John McCain's mortgage pander
Tampabay.com

Comment Policy

    Please be sure your comments are appropriate before submitting them. Inappropriate comments include content that:
  • Is libelous
  • Is abusive, harassing, or threatening
  • Is obscene, vulgar, or profane
  • Is racially, ethnically or religiously offensive
  • Is illegal or encourages criminal acts
  • Is known to be inaccurate or contains a false attribution
  • Infringes copyrights, trademarks, publicity or any other rights of others
  • Impersonates anyone (actual or fictitious)
  • Solicits funds, goods or services, or advertises
  • The St. Petersburg Times does not edit posts but reserves the right to delete comments that violate our policy.

Countrywide hijinks: Part Two | Main | Pending home sales improve, but South lags »

October 08, 2008

John McCain's mortgage pander

I don't like to get into politics on here, but I couldn't ignore John McCain's vote-buying suck up to home owners in last night's debate.

In an otherwise pretty solid performance, McCain talked about the government refinancing mortgages to reflect declining home values. He claimed he was saving seniors, who, lo and behold, vote in disproportionate numbers.

Leave aside the fact that such government intercession is already part of this summer's housing rescue package. Leave aside the fact that seniors, thanks to good habits and a reluctance to relocate, have been hit less by foreclosures. Aside from all that I confess I'm sick and tired of government sucking up to irresponsible home buyers.

Let my own home buying experience serve as an example. Regrettably, we bought near the top of the market. We needed a larger house for our growing family. The house has fallen in value $100,000, but since we put more than $100,000 down, we're still not "upside down" on the mortgage.

Wouldn't it have made sense, apropos of McCain, for us to have used most of our down payment for European vacations, cars and boats? Then our mortgage today would exceed the home's value. Voila. We'd be instant victims ripe for a "rescue."

You get my drift: These suck-up plans reward the profligate. If home owners can cut deals with the banks to lower the principal on their loans, more power to them. But why should the government bank roll what in many cases was a consumer orgy?

Comments

I confess I'm sick and tired of government sucking up to irresponsible home buyers.

James, I could not agree more with your statement! Your personnal example only underscores the importance or the 20% or more downpayment.

There were many who posted on this blog site the past two years bragging about how they bought a home with only 3% down. However, not many of them are talking about their experience today as they are upside down and now financially trapped.

Hear hear, James!

James, you are a class act, please run for office.

Amen! Although I get the distinct impression that the choir are the only ones sitting in the pews here....

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

About This Blog

(Un)Real Estate offers a peek at the housing market usually reserved for insiders. While it focuses on the Tampa Bay area, it won't neglect dipping into the rest of Florida and beyond. Its goal? Simple: To help you keep a roof over your head without losing your shirt.

Times business reporter James Thorner has covered the Tampa Bay area housing market since 1999 and writes a weekly column on the topic in the St. Petersburg Times. Having recently bought and sold a house here, Thorner has shown his insights are more than theory. He's got the burn marks to prove it.

E-mail James Thorner: jthorner@sptimes.com.

Subscribe to this Blog

Got equity?

Check out the new Neighborhood Watch for home sales trends near you.

Advertisement