... early childhood education advocate David Lawrence. The former Miami Herald publisher helped push Florida's universal prekindergarten constitutional amendment to victory in 2002. Now head of the Early Childhood Initiative Foundation, he tours the country talking about the importance of educating children ages 0-5. (For a more detailed bio, click here.) Lawrence discussed the pros and cons of Florida's Voluntary Pre-K program as it ends its second year with reporter Jeff Solochek.
Lawrence: On the plus side, there are 115,000 or so 4-year-olds who are going to be in the program. ... That’s a very big number. If you consider that 220,000 children are born each year in Florida, you now have more than half of the 4-year-olds. And when there are only three universal programs in the country - Oklahoma in a very small state, 3-million people and a very different kind of model, Georgia which is a close model to Florida. But in the first year of Georgia’s program, which was 1996, in a state half the size of Florida, they had 8,800 children in theirs. So when you consider the program is only in its second year, that’s a pretty impressive turnout. Clearly parents have said, Boy there’s something valuable for my child here. That’s the big plus.
Here are the things I think folks need to work on. First, there is no requirement from the get-go for a research-based, evidence-based curriculum. We know we can easily identify at least a dozen research-based curricula, and yet the state of Florida isn’t requiring that. You can essentially use anything you want for a couple of years, and then if the program in theory isn’t working, you’ve got to use something the state wants you to use. I would argue since the state is spending close to $400-million ... people are entitled to know that their money is spent on quality.
The second area is, as you know, the pre-k advisory council chaired by the lieutenant governor (Toni Jennings), of which I was a member, voted unanimously for within five years an associate’s degree for the lead teacher, and within eight years a bachelor’s degree in early education for the lead teacher. The Legislature decided that it would make those “aspirational goals.” Aspirational goals is a recipe for never getting it done.
JS: The governor has said he supports that (having degreed teachers). Do you think that his comments will drive anything?
DL: Like so many Floridians, I am optimistic about the new governor. And so, yes, that fuels, energizes, my sense of optimism. But of course, it still needs to be done and it hasn’t been done. And the next regular session of the Legislature is when? Next March. So that’s another area.
The third area I would say ... in a high-quality program of wisdom, your son would go that program and at the beginning of that program - next month when he goes in - he would be assessed. Not tested. I’m not talking about baby FCATs here. He would be assessed for how ready he is. How is he doing? Where is he vis-a-vis early literacy? How is he doing socially and emotionally? Then ... and again I emphasize, not a test but an assessment. That assessment to be shared not only with the teacher, but with the parent. You and your wife are entitled to know how your child is doing.
That assessment would then form your child’s instruction and learning for the next several months. We would say ... he does real well in this and this, but he needs some help in this and this. And then during the course of the year a teacher would help him. And then at the end of the year we would minimally see, where is he now? What did he get from the program? And in an ideal program, this would be done several times during the year.
That isn’t done now. Some programs do it. But it is no requirement for that. And instead, the state talked about this readiness rate for kindergarten kids.
Recent Comments