was Full Tilt, however. Then the first big hand came up. On the button I had 7-7 and raised to $1.50, which I thought he would respect since I hadn't really raised much at all. That's when he reraised to $6. Now, in my earlier days when I thought I knew how to play poker I would've just shoved there and taken my chances. But now that I'm older and wiser (well, you know what I mean) I decided to just smooth-call his re-raise. This way I could get away from a scary board for just the minimum.

Flop: 9-7-2 rainbow. Wow! He bet $9 instantly. I actually took this as weakness. There was no thought process AT ALL it seemed. If it looks like a c-bet and smells like a c-bet and feels like a c-bet, it's probably a c-bet. But as I was about to slowplay my slot machine a thought popped into my head: "What if he really did respect my raise and reraised with a monster like KK?" I could double through right now if that's the case. So I decided to bet into him. The great Doyle Brunson often professes to bet your sets, especially into a raiser, so I minraised him, hoping he had something and would take this minraise as another passive move on my part, like with A-9. He called.

The turn brought a rag, and since I'm writing at work I can't check the hand history to see what it was. I think it was a 4, but it put two clubs on the board. At this point he shoved! I have to admit I didn't even think for a second what he could have here. I instacalled because there's no way I'm getting away from a set of sevens, especially with the size of that pot in a cash game. Before I tell you what he had I'd like for you to guess. Go ahead, guess. I'll wait.

Does he have AA? 99? Air? Flush draw?

He held AQo and was drawing dead on the river. I doubled through him and then about 10 hands later or so I felted him with QQ. I flopped another set when he had A9 on a board of AQ7.

Davidwilliams But if I replay the 77 vs. AQ hand from the beginning you can see his action adds up, even on the turn. If I'm in his shoes with a hand like AQ I'd consider reraising preflop. I also would consider just calling and seeing a flop since I'm out of position. But he reraised and got a call. Now, when he misses the flop I can see him betting out. He told me preflop he had a big hand by his reraise, especially reraising someone who was a rock till that point. When I minraised, however, I think he has to seriously consider getting away from this hand. But I think Mr. Aggressive planned on stealing this from me all along. In his mind he was "floating," which can be a very powerful tool if you have confidence in your reading ability. If you don't know what floating is, it's when you call a bet with the intention of stealing the pot on a later street if you sense weakness. David Williams (picture by Getty Images), wrote a nice piece on this here. The problem though was my opponenet was "floating" out of position. To properly execute "The Float" you need to know your opponent is weak and can't bet the turn. Then you pounce with a bet. In this case he just panicked, shoved and hoped I only had a marginal hand and believed he actually had an overpair and therefore couldn't call.

I've been using the floating play more lately with some decent success, and if you can do it with outs that's even better. I used the float once last week on Stars with KQ when the board came A-10-x. I called his bet in position intending to steal on the turn, and a jack peeled off. JACKPOT!

Anyway, I'm not sure I'll continue to play heads up, but it was great to make a $65 profit in less than an hour. And remember, don't float out of position.

-- Chris

February 02, 2008

What's on your Poker Happy List?

Okay, a few weeks ago we asked you what was on your Poker Bucket List - poker stuff you want to do before you kick the bucket. I've started to see another kind of list lately - a "happy" list. Had I come up with the idea, I probably would have chosen a less-Disney name (perhaps Euphoria List?), but the thought is what counts: What in poker makes you happy?

Here's my early list:

  • The touch of the felt, the cards, the chips.
  • Just walking into Binion's poker room
  • Juiceless tournaments
  • Goading Chris into saying "Unbelievable!," "Unreal!," "That's sick!," or "dog-and-pony show" during the home game ... or all four.
  • A dealer who takes command of the table
  • Meeting Ante Up listeners
  • Check-raise bluffing ... then hitting that miracle card that helps your hand
  • Jamming the pot in the stud portion of a HORSE tournament against a player who still thinks we're playing razz.
  • Scooping in Omaha 8 or Stud 8
  • Taking down a limit hold'em hand against Fasso with Ace-Napkin.
  • Making a final table
  • Stacking chips after winning a huge pot
  • Being able to play online in the airport while waiting for my Southwest flight to board
  • Cheering for Mike McDermott and the Cincinnati Kid
  • Watching a Matusow or Hellmuth blowup
  • Walking into a casino and seeing a wait list for a game other than hold'em
  • Winning a pot off a guy who misread his hand because he's wearing sunglasses
  • Anticipation of winning an AIPS banana
  • Being dealt Ace-Ace when you're short-stacked and desperate.

