Florida has the largest education voucher system in the country. And up to now, no one has been able to quantify whether children who use the vouchers to go to private schools get better schooling than those who stay behind. Northwestern University professor David Figlio finally has put some data to the question, and has concluded -- at least for now -- that those who leave perform no better or worse than those who don't. He spoke with reporter Jeff Solochek about his research, his next steps, and his views on the spin that voucher advocates and opponents have given to his work.
What exactly prompted you to take a look at the way the voucher results are turning out?
Well, I've had a very longstanding interest in both school choice in general as well as the education of disadvantaged kids. This is the largest school voucher program in the United States, so in that regard I think it's a question of considerable national interest. And given that the vouchers are aimed specifically at low-income kids -- or kids from low-income families, that is -- it's targeting a key target population that is of direct interest to me. So to me it was very natural for me to think about what is happening to these schools, who is using the voucher programs, what schools are they choosing to go to, and is the voucher program leading to increased competition with the public schools, and are the kids doing better in the voucher program. Some of these questions I've investigated, and others I'm in the process of investigating now.
Recent Comments