Hugh Smith
In Marc Antony’s speech at Caesar’s funeral he stated, “The evil that men do lives after them but the good is oft interred with their bones.” Why was it necessary for the Times to mention Hugh Smith’s sexual indiscretions in the article regarding his death and contributions to the Bay area? It added nothing and made the Times look like the National Inquirer. -- John Larry Franks, Clearwater
Dear Mr. Franks: I respectfully disagree. I knew and admired Hugh Smith as a newsman, but I think the inclusion of the whole truth in his obituary is appropriate. This was not a private indiscretion -- he was arrested twice in nine years, the last time for soliciting a 15-year-old prostitute. The case was high-profile and career-ending for him. The majority of the article talked about Smith's career and role in the community, but I think it would be dishonest and misleading not to have included the bad along with the good.

Welcome to TroxBlog, the web-home of columnist Howard Troxler, where he and readers discuss his column topics and current events. The goal here is to focus on the merits of issues, instead of personal attacks or knee-jerk partisanship.
I totally agree with you Howard. Nothing turns my stomach more than post death hipocracy, all of a sudden they are saints? He was wonderful, but flawed man.
Posted by: Karen | December 20, 2007 at 10:20 AM
I agree with you and Karen, Howard. I know the Smith family personally. Hugh was a consummate professional in his field, but a consummate “flawed” human as well – just like the rest of us.
Posted by: | December 20, 2007 at 12:26 PM
Howard, Karen, and... Blank?
Talk about beating a dead horse...
Mr. Smith had the unfortunate experience of having his dirty laundry aired publicly, while the rest of us have better luck keeping ours hidden.
Maybe we should raise our expecations of the obit writers and require them to do investigations into ordinary citizens backgrounds and remind everyone of what really rotten people they were.
No sense in letting a double standard get by...
Posted by: John Gibson | December 20, 2007 at 04:27 PM
Mr. Gibson, This was not an obituary, but a news article. Obituaries are typically written by the family. When you are a public figure, especially one in the news media, you have to expect that if you are arrested, it will be reported. The sense that I get from this and other things written about Hugh Smith is that he was a good, hard working professional who had some personal flaws. Since we are all human, we all have flaws. Reporting the truth in no way diminshes the love and respect that people apparently had for him. You don't become a saint simply by dying.
Posted by: Ron | December 20, 2007 at 04:42 PM
Ron,
There goes my saint plan A...
I guess I spoke too soon. I should have read it. It is legit in a news article.
Thanks for pointing out my flaws!
Posted by: John Gibson | December 20, 2007 at 07:14 PM
Just like Dave Zachem. Stay out of politics and the public eye if you have a penchant for whores.
Posted by: | December 21, 2007 at 02:32 PM