What's on your list?

- SCOTT

February 01, 2008

Episode #138: Mailbag!

MAIN TOPIC

Yes, we know we promised Sen. Alfonse D'Amato, but the new chairman of the Poker Players Alliance had to postpone again, this time to stump for Sen. John McCain. We're reskedded for next week. (So keep those questions coming!)

So we present our latest installment of everyone's favorite ace in the hole: Mailbag!

Click here to listen to the show, where you'll hear our answers to questions that delve into adjusting to table changes, restealing, mixed games at home, the differences between tournament play and live play, online etiquette, tournament satellites, variance, the Chimps series, bingo and much, much more.

OTHER TOPICS

Windy City: I recap my fab time in Chicago, and we share some clips from the Ante Up! MeetUp, courtesy of Chicago Mike. Thanks Mike!

Pot odds: Raise your hand if you're surprised that we had an error or two on last week's attempt at pot odds redemption? We try to set the record straight.

It's all about timing: I endured a run of bad timing last night at Derby Lane, but the only timing that counts is the last.

QuickDraw freerolls: Doyle's Room is offering these new tournaments. They're freerolls, but you can rebuy for a juiceless $1. Scott's intrigued, Chris is yawning.

WPT news: The World Poker Tour is now offering Cash Game camps, and our very own Ante Up! superstar Lee Childs is among the faculty. Also, ClubWPT kicks off. It's a membership site where you can play poker and blackjack tournaments for prizes.

Hotline: Mike from California says last week's One Minute Mystery is a common play in online SNGs and Charlie from New York says razz is illegal in New Jersey! True? We'll find out.

Tampa Bay Poker Replay: Why is it so hard to find a live stud tournament that's dealt and structured properly? We review Fasso's debacle at the Hard Rock.

HAND OF THE WEEK

The wait is over for Justin "Irish_Fan_34." We finally break down his hand from a .25/.50 Stud8 table on FullTilt.

He starts with (5d-3s) 6c, raises the bring-in's complete and gets three callers.

On 4th Street, he picks up the 8c, raises and gets reraised by 2c-8s.

On 5th Street, he improves with the Ah, and check/calls. We'd raise here to drive out a player going high so we can get heads-up with the remaining player, who is going low.

On 6th Street, he pairs his 6 with the 6d, bets out, gets raised and reraises. We'd rather have gotten to 7th as cheaply as possible.

On 7th Street, he miffs with a Js, but it's checked down and our hero scoops with his pair of 6s and 8-6 low.

Whew. Nice outcome, but a dangerous path to get there.

Justin, send us your address and we'll ship out some swag.

- SCOTT

One Minute Mystery: The Case of the Cracked Cover

Falk_peter_columboWe're in Level 8 of a multi-table no-limit tournament. Blinds are 200/400 with antes, and we have an average stack of 9,800.

It's folded around to us in the cutoff. We have Ad-7c and raise 3x to steal the blinds/antes.

It's folded to the BB, who calls.

Flop: 10c-Jc-8d.

BB checks, and we take a stab with a bet of 1,400. BB calls.

The turn: 10h.

BB checks. What do we do?

Times file photo

About This Blog

Christopher Cosenza is co-host of the longest running poker podcast on the planet, Ante Up! He started playing poker seriously in 2003 and his favorite players are Phil Ivey and Kenna James, though he tends to act like Phil Hellmuth if you make a bad play against him.

Scott Long, Ante Up!'s other co-host, is the author of the monthly Bet on It column in tbt*. He began gambling way too young (don't tell the fuzz!) and in the seventh grade, named his state "Gambleland" for a school project (State Animal? Loan shark, of course).

E-mail Ante Up: poker@tbt.com
poker@tampabay.com

Listen to the podcast

Ante Up is a weekly podcast you can listen to on a computer or MP3 player.

Or plug this RSS feed onto your computer.

To hear the latest "Ante Up" episode now, click here.

ANTE UP! HOTLINE: Leave us a comment or a voice greeting and we'll use it on the show. Call us toll-free at (866) 371-9605. Local and international listeners can call (727) 824-7742.

Subscribe to / Bookmark this Blog

Advertisement

Buy some gear

Special Video Report