... Peggy O'Shea, chairwoman of the Pinellas School Board. The Pinellas board voted unanimously earlier this week to close seven elementary schools and reassign thousands of students. O'Shea spoke with reporter Jeff Solochek about the vote, the rationale behind it and the expected outcomes.
How hard is it for you to be making these decisions regarding the boundaries and the school closures?
They're really two separate issues. The school closures is tough. You get parents who are so involved in their school and it's part of the community they live in. You hate to take that away. We looked at all kinds of opportunities to avoid that. But the bottom line came when we looked at the budget and the budget projections and the cuts coming from the state. It just became impossible. We haven't even reached all the budget cuts we have to make yet. Coupled with the fact that we have less students and we're projected to continue to have less students over the next few years, which means we don't need as many schools with less kids. So for efficiency -- with or without the budget implications, there's a certain efficiency as guardians of the taxpayers' money that we need to take into account.
Some of the parents pointed out you were closing down schools that are well regarded and have strong community support, whereas some other schools might not have had that same level of success. How do you pick which schools you must close?
Our student assignment department looked at it in terms of where kids are and where we have other schools nearby to put them in. We looked from a financial perspective the cost of running those buildings. Risk management -- what it costs to insure those buildings. What our maintenance costs are. Those kinds of things. Because the ones we closed are all small schools that had under 400 students. Whereas when you see newer elementary schools in the state of Florida today, they're built to house 750-800 kids. That's what the state requires you build from now on. So even look at some of them and say, Maybe you could build a larger school on them. Some of the sites aren't large enough, because they're older, smaller areas built several years ago. Some of them in the early 1900s, one of them in the 1950s. That was the age range of the schools we were looking at.
So it didn't have as much to do with whether the school was an A school or whether it had a strong PTA?
Recent Comments