... And these Monday-morning items
Tampabay.com

Comment Policy

    Please be sure your comments are appropriate before submitting them. Inappropriate comments include content that:
  • Is libelous
  • Is abusive, harassing, or threatening
  • Is obscene, vulgar, or profane
  • Is racially, ethnically or religiously offensive
  • Is illegal or encourages criminal acts
  • Is known to be inaccurate or contains a false attribution
  • Infringes copyrights, trademarks, publicity or any other rights of others
  • Impersonates anyone (actual or fictitious)
  • Solicits funds, goods or services, or advertises
  • The St. Petersburg Times does not edit posts but reserves the right to delete comments that violate our policy.

« The readers on geology, Crist and gay marriage, and That Darned St. Pete City Hall | Main | Tuesday morning »

December 17, 2007

... And these Monday-morning items

* Yep, between same-sex marriage and illegal immigrants, it's shaping up for another election year of thoughtful discussion about important issues.

* My colleague Sue Carlton wrote the other day about Hillsborough County's opposition to the petition for an elected county mayor. I agree that the County Commission's pretext is ridiculously thin. One more case of the government using tax dollars to try to thwart the citizens.

* This man seems to be acting with uncommon grace. His congregation, too. So, good luck to him.

* On the other hand, seems like a good time to point out that not every use of the word "pornography" connotes, you know, child molesting and evildoing and the feds seizing one's computer... I know that YOU would never look at dirty stuff on the Internet, of course...

* Does anyone begrudge George Steinbrenner this honor after being such a benefactor to the Tampa Bay area? The question is not rhetorical -- I would be curious to hear from anyone who disagreed.

Comments

Howard, I noted in reading the proposed ballot questions for January that the additional $25,000 does not apply until a value of $50,000 to $75,000, and even that is not exempt from school levies. You mean that if I live in a $24,000 home, the entire value is tax exempt from all levies, but if I am "rich" enough to live in a $49,000 home, I still owe taxes on the $24,000, and I get no tax break? Wow, nothing like balancing the books on the backs of the poorest among us. Our legislative geniuses are too kind.

Dear Lawrence:

Yep. Everybody is totally exempt on the first $25,000 of homestead value. Then the second exemption kicks in and covers the value between $50,000 and $75,000, as you say.

I am not sure of the justification for this, whether it's practical or ideological ("everybody should contribute SOMETHING"). As a practical matter, I wonder how many homestead values fall between $25,000 and $49,999 anyway.

But, yep, it's not a straight-up exemption for the first $50,000, and therefore is not as progressive a tax as it could be.

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

About This Blog

Welcome to TroxBlog, the web-home of columnist Howard Troxler, where he and readers discuss his column topics and current events. The goal here is to focus on the merits of issues, instead of personal attacks or knee-jerk partisanship.

Howard Troxler has been a St. Petersburg Times metro columnist since 1991. His print column normally appears Sundays, Tuesdays and Thursdays on page 1B.

Born March 19, 1959, in Burlington, N.C., Troxler writes a mix of reporting, analysis, satire and commentary on state and local matters. He considers himself politically unpredictable with libertarian leanings ("I'm for gay marriage WITH gun ownership") but readers routinely conclude he is hopelessly biased against whatever it is they happen to be for. He is married with no children and lives in St. Petersburg.

E-mail Howard Troxler: troxblog@tampabay.com

Subscribe to this Blog

Advertisement