Unfiltered: Mayor Iorio verbatim on USF
Just want to give you guys a transcript of Tampa mayor Pam Iorio's comments after this afternoon's meeting with USF and Tampa Sports Authority officials and other local leaders. Iorio was designated to speak on behalf of everyone in the meeting, so Judy Genshaft, Jim Leavitt, Henry Saavedra, Rob Higgins and others weren't allowed to comment to the media. Here you go:
"(This was a very positive) meeting with all the parties involved. Of course, the University of South Florida, and how proud we are of all their football achievements and how far we've come with that program, and of course everyone involved in bringing the ACC football tournament here, which is something we're very pleased with.
"We've had a very positive discussion, and I think what's come out of it is very good news for the University of South Florida for the longterm. We're going to look at the University of South Florida structuring a longterm lease agreement with the Sports Authority that will in the future protect their rights for that first week in December, so that in the future and as this program continues to be probably one of the most successful football programs in the country, we'll be very fortunate that that week will be preserved for future football nights, Thursday nights, ESPN, nationally televised events. That is what we're going to do moving forward.
"We are accepting of the '08 and '09 schedule with the ACC football tournament and recognize that that is something we will go with because that is the arrangement. Our real emphasis today has been on longterm and how the University of South Florida's football program fits into the priorities of this community. It is a large priority of this community, and I think that was accepted by everybody in this room.
"We do congratulate those who put out a big effort to bring the ACC here, the Sports Commission and of course the CVB and the Sports Authority. Bringing large national events to Tampa is something we always want to do. The biggest one we bring of course is the Super Bowl, but there are a lot of other major events that we bring. We appreciate the efforts that were put out, but we also recognize the tremendous growth of the University of South Florida's football program, and the fact that that program needs to be protected in the future. That's going to be our longterm goal."
(Question: "When you say longterm, how many years are they looking at to be locked in at Raymond James Stadium?")
Iorio: "I think that's going to between the University of South Florida and the Sports Authority, but it's going to be longer than their current lease agreement, which is five years."
(Question: "When you talk about that week in December, do you mean including the Saturday of that week, or just the days leading up to that Saturday?")
Iorio: "The Saturday of that week. We're talking about the first week in December."
(Question: "Does this mean the ACC championship will be here in '08 and '09. Is USF still trying to get that Thursday night game, or have they decided they're not going to have it and they'll move on?")
Iorio: "The '08 and '09 is something that has been agreed upon. What we're looking at is beyond that. Past 2009, the priority is going to be the University's football program."
(Question: "Would preserving that week for USF in any way limit the ability for Tampa to get the ACC game beyond, in '12, '13?")
Iorio: "It likely would, and that is one of those tradeoffs, but I think it's a tradeoff this community is willing to make to acknowledge the importance of the University's program. Pleased that we could host the ACC football tournament for two years, but that would not be a tournament we would go after in the future."
(Question: "Do you think USF should have an on-campus stadium?")
Iorio: "I don't think that's a priority of the University. I can't speak for the University. I'm just a Bull fan, but I'm not the president and the board and so forth. They can speak to that. We're fortunate we have a professional NFL football stadium that a college team can play in. That's good for the team. I bet the coach loves it. (Leavitt, in background: "Oh, sure.") The fans love it. What we want to do is maximize the use of this asset we have in the community, which is our Raymond James Stadium. That's one of the points of all this. We need to maximize that."
(Question: "Was there any scenario that would allow USF to get a longterm lease and be able to go after an ACC championship in the future, or it was an either/or?")
Iorio: "I think given the scheduling of the ACC championship and the Big East conference schedule, that the two are, in the longterm, incompatible."
(Question: "Could USF, if they desire, if they want to give up that week somewhere in the future, to allow Tampa to go after the ACC, if they wanted to do that, could they do that?")
Iorio: "They could, but I think the future success of their program will preclude that. They're going to continue to be so successful that they're always going to be wanted by the national television. They're always going to be a game that from now on is sought after at that very last part of the season. That final game is always from now on going to be a very important game, because the USF program has risen to a new level. It's not only going to stay at that level, it's going to rise to even higher level in the future. We all recognize that, and that changes the kinds of other events we go after."
Thoughts? Comments? Questions?


Times sportswriter Greg Auman, who covers USF, will post news and thoughts on the Bulletin and we invite your participation in the comments area.
I don't understand how the two are incompatible. I love the idea of bringing the ACC championship game to Tampa but you have to give priority to USF.
USF could play a game on a Thursday and the ACC could play on Saturday. Why can't that happen?
Posted by: postmortem | February 15, 2008 at 08:52 PM
Because we don't want to be stuck on Thursday. In the future, it will be our option, and the BE's option--Thursday, Friday, Saturday, or not at all. And the ACC can go back where it came from. We don't need them here at all.
Thanks, Greg. Great reporting.
Posted by: | February 15, 2008 at 09:07 PM
The ACC is being really stupid with this whole things.
