BOE: Budget cuts threaten progress
Sometimes, it's who bears the bad news that matters.
Members of the state Board of Education aired concerns about education cuts today, fearful that continued budget woes could undermine the progress Florida students are making in academics.
School boards and superintendents, of course, have been ringing alarms for months. But today's clanging was different: Nobody can accuse the 7-member Board of Education of being a pack of tax-and-spend liberals. Five members were appointed by Gov. Jeb Bush and one, Kathleen Shanahan of Tampa, served as Bush's chief of staff.
"I'm very concerned about the loss of financial support," board member Roberto Martinez, who also has close ties to Bush, said at today's meeting in Tampa. "I think this board has a responsibility … to be more vocal, starting today. This board has an obligation to use our bully pulpit."
Per-pupil spending in Florida – already among the lowest in the nation – has dropped 4.22 percent since budget cuts began in October, according to Department of Education figures. And the near future does not look bright: Economic forecasters don't project revenues to return to 2007-2008 levels until the 2010-2011 fiscal year. And now districts have higher utility bills and gas prices to wrestle with too.
Just last week, Gov. Charlie Crist ordered all state agencies, including the DOE, to cut spending by 4 percent in the coming fiscal year.
"People need to understand that the costs and the cuts are real funds in the classroom," said Shanahan. She suggested DOE lead a campaign to inform people about both the gains Florida students have made – and the cuts she said could erode them.
Districts are laying off employees, freezing teacher pay and turning up thermostats. The cuts have even sliced into programs tied to Bush's accountability regimen, including a reduction in school reward money and elimination of a standardized test used to gauge Florida's progress against the national average.
In some districts, even reading coaches are on the chopping block. "They're having to make tough choices of, "Can we keep as many?' " K-12 Chancellor Frances Haithcock told the board.
Only Akshay Desai of St. Petersburg offered a counterpoint to his fellow members: "I wanted to take a slightly different take on this doom and gloom," said Desai, a Crist appointee. "Like the Chinese say, a crisis or challenge is an opportunity."
Desai said the cuts afforded districts a chance to become more efficient.
- Ron Matus, state education reporter


Get inside the world of Florida education with St. Petersburg Times staff writer Jeffrey S. Solochek and the rest of the Times education reporting team. We'll bring you up-to-date information about the latest education trends, fads and news and dig deep into Tampa Bay area school issues.
It is amazing that the BOE is taking this stand. It would be great if they would START by reviewing all of their current positions against their responsibilities (and limits to their powers) that exist in the constitution. The Florida Schools of Excellence is a travesty. Even though the law allows for exclusive authority for school districts, the FSE has decided that no single district in the state has earned that right. Unfortunately, the constitution says that each school board (in other words all of them) shall supervise, operate and control all public schools within their geographical boundaries. Charter schools are public schools. This would suggest that the Supreme Law gives exclusive authority to all 67 districts while the small laws of the legislature and rules of the BOE and FSE try to usurp that right. At this point the Legislature, BOE and FSE need some intensive reading interventions to try to improve their comprehension of about a dozen very simple words.
Posted by: | June 17, 2008 at 03:29 PM
3:29 -- We'll see how your little constitutional (mis)interpretation falls out. Additionally, the FSE has nothing to do with the State Board of Education's decision to grant a school district's request for exclusive authority. Last year, 3 districts were granted exclusive authority. This year, there are over a dozen districts still in the running.
Posted by: | June 17, 2008 at 09:59 PM
I am sorry 9:59 p.m. Please walk me through the words of the Constitution to explain to me where an appointed board (FSE) has the authority or responsibility to replace an elected board. Show me; don't tell me. There isn't anyway to read the words that say that school boards will supervise, control and operate all public schools within their geographic boundaries except that the school boards and not the FSE will do these duties. Right? Right.
Posted by: | June 18, 2008 at 10:27 AM
Wrong 10:27, wrong. I won't waste my time explaining it to a peon like yourself, but you can read it in the opinion... if the districts don't chicken out and withdraw their constitutional challenge (again)!
Posted by: | June 23, 2008 at 07:32 PM