There's only one good reason to legalize gambling: because you believe people should be able to gamble if they want to.
Make no mistake -- that's a fine, libertarian reason. I'm all for it.
But we can never just say it that way. Nope, We have to come up with excuses and justifications.
Take Gov. Charlie Crist. In another big reversal from Jeb Bush, Crist says that perhaps Florida should allow more gambling to help raise money for the state.
After all, the state is already negotiating with the Seminole Tribe on what kind of new gambling will be allowed. The feds have given the state a deadline for those talks.
Meanwhile, the state is facing a $1.1-billion budget shortfall...
"I want to be open-minded'' the governor says, "and I want us to be innovative." In other words, he thinks maybe the state should negotiate for a piece of the action.
In general, I don't believe that gambling money is as good a deal as it's made out to be.
I don't believe as much of it is "new" money as folks like to claim. A lot of it is money that tourists -- or Floridians -- would have spent on something else.
Secondly, an expanded gambling culture has many offsetting costs, hidden and otherwise. Those costs include associated crime, addiction, and emphasis on the wrong values.
Thirdly, history shows that gambling revenue tends to replace tax revenue, instead of adding to it. The Florida Lottery's claim that it "helps" education is a perfect example. After we got the Lottery, we just reduced the share of the rest of the state's revenues that went to schools.
There's no such thing as "free" money. But we sure like to think so. We would rather do almost anything than pay taxes.
So, sure, let's have Vegas-style gambling. Let's shoot craps and play roulette and blackjack. I'm all for it.
But spare us the justifications that it's for "economic development" or "good for education" or any of that stuff.
Some say that the speaker of the state House, Marco Rubio, is just sucking up to social conservatives by being opposed to expanded gambling. But I have to say, if he is willing to stay opposed even in the fact of a $1.1-billion budget shortfall, at least there's some consistency there.
Recent Comments