CJL had it right then he mentioned that we play on Sat, and the Bucs play on Sunday.
I will bet that the ACC will "suddenly reconsider". If they do not comply, they will be going back to the craphole in Jacksonville. They would much rather play the ACC champ game in Tampa.
Posted by: JL | February 15, 2008 at 09:31 PM
Iorio finally comes through as a USF alumnus (masters degree) and Bulls fan.
Thank you Mayor Iorio for brokering a good deal for USF.
Posted by: The Truth | February 15, 2008 at 09:34 PM
I hope they dont sign a lease that is to long. I hope the community and the university will start talking about an on-campus stadium in 10-15 years or so.
Glad Iorio finally stepped up for her alma mater. Go Bulls!
Posted by: Andrew | February 15, 2008 at 09:42 PM
Will the 2-year exit clause be in the new contract (when it's completed)? That's what I want to know. If it isn't, how long will the lease be and how much would it cost to break it? Greg, you have some homework. ;)
Posted by: | February 15, 2008 at 09:44 PM
9:44, I think for TSA, it would defeat the purpose of extending the lease if the same opt-out clause would be in place. The current contract is five years, with a two-year escape clause, and I think there would have to be a measurable change in the length for TSA to grant any exclusivity.
I know TSA had mentioned a 15-year agreement in negotiations, perhaps with some level of opt-out in case USF should find a sudden source of funding that would make an on-campus stadium more viable. Any length I could offer right now would be purely speculative.
Posted by: G.A. | February 15, 2008 at 11:01 PM
I have never really understood community based stadiums. They are stupid. Raymond James is example A1, A2, A3 and A4 with respect to the stupid argument you hear about the postive "economic impact" that a stadium will bring...
It deosn't even seem like we (as in the community) owns the stadium...
If the community owned the stadium then the stadium should be run by the community's elected officials. Who appoints this morons to the TSA board??
Posted by: Ari Hinkelberger | February 16, 2008 at 12:52 AM
Unless my eyes deceive me, the Right Hon. Mayor Iorio is an alumna (female), and not an alumnus (male).
Posted by: Stephen Blackehart | February 16, 2008 at 03:37 AM
USF should now bew recognized as the 2nd most important tenant, only to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Hopefully, this means they have full access to stadium at their pleasure, no matter the week or month. Maybe the TSA members got something in addition from the ACC that no one else knows about?
Posted by: Bullbard | February 16, 2008 at 07:09 AM
Now if only Pam would worry about the property taxes and how she constantly cries about what the city will do without bilking the homeowners of the City.
Maybe Pam should worry more about every citizen of this City and not just USF.
Posted by: Stephen | February 16, 2008 at 08:16 AM
Stephen, I strongly doubt that USF is Maoyr Iorio's only concern, please
Posted by: Ashley | February 16, 2008 at 09:09 AM
Mayor
Posted by: Ashley | February 16, 2008 at 09:13 AM
I soooo relate to you guys correcting yourselves. When I comment on other blogs, I always have that split-second when you notice a typo, just as you hit the post button. I feel your pain.
Posted by: G.A. | February 16, 2008 at 09:36 AM
Thats cool Greg..... haha jk
Posted by: Paul Wall | February 16, 2008 at 10:01 AM
Who appoints the memebers to the Tampa Sports Authority???
Anyone??
Posted by: Ari Hinkelberger | February 16, 2008 at 10:23 AM
Per the website:
TSA is governed by an 11 person board with members appointed by the governor, mayor, city council and county commission. The board meets monthly
Chairman
Kalyn Brandewie
Vice-Chairman
Vincent Marchetti
Secretary-Treasurer
Jim Norman
Executive Director
Henry Saavedra
Al Barnes
Andrew Scaglione
Bob Buckhorn
Frank DeBose
Gwendolyn Miller
Johnny Dean Page
Tony Muniz
-----------
I know Jim Norman was a member of the Tampa City Council..
What a bunch of political hacks.
Posted by: Ari Hinkelberger | February 16, 2008 at 10:26 AM
If I hear Pam cry one more time about having to fire police and fireman because of the property tax reduction, I am going to puke. I understand the importance that USF has on Tampa, there is no doubt, but this is not a Mayor issue. She is wasting her time, maybe she should worry more about the incredible buyout her employees are getting from their vaction payouts.
Posted by: Stephen | February 16, 2008 at 12:53 PM
Stephen, I would say this is the Mayor's issue. It is her job to make sure the City of Tampa is in the best possible place it can be in. That include's financially. USF contributes over $3 billion a year to the Tampa Bay community, hard to get more important than that.
Additionally, as Ari pointed out, the mayor is one of the people responsible for the TSA. When the TSA makes decisions that are not in the best interest of the community, that is under her supervision and it's her responsibility to do something about it. I'm sure if you make decisions at work that are detrimental to your company, your supervisor would step in and do something about it.
Posted by: J | February 16, 2008 at 01:58 PM