Front-page news, and then some

I've been at the Times since 1999, have written literally thousands of stories, but only once in nine years did I have a story relevant enough to go 1A. That's the very front page -- that section annoyingly blocking the Sports section for many of you each morning, I imagine -- and I had a story back in 2002 on the demand for Ted Williams autographed merchandise after he passed away. So I went 1A the year after the Bulls went I-A.

Anyway, I woke up Sunday expecting to do a short, routine story on USF's new ranking, fully expecting it to be around 10th, a huge jump but nothing unexpected after Friday's big win. When the coaches' poll came out and the Bulls were ninth, I was surprised, no like most people, when the AP voters put them sixth, I had to double-check on another site to make sure it was correct. The high level of interest in USF right now is such that within a few hours, the story had been plucked for 1A, both exciting and harrowing, in that I had to find some sources worthy of the front page in a short amount of time.

So here you have Monday's big story on USF's one-giant-step to No. 6, along with a John Romano column on how wild it is just to seriously talk about USF and the national championship picture. If you read my story, you'll see I talked with Jerry Palm of collegebcs.com, and he pointed out the very real possibility that USF could run the table, go 12-0 and be left out of the BCS title game, even if there are only two undefeated teams.

If Saturday's LSU-Florida loser were to go the rest of the way undefeated, then avenge that loss in the SEC title game, there'd be considerable interest in the polls, just as a one-loss Southern Cal team would command high ranking in the balloting. It's not really USF's fault -- what would have been quality wins against top-15 opponents in Louisville and Rutgers just aren't impressive. For maximum legitimacy, the Bulls needed to hand those teams their first losses, not their second or third.

I think it's relevant to bring up now because USF now has to start lobbying with voters, not only winning but winning convincingly, if they want to truly control their destiny. They've earned a reputation as one of the nation's top defenses, so that means voters will be looking to see how many points the Bulls give up, even in a lopsided win. Elon, North Carolina and West Virginia all scored their first touchdowns in the final six minutes; those kinds of scores can now hurt the Bulls in a way they never could before.

(It's hard to throw a non-football headline up right now, and USF's men's soccer team after -- tell me if this sounds familiar -- getting a big win against No. 6 West Virginia this weekend. Bulls won 1-0 in Morgantown, which should put them in the top 10 just like football. Last week, with West Virginia's Rich Rodriguez at 99 wins with the Mountaineers, I'd joked that it was a race to 100 with USF's women's soccer team, which got No. 99 on Sunday against Providence. They get a shot at No. 100 on Friday at home against Georgetown.)

Thoughts? Comments? Expect plenty of news and updates Monday as the national and conference awards come in. Jim Leavitt is due to appear on ESPN's "First Take," which starts at 10 a.m., and USF is working to get him on with a certain nationally syndicated radio host who could distribute "jungle karma" to the Bulls. Curious to see how that conversation goes. ...

Comments

[Ken]

Congrats, Greg. I read it at 6am. Fantastic.

I don't think we have to get too concerned about all the hypotheticals just yet. Mostly, we have to keep supporting the team, and the team keep winning. Just as Auburn's win Saturday did a lot to improve our win over them earlier, the top BE teams that have lost already could post a lot more wins, and make our victories more meaningful in the end. Mostly, we just need to keep winning.

[Tad]

Forget lobbying! In the words of Al Davis, "Just win, baby"! Its too early to start talking BCS championship. USF just needs to focus on winning the Big East title. After that, everything will fail into place.

Go Bulls!

[Ari]

If USF went 12-0 - the BCS would collapse if they weren't in the National Champ game. The talk is premature considering we have only finished 1 lap in a 4 lap race, but there is no way Mike Tranghese(?) will sit by and allow that to go down. From what I have read, he is a pretty big power player in college sports.

It's not like USF scheduled cupcakes. Four years ago when this schedule was put out, there is no way USF would have been 4-0 with North Carolina, West Virgini, and Auburn scheduled for September.

The bulls have a long long way to go though. Lets get past FAU and UCF first.

[L.A.]

Congrats! Glad to see you didn't go AWOL before going 1A.

[DELdaBULL]

G.A.,
What's with your boy Brian having USF ranked below one loss Oklahoma and Florida (who both loss to unranked teams)?

[G.A.]

Hey, Brian had USF ranked exactly where I thought they'd be, so no complaints here. Landman's a smart guy on this colleges stuff.

Ari, not to go all word-problem on you, but if USF just finished the first lap, I'd say it's a three-lap race, unless you consider the bowl to be a lap unto itself. But I certainly understand your point ...

[Mike]

Congrats to GA on the 1A!

Coming back from lunch today, I'm on 94th N and 5th st in st pete. Weird place for a newspaper machine but whatever.

As I drive by I see it says 'USF Joins Ranks Of Elite'. I've been wandering around for the last twenty four hours waiting for someone to slap me out of this dream, but that headline really drove it home that this is for real.

The car goes in reverse, stops, now I am the proud owner of a Monday edition of the Times.