Leavitt at media days: What they're writing ...

As a beat writer, it's fun to see how newspapers across the state handle an event like this weekend's state football media days. I'm always curious to see what other papers that don't write about USF very often find most interesting when they get a half-hour interview with Jim Leavitt that covers a little of everything. Thanks to the wonderful resource that is Google News, I can offer a ton of links ...

-- Florida Today has a piece on Leavitt and USF's progress. My favorite line, both optimistic and technically accurate: "A first sellout crowd is possible." And yes, after some suspense, they sneak in the obligatory "abandoned trailers" reference in the endquote.

-- Leavitt got a lot of questions of UCF, does he want to keep playing the series beyond 2008, etc. There really was nothing new this weekend, but there still are stories in the Herald-Tribune.  Endquote? "I am worried about our first game against Elon." Another good story in the Bradenton Herald, trailer-free with only a token mention of Elon.

-- More UCF: the Orlando Sentinel writes that Leavitt expressed "ambivalence" about extending the series beyond 2008. Leavitt's we're-playing-too-many-state-schools diplomacy is a bit silly. He's ambivalent about playing more games with UCF the way I'm ambivalent about whether I'd like to get West Nile. Again, what we wrote two years ago: The only thing USF gets by playing UCF is the annual risk of allowing a close rival to instantly catch or surpass it. If USF doesn't play UCF, it's hard for UCF to say they're on the same level with the Bulls; even if they were to win C-USA, USF can claim it's an inferior non-BCS league. Leavitt doesn't want to say that and fire 'em up, that's all.

My favorite awkward Leavitt end-around, which didn't make the 2,800-word transcript, came when he was asked how the USF-UCF rivalry makes sense if only for its geographic proximity: "You have the distance. FAU's about four hours. Miami's four hours, 45 minutes. Orlando's about an hour and a half, the closest one of those three. Gainesville's two hours. Florida State took me, don't tell anybody, but I did it in under four hours. They're all pretty close. We're all recruiting against the same people. You play a team in Florida, the emotion is high no matter which one you play." Oh. OK.

-- I'm just being mean now, but the Idaho Statesman mentions USF among its "Teams that could suprise." (sic) Hey, it's a tricky word, don't get me wrong. Next time I get something wrong, remind me about karma. Oh, and Covers.com has Mike Ford among "the nation's dozen most pivotal RBs," going so far as to say that the freshman "oozes talent." I think there's an antibiotic for that.

Comments

[Doug Currier II]

GA - Thanks for the heads up on the other papers. I love to read the coverage in local papers before and after USF is playing the local team. Of course, it's more fun after a victory.

[G.A.]

USF and most Big East schools need to schedule I-AA teams for home games to ensure they have at least six home games each season. With the Big East's unbalanced league schedule, each team has only three league home games every other year.

[Eric S.]

You can say "When UCF ascends to the level where beating them would mean something other than doing what's expected of us, then give them a game every year.

As it is, there's no benefit from a strategic standpoint... zip zilch zero... to allowing UCF a chance to knock USF off"

but then we annually schedule D-IAA ilk like Elon every year. How is playing a D-IAA team every year going to help USF?

[Jason]

For every paper that picks USF as a big-time season dark horse, there is another publication that sees them the opposite way.

http://cfn.scout.com/2/661600.html

Think we could get the team to post this up as bulletin-board material?

[Stephen]

A sellout at Raymond James, please. Lets just try to sell 20,000 season tickets..

[Matt]

When UCF ascends to the level where beating them would mean something other than doing what's expected of us, then give them a game every year.

As it is, there's no benefit from a strategic standpoint... zip zilch zero... to allowing UCF a chance to knock USF off.

Sure, it puts butts in the stands, but USF hasn't had a problem getting to where it is with less-than-full houses thus far, so I think we'll survive just fine without the 10K UCF fans visiting us every other year.

[MamaBull]

Look at where this talk about the supposed UCF-USF rivalry is coming from, again, the Orlando-Sentinel. Surprise, surprise!

I am waiting for the media to actually report on what Coach Leavitt says. All the rest is hogwash!

Greg, keep up the good work!

[Amanda]

It's funny to hear UCF students and Orlando sports writers talk about the possible end of the series and how Leavitt is afraid to continue the series because "he's afraid UCF will eventually beat them." This coming from the team that will ring in their new stadium with a whomping from Texas. What they don't realize is that we need to stop playing bottom level Florida teams and start playing with some real football teams to show how good we really are.