Every year Education Week puts out its report on high school graduation rates that differs greatly from the rates that Florida releases. And every year Florida officials decry the Ed Week report saying it's an imprecise measure that does a disservice to Florida's more accurate data system. Jeff Sellers, Florida deputy education commissioner for accountability, spoke with reporter Jeff Solochek about the pros and cons of the different ways to look at graduation rates.
I'm curious about what Education Week does provide. Is there any value you see in their report?
Well, yes, there is value in their report. It provides a methodology that can help us estimate future graduation rates before all of our data have actually been submitted by the districts. Although we prefer our cohort-based grad rate, which actually takes into account individual students and tracks them over time to see how many graduate.
So the state does something completely different. Have you ever talked to Education Week about why they don't do it your way?
I don't know that we have ever talked to them directly about it. Overall this has been an issue from the perspective that when you're trying to calculate, or if you try to have a national measure of any kind, this one being a graduation rate, you have to accommodate the lowest common denominator. So based on states' capabilities, you have to find ways to calculate any type of measure. And so for something like Ed Week's graduation rate, that approach is probably one of the best to accommodate a common measure for all states.
But in Education Week, they actually point to Florida's method as a very strong method. And I know the president and his education team have also talked about Florida's data system as being the best. Is there a disconnect here? ... Why would people want to take the Education Week numbers over your own?
Recent Comments